The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... Jim Webster wrote or quoted: As for the idea of tracing causal chains back to their roots, if you do that then you might well wind up imprisoning the murderer's mother :-( : Who was it who said that freedom of speech did not entitle you to shout : "fire" in a crowded theatre Many people - but "freedom of speech" fairly clearly involves just that. you seem to be a member of a very small minority in holding that opinion Fortunately, that particular action is not against the law anywhere - AFAIK. You might get chucked out of the theatre, though ;-) behaviour liable to cause a breach of the peace, causing an affray, manslaughter, plus several different H&SE regulations, the breaking thereof could still land you in jail Jim Webster While these "moral philosophy" topics are no doubt stimulating to some, I'm painfully aware that they are not remotely on topic in the groups where they are occurring. If they don't burn themselves out soon, I expect I'll walk away from them. We got here by considering the environmental impact of importing fruit. Could we go back in that general direction - or else wind things up? -- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... In uk.rec.gardening Michael Saunby wrote: : "Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... : In uk.rec.gardening Michael Saunby wrote: : : But your thinking, that it is only the person who does the final (or : : initial in the case of farming) act is the only one to blame silly. : : I'm not sure that's a sentence. : : Anyway, contrary to what you seem to be saying above, I certainly don't : think there should be any blame attached to growing and selling crops. : Even when using pesticides? Well - /if/ they poison people that's a bit different. they didn't poison anyone, the pesticide did. Anyway it was all the fault of the manufacturer. Jim Webster |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Oz" wrote in message ... Jim Webster writes I suspect circumstances might alter cases. For example if you hire a professional hitman, then I think blame is more equally shared as if he hadn't killed your target he would still have killed someone else. I doubt the number of targets is limited by number of hitmen. If, on the other hand, you conned some total innocent into doing the act, then I would suggest you would carry far more of the blame as you suggest Probably, at least ethically. In a way you would be responsible for the person killed AND the sentence of someone who without your persuasive manner, would never have got involved in such things. So more than the hitman, but by addition. looks like the three of us are in agreement here. Jim Webster -- Oz This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious. Note: soon (maybe already) only posts via despammed.com will be accepted. |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Jim Webster" wrote in message ... "Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... In uk.rec.gardening Michael Saunby wrote: : "Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... : In uk.rec.gardening Michael Saunby wrote: : : But your thinking, that it is only the person who does the final (or : : initial in the case of farming) act is the only one to blame silly. : : I'm not sure that's a sentence. : : Anyway, contrary to what you seem to be saying above, I certainly don't : think there should be any blame attached to growing and selling crops. : Even when using pesticides? Well - /if/ they poison people that's a bit different. they didn't poison anyone, the pesticide did. Anyway it was all the fault of the manufacturer. Hardly, the manufacturer simply made what the researchers had developed - and you can't blame them either because they allowed a government ministry to have the final say, and they only did what the minister told them to do, and he has appointed by the government, who were in turn given power by the voters. It isn't fair to blame the voters either, since so many people didn't vote, their not voting almost certainly affected the outcome of the election. So I blame the lazy shits who didn't vote at recent general elections - if indeed anyone has been poisoned. Michael Saunby |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Michelle Fulton" wrote in message y.com... "Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... Whereas to me the only thing that distinguishes it from a gift is words - and convicting people on the basis of things they have said seems like a dangerous violation of freedom of speech to me. Not that I see freedom of speech as a basic right - but I don't think it should be casually neglected or ignored, either. Those who *do* harm - as opposed to those who talk or move beans around Those who *mean* harm, by their words, are definitely culpable, in most western society. Slander, libel, aiding and abetting.... Where were you raised (seriously)? sounds like it could be Hampstead Jim Webster M |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Michael Saunby" wrote in message
... Hardly, the manufacturer simply made what the researchers had developed - and you can't blame them either because they allowed a government ministry to have the final say, and they only did what the minister told them to do, and he has appointed by the government, who were in turn given power by the voters. It isn't fair to blame the voters either, since so many people didn't vote, their not voting almost certainly affected the outcome of the election. So I blame the lazy shits who didn't vote at recent general elections - if indeed anyone has been poisoned. I think we should blame the idiots who eat something that is poisonous. They are the ones who are taking the *action* that actually causes them to be poisoned ;-) The government, manufacturer, supermarket and everyone else involved are only guilty of telling the public it's safe, right? The person who acts on what someone else said is the one at fault, according to Tim, right???? M |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
