Billy wrote :



The newly elected prime minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe, said that he will
seek to build new nuclear reactors, which will be completely different
from those at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.

Yeah, that was a 70's technology plant, under conditions that were
unimaginable then.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

(Dick Adams) wrote :

David Hare-Scott wrote:
Dick Adams wrote:
Keep in mind: Fiscal liberals are liars who teach their children how
to lie.

You know you are dealing with a religious issue when either side cannot
accept that their opposition acts in good faith and must be liars. But
this is how the climate change debate is conducted in the USA. Pile on
as much emotion and as few facts as possible, a tale told by an idiot,
full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Mr. Hare-Scott did not fully quote me. I was responding to someone who
was claiming climate was hocus pocus and it went like this:

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/12/7/the_most_obdurate_bully_in_the
let?s be very clear. Climate change is such a difficult issue for the
world,

Not really, it's bullshit pseudo "science" being used for socialist
redistribution of wealth and power. See? How simple is THAT?!

Close, but no cigar. Socialist politics aka Fiscal Liberalism is all
about redistribution of wealth and power. Climate change is very real.
The problem is that fiscal liberals want you to believe that the
change is caused by human behavior.

Keep in mind: Fiscal liberals are liars who teach their children how to
lie



Progressive Socialists are using alleged MMGW - "Man Made Global Warming"
as a huge redistribution of wealth scheme to collapse the west and give it
all to Socialists all over the world.

This is evidenced by the FACT that China is building a dirty coal plant
every WEEK and no one says squat about THAT.

"Man Made Global Warming" is a hoax intended to facilitate collapsing and
globalizing the United States into global socialism, and it's working!

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...000m1Fx8LsFjt8
and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...tle-12km-area/
and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife

In article , "Farm1"
wrote:

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...a-Living-in-Fu
kushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8
and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...eat-sticking-a
round-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/
and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xabnoPsA9X4
--
Remember Rachel Corrie
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

Welcome to the New America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg

"Farm1" wrote :

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...sumura-Living-
in-Fukushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8 and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...ied-meat-stick
ing-around-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/ and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife




How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such tsunami
conditions.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

Wildbilly wrote :

In article , "Farm1"
wrote:

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...tsumura-Living
-in-Fu kushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8
and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...ried-meat-stic
king-a round-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/
and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xabnoPsA9X4

Ah, the "No Nukes" movement from the 60's. How quaint.

Yet 21st century nuclear technology is completely safe, despite whiny
socialist propagandist enviro-nazis.

We have enough safe clean nuclear to cheaply power the whole world for 2
billion years.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Jane Galt wrote:
How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such
tsunami conditions.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and recovered
for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power, having carefully
avoided defending your errors about climate change you shift the topic. No
surprise. But the content is actually much the same, accusing your
perceived opposition of bad faith and repeating chants you like the sound of
that you don't quite understand. No surprise. Either your courage or your
knowledge is insufficient to carry on a responsive conversation, which is
it?

David

"David Hare-Scott" wrote :

Jane Galt wrote:
How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such
tsunami conditions.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and
recovered for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power, having
carefully avoided defending your errors about climate change you shift
the topic. No surprise. But the content is actually much the same,
accusing your perceived opposition of bad faith and repeating chants you
like the sound of that you don't quite understand. No surprise. Either
your courage or your knowledge is insufficient to carry on a responsive
conversation, which is it?

David

So harsh on someone who doesn't have blind faith in your religions of "Man
Made Global Warming" and "No Nukes".

Jane Galt wrote:

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and
recovered for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power,
having carefully avoided defending your errors about climate change
you shift the topic. No surprise. But the content is actually much
the same, accusing your perceived opposition of bad faith and
repeating chants you like the sound of that you don't quite
understand. No surprise. Either your courage or your knowledge is
insufficient to carry on a responsive conversation, which is it?

David

So harsh on someone who doesn't have blind faith in your religions of
"Man Made Global Warming" and "No Nukes".

On the contrary I care little for faith. I care much for evidence and
reasoning, you should give it a try. Let me start you off, here is your
post:

quote
Has nothing to do with the fact that government FUNDED weather organizations
were lying with their data, we may actually be entering a period of global
cooling, and the climate has been changing for billions of years!

In fact there were periods in Europe when thet couldn't even grow crops and
were all starving, BEFORE modern carbon emissions!
unquote

The next part is where you respond and present your evidence for these
claims that you say show climate change is a fraud. You need to establish
both the truth AND the relevance of these statements to your position:

1 - weather organisations were lying with their data
2 - we may be entering a period of global cooling
3 - climate has been changing for billions of years
4 - there were periods in Europe when they couldn't even grow crops and were
all starving, BEFORE modern carbon emissions

Take them one by one, show us your understanding. Or you could disappear
again.

