Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 16:24:34 +0200, "JennyC" wrote:
"anton" wrote in message ... JennyC wrote in message ... Surely the web is just as reliable or not as other sources ........? "..And she shows you where to look Among the garbage and the flowers " Anton Hi Anton ! She is wearing rags and feathers From Salvation Army counters............ That's me that is :~)) Jenny oh no it's not it's Susanne. :-) -- martin |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
In article , martin
writes I have had something similar recently regarding the aircraft carrier Karel Dorman, there have been two of them since the war. and just to add even more confusion, whilst at the time I made my posting re the 1960's H.M.S.Falmouth and was 'certain' I was on the same one, there was an H.M.S.Falmouth during the Second World War!! BUT, she was broken up in Blyth in 1968 so I 'knew' she wasn't the one!!! The Ministry of Defence and the Royal Navy Pay and Pensions group send people to me who are researching Father's Brother's etc Service time and unless I 'know' for certain which age, era and ships they are talking about, it is very difficult to give accurate information. And now that I am involved with the Royal Air Force via the National Service (Royal Air Force) Association, I am getting all sorts of questions there!! :-)) Very fortunately I have a wealth of contacts in the RAFA and RAF Associations, once again proving that one does not believe 'for certain' the first but of information, but digs deeper!! Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forthcoming reunions. British Pacific Fleet Hayling Island Sept 5th - 8th Castle Class Corvettes Assn. Isle of Wight. Oct 3rd - 6th. R.N. Trafalgar Weekend Leamington Spa. Oct 10th - 13th. Plus many more |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 16:42:00 +0100, Mike
wrote: In article , martin writes I have had something similar recently regarding the aircraft carrier Karel Dorman, there have been two of them since the war. and just to add even more confusion, whilst at the time I made my posting re the 1960's H.M.S.Falmouth and was 'certain' I was on the same one, there was an H.M.S.Falmouth during the Second World War!! BUT, she was broken up in Blyth in 1968 so I 'knew' she wasn't the one!!! The Ministry of Defence and the Royal Navy Pay and Pensions group send people to me who are researching Father's Brother's etc Service time and unless I 'know' for certain which age, era and ships they are talking about, it is very difficult to give accurate information. And now that I am involved with the Royal Air Force via the National Service (Royal Air Force) Association, I am getting all sorts of questions there!! :-)) Very fortunately I have a wealth of contacts in the RAFA and RAF Associations, once again proving that one does not believe 'for certain' the first but of information, but digs deeper!! Jane's Fighting Ships is very useful. -- martin |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
In article , martin
writes Jane's Fighting Ships is very useful. :-) Are we talking Jane's 'all the years through'? :-(( Very expensive and beyond me ;-( Jane's W.W.I? or Jane's WWII? Got a copy, but find that 'The Dictionary of Ships of the Royal Navy of the Second World War' by John Young, (donated to me by a very generous shipmate) far more detailed. Another book I purchased, is 'Shore Establishments of the Royal Navy' by Lt Cdr B. Warlow RN (He was a Sub.Lt when he served with me on H.M.S.Gambia in 1959) which lists shore establishments back to the year dot :-) Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forthcoming reunions. British Pacific Fleet Hayling Island Sept 5th - 8th Castle Class Corvettes Assn. Isle of Wight. Oct 3rd - 6th. R.N. Trafalgar Weekend Leamington Spa. Oct 10th - 13th. Plus many more |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:08:05 +0100, Mike
wrote: In article , martin writes Jane's Fighting Ships is very useful. :-) Are we talking Jane's 'all the years through'? :-(( Very expensive and beyond me ;-( I have two, Jane's Fighting Ships of WWII that was remaindered and JFS 1972 from a jumble sale. another good source for any second hand book is http://dogbert.abebooks.com You can even find gardening books this way back OT -- martin |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
In article , martin
writes You can even find gardening books this way back OT Boom Boom ;-) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forthcoming reunions. British Pacific Fleet Hayling Island Sept 5th - 8th Castle Class Corvettes Assn. Isle of Wight. Oct 3rd - 6th. R.N. Trafalgar Weekend Leamington Spa. Oct 10th - 13th. Plus many more |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:26:24 +0100, Mike
wrote: In article , martin writes You can even find gardening books this way back OT Boom Boom ;-) did you try using it? There are lots of JFS in UK second hand bookshops some even cheap. -- martin |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
In article , JennyC
