Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Help info req
chris French wrote:
In message , Janet Baraclough writes The message from "Mike Lyle" contains these words: I'm assuming that the experiments were carried out with the usual controls, in order to avoid what I think of as "the reading-scheme phenomenon" (impressive results achieved with a new teaching method, but turning out to be just because of the extra attention received by both pupils and teachers). snip At the time I was there, there were no "control beds ", using just stone dust as a dressing, and I have never seen reference to such a comparison being attempted. ISTR that in the article by Colin Shaw I mentioned he talked about comparing beds with and without the rock dust As I said, I only skimmed the site (and a couple of links); but I got the impression that a comparison was being made between beds with compost and rock-dust and beds with compost alone. Well, compost alone isn't a good growing medium for most garden plants. And what is _any_ fertile soil but a mixture of compost and rock-dust plus living organisms? On that basis, I'd say "Big deal!" But Michael Adams has pointed to a more informative set of experiments which suggest situations in which the treatment can be valuable. See: http://www.rosneath.com.au/ipc6/ch02/oldfield/ Though even the paper at that link does say "Whilst our nursery and field trials have been conducted under scientific supervision even these results must be treated with caution. Field trials on one location, over a four year period of contrasting seasons, can have only modest empirical value. Nevertheless they do give an indication for further trials on wide ranging sites. If resources and funding can be found we will extend the trials and fit together the mounting evidence." It quotes no recognised scientific journal, and I wish I could read an account of what they actually did. I'm just not ready to take seriously anybody who says, as the paper does, "From the rock dust they developed a range of cylinders, castings and egg-like stones whose properties were able to benefit life forms, and particularly the water bodies over a wide range. Placed in the ground they acted rather like acupuncture treatments for the forest and the farmlands." I have actually received great and apparently permanent benefit from acupuncture in a specific case; but the above looks like pure hooey to me. Particularly as it goes on to wonder if there's a connection with quartz-crystal watches. -- Mike. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
info req: Torro | Bonsai | |||
req. Info Elaeocarpus Ganitrus | Plant Science | |||
Req info: Harvesting chive seeds | Edible Gardening | |||
REQ Container Tomato Info for 2005 | Edible Gardening | |||
REQ info on mossy, shaded lawn | Gardening |