Hey Zoid,

The phrase 'get a life' springs to mind!

--
I smile and go off waving
(Amiably) - for that's my way

Baal

http://www.helden.org.uk
"Dr Zoidberg" wrote in message
...
Cynic wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:13:16 +0100, "Dr Zoidberg"
wrote:

Another planing question....

Does anyone have any idea if I would be permitted to dig a small
wildlife pond, ~ 0 x 5 metres,

A one-dimensional pond?

... would be called "a river" surely?

Nope , that has *some* width and depth as well as length.
A one dimensional pond would be an infinitely thin line of water molecules
--
Alex

Piece by piece the penguins have taken my sanity
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In reply to Alex ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say :

At 15:38:07 on 18/09/2006, Brian Watson delighted uk.legal by
announcing:


"Cynic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:13:16 +0100, "Dr Zoidberg"
wrote:

Another planing question....

Does anyone have any idea if I would be permitted to dig a small
wildlife pond, ~ 0 x 5 metres,

A one-dimensional pond?

... would be called "a river" surely?

No.

It would be called "a picture of a pond"

I've never seen a one-dimensional picture...

Here's one


..

At 09:08:59 on 20/09/2006, Uncle Marvo delighted uk.legal by announcing:

In reply to Alex ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say :

At 15:38:07 on 18/09/2006, Brian Watson delighted uk.legal by
announcing:


"Cynic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:13:16 +0100, "Dr Zoidberg"
wrote:

Another planing question....

Does anyone have any idea if I would be permitted to dig a
small wildlife pond, ~ 0 x 5 metres,

A one-dimensional pond?

... would be called "a river" surely?

No.

It would be called "a picture of a pond"

I've never seen a one-dimensional picture...

Here's one




If it's on one of those two lines, I still have never seen one.

.

If it's that dot, it's two-dimensional.

In reply to Alex ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say :

At 09:08:59 on 20/09/2006, Uncle Marvo delighted uk.legal by
announcing:

In reply to Alex ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say :

At 15:38:07 on 18/09/2006, Brian Watson delighted uk.legal by
announcing:


"Cynic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:13:16 +0100, "Dr Zoidberg"
wrote:

Another planing question....

Does anyone have any idea if I would be permitted to dig a
small wildlife pond, ~ 0 x 5 metres,

A one-dimensional pond?

... would be called "a river" surely?

No.

It would be called "a picture of a pond"

I've never seen a one-dimensional picture...

Here's one




If it's on one of those two lines, I still have never seen one.

.

If it's that dot, it's two-dimensional.

Not with my glasses on it isn't..

It was a trick. It's actually between the twon blank lines. It has fairies
dancing on it, or angels, it's difficult to tell.

At 09:30:02 on 20/09/2006, Uncle Marvo delighted uk.legal by announcing:

In reply to Alex ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say :

At 09:08:59 on 20/09/2006, Uncle Marvo delighted uk.legal by
announcing:

In reply to Alex ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say :

At 15:38:07 on 18/09/2006, Brian Watson delighted uk.legal by
announcing:


"Cynic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:13:16 +0100, "Dr Zoidberg"
wrote:

Another planing question....

Does anyone have any idea if I would be permitted to
dig a small wildlife pond, ~ 0 x 5 metres,

A one-dimensional pond?

... would be called "a river" surely?

No.

It would be called "a picture of a pond"

I've never seen a one-dimensional picture...

Here's one




If it's on one of those two lines, I still have never seen one.

.

If it's that dot, it's two-dimensional.

Not with my glasses on it isn't..

It was a trick. It's actually between the twon blank lines. It has
fairies dancing on it, or angels, it's difficult to tell.

OK then. I've never seen a one-dimensional picture...

;-)

If it's that dot, it's two-dimensional.

Not with my glasses on it isn't..

It was a trick. It's actually between the twon blank lines. It has
fairies dancing on it, or angels, it's difficult to tell.

OK then. I've never seen a one-dimensional picture...


A fairy tried to dance in zero dimensions, but it was pointless.
So, instead she tried in one dimension, but didn't like line dancing.
Next she tried dancing flat out on a two dimensional surface.
Next she tried dancing in a dimension the square root of minus one but found
it too complex.
Finally she tried dancing in three dimensions, but the stage producer told
her to get off stage and stop smoking pot before rehearsals!

--
David
.... Email address on website http://www.avisoft.co.uk
.... Blog at http://dlts-french-adventures.blogspot.com/

"Uncle Marvo" wrote in message
...
In reply to Alex ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say :

At 15:38:07 on 18/09/2006, Brian Watson delighted uk.legal by
announcing:


"Cynic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:13:16 +0100, "Dr Zoidberg"
wrote:

Another planing question....

Does anyone have any idea if I would be permitted to dig a small
wildlife pond, ~ 0 x 5 metres,

A one-dimensional pond?

... would be called "a river" surely?

No.

It would be called "a picture of a pond"

I've never seen a one-dimensional picture...

Here's one


.

Mmm, I see your point.

--
Brian
"Fight like the Devil, die like a gentleman."