writes The WWW as a whole is well down on the list of reliability, as is UseNet. (There's very little quality control on either.) Some bits are good, others are nonsense, and one has to be able to tell the difference. But HOW ?? I don't see that there's a difference in principle between evaluating information on the Net and elsewhere, but the Net has a greater proportion of more outright malicious, fraudulent or dishonest material than most other media. Google evaluating quality information InterNet gives a long list of pages on how to evaluate information on the net. (Of course, there is the question as to how to ascertain which of these are reliable. :-) ) But there probably better than an attempt by myself to crystallise the unformalised processes I practice, and anyway university librarians are a more authoritative source on the topic than myself. See also my "Bulletin Board Bestiary" page (semi-humerous) at http://www.meden.demon.co.uk/Articles/bestiary.html for various sources of noise, as opposed to signal, on discussion groups. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote JennyC writes The WWW as a whole is well down on the list of reliability, as is UseNet. (There's very little quality control on either.) Some bits are good, others are nonsense, and one has to be able to tell the difference. But HOW ?? I don't see that there's a difference in principle between evaluating information on the Net and elsewhere, but the Net has a greater proportion of more outright malicious, fraudulent or dishonest material than most other media. Google evaluating quality information InterNet gives a long list of pages on how to evaluate information on the net. (Of course, there is the question as to how to ascertain which of these are reliable. :-) ) But there probably better than an attempt by myself to crystallise the unformalised processes I practice, and anyway university librarians are a more authoritative source on the topic than myself. See also my "Bulletin Board Bestiary" page (semi-humerous) at http://www.meden.demon.co.uk/Articles/bestiary.html for various sources of noise, as opposed to signal, on discussion groups. Stewart Robert Hinsley Thanks for the info Stewart, but after looking at a few "how to evaluate the info" sites, I think I'll go back to relying on my 'shoulder blade intuition' :~)) Jenny PS Nice site you have ( huge !!!) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
The message
from "JennyC" contains these words: "Janet Baraclough" wrote Imho trawling usenet archives for unverifiable soundbites hardly counts as research...or even, professional journalism :~} Janet. So what counts as serious research Janet ? Surely the web is just as reliable or not as other sources ........? I referred to archives of usenet discussion groups, where misguided advice or opinion from an inexperienced ignoramus is recorded together with the careful observations of those who have learned from experience. A "researcher" with no personal knowledge of a particular field,would have the greatest difficulty in sorting the wheat from the chaff, and any conclusions he drew would therefore be suspect. Janet |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
In article MPG.19698ab573da6a169897bf@lateinos, Warwick
writes OB Gardening After the healthy dose of rain on Friday night I'd not watered the hanging baskets or the greenhouse on Saturday.. A brief look around the garden at 2pm had the hosepipe out to some slightly soory looking plants And today it's going to rain :-) -- Kay Easton Edward's earthworm page: http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
In article , Kay Easton
writes In article MPG.19698ab573da6a169897bf@lateinos, Warwick writes OB Gardening After the healthy dose of rain on Friday night I'd not watered the hanging baskets or the greenhouse on Saturday.. A brief look around the garden at 2pm had the hosepipe out to some slightly soory looking plants And today it's going to rain :-) and today it 'is' raining Isle of Wight Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forthcoming reunions. British Pacific Fleet Hayling Island Sept 5th - 8th Castle Class Corvettes Assn. Isle of Wight. Oct 3rd - 6th. R.N. Trafalgar Weekend Leamington Spa. Oct 10th - 13th. Plus many more |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like we're being listened to
Janet Baraclough wrote:
The message from "JennyC" contains these words: "Janet Baraclough" wrote Imho trawling usenet archives for unverifiable soundbites hardly counts as research...or even, professional journalism :~} Janet. So what counts as serious research Janet ? Surely the web is just as reliable or not as other sources ........? I referred to archives of usenet discussion groups, where misguided advice or opinion from an inexperienced ignoramus is recorded together with the careful observations of those who have learned from experience. A "researcher" with no personal knowledge of a particular field,would have the greatest difficulty in sorting the wheat from the chaff, and any conclusions he drew would therefore be suspect. Janet And who ever said journalists were 'professional' LOL;-)) // J |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Are we being conned? Tax hikes? Yep it looks like it... | Australia | |||
Flower ID - Looks like a rooster! | Gardening | |||
saffron looks like chives--did I get sent the wrong bulbs??? | Gardening | |||
will peppers ripen after being picked...like tomatoes? | Edible Gardening | |||
Planted pumpkins and kabocha but one looks like zucchini | Edible Gardening |