... looks like the three of us are in agreement here. I make 4. M |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Michelle Fulton" wrote in message . .. "Michael Saunby" wrote in message ... Hardly, the manufacturer simply made what the researchers had developed - and you can't blame them either because they allowed a government ministry to have the final say, and they only did what the minister told them to do, and he has appointed by the government, who were in turn given power by the voters. It isn't fair to blame the voters either, since so many people didn't vote, their not voting almost certainly affected the outcome of the election. So I blame the lazy shits who didn't vote at recent general elections - if indeed anyone has been poisoned. I think we should blame the idiots who eat something that is poisonous. They are the ones who are taking the *action* that actually causes them to be poisoned ;-) The government, manufacturer, supermarket and everyone else involved are only guilty of telling the public it's safe, right? The person who acts on what someone else said is the one at fault, according to Tim, right???? Madame, your summing up of his logical position was, in a gender unspecific way, masterly Jim Webster M |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Michelle Fulton" wrote in message . .. "Jim Webster" wrote in message ... looks like the three of us are in agreement here. I make 4. welcome to planet earth and the accepted legal nicities god alone knows where tim picked up his knowledge of law and ethics Jim Webster M |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
Tim Tyler writes
Having a healthy diet simply isn't as stressful as you are making out. The way you have been putting it, I wouldn;t agree. For nearly everybody keeping one's weight to 70% of the 'ideal' weight results in permanent hunger. I've seen the horizon programme where people had been doing it for a little while (like a few years). They all showed marked stress, not hard to figure out why. -- Oz This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious. Note: soon (maybe already) only posts via despammed.com will be accepted. |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
In uk.rec.gardening Jim Webster wrote:
: "Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... : Jim Webster wrote or quoted: : : : As for the idea of tracing causal chains back to their roots, if you : do that then you might well wind up imprisoning the murderer's mother :-( : : : Who was it who said that freedom of speech did not entitle you to shout : : "fire" in a crowded theatre : : Many people - but "freedom of speech" fairly clearly involves just that. : you seem to be a member of a very small minority in holding that opinion You have access to a survey on the question? : Fortunately, that particular action is not against the law anywhere - : AFAIK. You might get chucked out of the theatre, though ;-) : behaviour liable to cause a breach of the peace, causing an affray, : manslaughter, plus several different H&SE regulations, the breaking : thereof could still land you in jail Not from shouting in a theatre. Health and safety regulations might be applied to the theatre's *owner* - if their establisnment is so unsafe it can't withstand a perfectly ordinary fire drill. -- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... Health and safety regulations might be applied to the theatre's *owner* - if their establisnment is so unsafe it can't withstand a perfectly ordinary fire drill. It is accepted that in a real situation there will be injuries and possible fatalities, emergency drills do not need to be double blind, additional safety procedures are normal, and it is usual to have several individuals who know it is a drill and ensure that panic does not cause injury. Shouting 'Fire' in a theater may well result in what would be acceptable injaries in a real incident, but not in a drill. |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
"Tim Tyler" wrote in message ... In uk.rec.gardening Jim Webster wrote: Health and safety regulations might be applied to the theatre's *owner* - if their establisnment is so unsafe it can't withstand a perfectly ordinary fire drill. -- don't be more stupid than you have to be on the grounds that no one can be as stupid as you appear to be, you have to be trolling Jim Webster __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
Jim Webster writes
I think we should blame the idiots who eat something that is poisonous. They are the ones who are taking the *action* that actually causes them to be poisoned ;-) The government, manufacturer, supermarket and everyone else involved are only guilty of telling the public it's safe, right? The person who acts on what someone else said is the one at fault, according to Tim, right???? Madame, your summing up of his logical position was, in a gender unspecific way, masterly I agree. Getting to be a force to reckon with, I think. -- Oz This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious. Note: soon (maybe already) only posts via despammed.com will be accepted. |
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer.
Jim Webster writes
god alone knows where tim picked up his knowledge of law and ethics Knowledge? I think he is heading for the killfile. -- Oz This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious. Note: soon (maybe already) only posts via despammed.com will be accepted. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter