Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/matt...591&cc=6248709
I really like the Matt cartoons and although I'm usually playing catch- up with them once a week, they're normally fairly self explanatory. But this one... I don't get it. Ideas? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
"aquachimp" wrote in message ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/matt...591&cc=6248709 I really like the Matt cartoons and although I'm usually playing catch- up with them once a week, they're normally fairly self explanatory. But this one... I don't get it. Ideas? Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from??????? The gardener has just been 'an expense'. ;-))) -- Mike The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rneba.org.uk Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight? www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from??????? The gardener has just been 'an expense'. A 'claimable' one of course ;-) ;-))) -- Mike The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rneba.org.uk Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight? www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On Oct 18, 2:00*pm, "'Mike'" wrote:
Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from??????? The gardener has just been 'an expense'. A 'claimable' one of course ;-) ;-))) -- Mike The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rneba.org.uk Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight? www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk hmm, interesting, but I'm still not there. You see, in your explanation there is no scandal, so the 'scandal' of legitimate garden expenses will not be standing 'against' said PM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On Oct 18, 1:31*pm, aquachimp
wrote: hmm, interesting, but I'm still not there. You see, in your explanation there is no scandal, so the 'scandal' of legitimate garden expenses will not be standing 'against' said PM- Hide quoted text - Try asking the ducks - they'll explain it to you if you offer them a 125% mortgage on their new house. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On Oct 18, 2:52*pm, moghouse wrote:
On Oct 18, 1:31*pm, aquachimp wrote: hmm, interesting, but I'm still not there. You see, in your explanation there is no scandal, so the 'scandal' of legitimate garden expenses will not be standing 'against' said PM- Hide quoted text - Try asking the ducks - they'll explain it to you if you offer them a 125% mortgage on their new house. Hmm, no, thanks, but that's not working for me either. Perhaps I'm looking to deeply here, but I notice that the gardener is clipping the air. I say the air because he is in front of the wheelbarrow and if you look at his posture, he's not trying to lean forward to be able to reach the plant that is behind the wall, which is behind the barrow. But alas, that isn't helping me much either. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
"'Mike'" wrote in message ... "aquachimp" wrote in message ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/matt...591&cc=6248709 I really like the Matt cartoons and although I'm usually playing catch- up with them once a week, they're normally fairly self explanatory. But this one... I don't get it. Ideas? Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from??????? The gardener has just been 'an expense'. ;-))) Is this a just a play on words - 'stand against you' meaning ' be a negative point with the electorate' instead of 'campaign as a candidate'? Or have I also completely missed the point? Well, 'has decided to stand against you' doesn't seem to fit this play on words. So unless it is a reference to e.g. a play such as 'The Chiltern Hundereds' it doesn't seem logical to me. Or is this some topical reference to independant candidates and sleaze that I haven't noticed, not reading the papers much these days? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On 2009-10-18 12:50:09 +0100, aquachimp
said: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/matt...591&cc=6248709 I really like the Matt cartoons and although I'm usually playing catch- up with them once a week, they're normally fairly self explanatory. But this one... I don't get it. Ideas? The expenses scandal - MPs charging huge amounts to expenses for the costs of maintaining their gardens. I suppose the gardener thinks he might as well get both salaries. ;-) -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics. South Devon |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On 2009-10-18 13:31:23 +0100, aquachimp
said: On Oct 18, 2:00*pm, "'Mike'" wrote: Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from??????? The gardener has just been 'an expense'. A 'claimable' one of course ;-) ;-))) -- Mike The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rneba.org.uk Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight? www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk hmm, interesting, but I'm still not there. You see, in your explanation there is no scandal, so the 'scandal' of legitimate garden expenses will not be standing 'against' said PM http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...k-island-farce -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics. South Devon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On Oct 18, 2:46*pm, aquachimp
wrote: Hmm, no, thanks, but that's not working for me either. Perhaps I'm looking to deeply here, ....... (snip) But alas, that isn't helping me much either. My first lesson in scriptwriting was, "If you have to explain it then it ain't funny." Be content. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On Oct 18, 4:25*pm, Sacha wrote:
