Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Prohibited: Comparison photos of GM/non-GM
On 12 Aug 2003 22:48:18 GMT, Brian Sandle
posted: In sci.med.nutrition Moosh:] wrote: On 3 Aug 2003 03:58:04 GMT, Brian Sandle posted: This part of the contract further makes farmers pay Monsanto's legal fees and other costs of enforcement. If the contract says anything you disagreee with, don't sign it, simple. Sheeesh! Which often means you would have to leave farming corn or canola. Why? There is plenty of other seed about. Or are you saying these don't compete with the Monsanto product? Well, grow something else that you can make a living from or get out of farming and do something else. Not so simple when it has been your livelihood for generations. Now the pollutant GM genes are nearly everywhere in Canada in those crops, trying to avoid paying the GM tech fee is a losing battle. No it's not. Don't buy it, don't grow it and you have no problems. You get charged it anyway if the GM genes get on to your land. Garbage. You haven't read the court transcripts, just read the sensationalist popular press, or greenie propaganda. I suppose you say litigate, but how do you pay for that when your income stream has been cut? Litigate for what? No-one is forcing you to buy Monsanto products or any others, and sign contacts for the conditions of sale. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why some wildflowers prohibited in certain states? | Lawns | |||
Drough Orders- what exactly is prohibited? | United Kingdom | |||
Prohibited orchid substances (was bare-root plants) | Orchids | |||
Comparison photos of GM/non-GM | sci.agriculture | |||
Comparison photos of GM/non-GM (Was: Paying to find non-GE wild corn?) | sci.agriculture |