On 2009-10-18 13:31:23 +0100, aquachimp said: On Oct 18, 2:00*pm, "'Mike'" wrote: Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from??????? The gardener has just been 'an expense'. A 'claimable' one of course ;-) ;-))) -- Mike The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rneba.org.uk Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight? www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk hmm, interesting, but I'm still not there. You see, in your explanation there is no scandal, so the 'scandal' of legitimate garden expenses will not be standing 'against' said PM http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...nses-duck-isla... -- Sachawww.hillhousenursery.com Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics. South Devon Aaaaaaaaaaaah; I didn't know about gardening expenses in general. Still, the sums now allowable (£1000/yr) seem rather modest. I mean, if you have an office or factory, how much of ground maintenance can you put against your taxes? The lot, I would have though and that would surely work out at more than £20 /week. But back to the cartoon; It's the, dare I say, gardener-in-pretence- of-working that is supposedly going to stand against the MP, not the garden, nor its costs. So is the link supposed to be between the non- work of an MP and the non-work of a gardener? Does the cartoonist think professional gardeners make their monies as easily as MPs? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
"Sacha" wrote in message ... On 2009-10-18 12:50:09 +0100, aquachimp said: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/matt...591&cc=6248709 I really like the Matt cartoons and although I'm usually playing catch- up with them once a week, they're normally fairly self explanatory. But this one... I don't get it. Ideas? The expenses scandal - MPs charging huge amounts to expenses for the costs of maintaining their gardens. I suppose the gardener thinks he might as well get both salaries. ;-) Could be - however as stated elsewhere if it requires this amount of analysis to try to explain it then it is not particularly funny. Certainly not self-explanatory. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On 2009-10-18 18:36:58 +0100, aquachimp
said: On Oct 18, 4:25*pm, Sacha wrote: On 2009-10-18 13:31:23 +0100, aquachimp said: On Oct 18, 2:00*pm, "'Mike'" wrote: Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from??????? The gardener has just been 'an expense'. A 'claimable' one of course ;-) ;-))) -- Mike The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rneba.org.uk Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight? www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk hmm, interesting, but I'm still not there. You see, in your explanation there is no scandal, so the 'scandal' of legitimate garden expenses will not be standing 'against' said PM http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...nses-duck-isla... -- Sachawww.hillhousenursery.com Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics. South Devon Aaaaaaaaaaaah; I didn't know about gardening expenses in general. Still, the sums now allowable (£1000/yr) seem rather modest. I mean, if you have an office or factory, how much of ground maintenance can you put against your taxes? The lot, I would have though and that would surely work out at more than £20 /week. But back to the cartoon; It's the, dare I say, gardener-in-pretence- of-working that is supposedly going to stand against the MP, not the garden, nor its costs. So is the link supposed to be between the non- work of an MP and the non-work of a gardener? Does the cartoonist think professional gardeners make their monies as easily as MPs? I think Mac didn't draw that cartoon to amuse you. ;-) -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics. South Devon |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On 2009-10-18 19:11:27 +0100, "David WE Roberts" said:
"Sacha" wrote in message ... On 2009-10-18 12:50:09 +0100, aquachimp said: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/matt...591&cc=6248709 I really like the Matt cartoons and although I'm usually playing catch- up with them once a week, they're normally fairly self explanatory. But this one... I don't get it. Ideas? The expenses scandal - MPs charging huge amounts to expenses for the costs of maintaining their gardens. I suppose the gardener thinks he might as well get both salaries. ;-) Could be - however as stated elsewhere if it requires this amount of analysis to try to explain it then it is not particularly funny. Certainly not self-explanatory. Like all humour, it depends on who 'gets it'. I thought it was fairly obviously a jibe at MPs over-claiming etc. but maybe we should say 'as long as *they* get it'.....it's worked. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.com Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics. South Devon |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Barely On Topic.
On Oct 18, 11:56*pm, Sacha wrote:
On 2009-10-18 18:36:58 +0100, aquachimp said: On Oct 18, 4:25*pm, Sacha wrote: On 2009-10-18 13:31:23 +0100, aquachimp said: On Oct 18, 2:00*pm, "'Mike'" wrote: Where have the gardener's 'wages' been coming from??????? The gardener has just been 'an expense'. A 'claimable' one of course ;-) ;-))) -- Mike The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rneba.org.uk Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight? www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk hmm, interesting, but I'm still not there. You see, in your explanation there is no scandal, so the 'scandal' of legitimate garden expenses will not be standing 'against' said PM http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...nses-duck-isla.... -- Sachawww.hillhousenursery.com Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics. South Devon Aaaaaaaaaaaah; I didn't know about gardening expenses in general. Still, the sums now allowable (£1000/yr) seem rather modest. I mean, if you have an office or factory, how much of ground maintenance can you put against your taxes? The lot, I would have though and that would surely work out at more than £20 /week. But back to the cartoon; It's the, dare I say, *gardener-in-pretence- of-working that is supposedly going to stand against the MP, not the garden, nor its costs. So is the link supposed to be between the non- work of an MP and the non-work of a gardener? Does the cartoonist think professional gardeners make their monies as easily as MPs? I think Mac didn't draw that cartoon to amuse you. *;-) -- Sachawww.hillhousenursery.com Shrubs & perennials. Tender & exotics. South Devon err, pendant coming; Its Matt not Mac (though that might be his real name for all I know) easily the best, most consistent and admirable cartoonist : satirist I've ever seen. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
barely on topic: have they lost their minds?! | Orchids | |||
barely straw | Ponds | |||
barely straw | Ponds | |||
EM Bokashi (Was: A Biological Apocalypse Barely Averted) | Gardening | |||
Korean Spice Bush Barely Blooms | Gardening |