David

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Wildbilly wrote :

In article , "Farm1"
wrote:

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...tsumura-Living
-in-Fu kushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8
and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...ried-meat-stic
king-a round-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/
and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xabnoPsA9X4

Ah, the "No Nukes" movement from the 60's. How quaint.

Yet 21st century nuclear technology is completely safe, despite whiny
socialist propagandist enviro-nazis.

If it's so safe then when are you offeing to store all those spent fuel rods
in your bedroom?

We have enough safe clean nuclear to cheaply power the whole world for 2
billion years.
http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

That poorly written piece is truly amazing. Google shows that the author
of that manifesto is a Tea Bagger. Now wonder it is so poorly written. But
it did give me a good laugh so thanks for posting the cite.

"David Hare-Scott" wrote in message
...
Jane Galt wrote:
How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such
tsunami conditions.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and
recovered for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power, having
carefully avoided defending your errors about climate change you shift the
topic. No surprise. But the content is actually much the same, accusing
your perceived opposition of bad faith and repeating chants you like the
sound of that you don't quite understand. No surprise. Either your
courage or your knowledge is insufficient to carry on a responsive
conversation, which is it?

The author of the nuclear diatribe is a Tea Bagger. 'Nuff said methinks.

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
"David Hare-Scott" wrote :

Jane Galt wrote:
How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such
tsunami conditions.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

So you are back to hurl more slogans and insults having rested and
recovered for four months. Now you are on about nuclear power, having
carefully avoided defending your errors about climate change you shift
the topic. No surprise. But the content is actually much the same,
accusing your perceived opposition of bad faith and repeating chants you
like the sound of that you don't quite understand. No surprise. Either
your courage or your knowledge is insufficient to carry on a responsive
conversation, which is it?

David

So harsh on someone who doesn't have blind faith in your religions of "Man
Made Global Warming" and "No Nukes".

Harsh? As opposed to your use of 'environazis'?

In article . 131,
Jane Galt wrote:

Wildbilly wrote :

In article , "Farm1"
wrote:

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...tsumura-Living
-in-Fu kushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8
and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...ried-meat-stic
king-a round-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/
and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xabnoPsA9X4

Ah, the "No Nukes" movement from the 60's. How quaint.

Yet 21st century nuclear technology is completely safe, despite whiny
socialist propagandist enviro-nazis.

We have enough safe clean nuclear to cheaply power the whole world for 2
billion years.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Blah, blah, blah. If nuclear energy was safe, the investors in nuclear
energy wouldn't require that government underwrite their insurance. Got
to put your money where your big, fat mouth is, sweety.

--
Remember Rachel Corrie
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

Welcome to the New America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg

In article , "Farm1"
wrote:

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Wildbilly wrote :

In article , "Farm1"
wrote:

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...tsumura-Living
-in-Fu kushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8
and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...ried-meat-stic
king-a round-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/
and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xabnoPsA9X4

Ah, the "No Nukes" movement from the 60's. How quaint.

Yet 21st century nuclear technology is completely safe, despite whiny
socialist propagandist enviro-nazis.

If it's so safe then when are you offeing to store all those spent fuel rods
in your bedroom?

We have enough safe clean nuclear to cheaply power the whole world for 2
billion years.
http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

That poorly written piece is truly amazing. Google shows that the author
of that manifesto is a Tea Bagger. Now wonder it is so poorly written. But
it did give me a good laugh so thanks for posting the cite.

Indeed! Good show Farm1. Nut jobs leading nut jobs. I presume the ghost
of Dixy Lee Ray will be along next.

--
Remember Rachel Corrie
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

Welcome to the New America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg

In article . 131,
Jane Galt wrote:

"Farm1" wrote :

"Jane Galt" wrote in message
. 121.131...
Billy wrote :
When will it be safe for the farmers of Fukushima to resume their
livelihood, and grow non-toxic crops again?


Who was harmed by it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20707753
and
http://nipponnews.photoshelter.com/g...sumura-Living-
in-Fukushima-Nuclear-Zone/G0000m1Fx8LsFjt8 and
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/d...ied-meat-stick
ing-around-the-bone-of-dead-cattle-12km-area/ and
http://www.occupyforanimals.org/fuku...ft-behind.html
and
https://www.facebook.com/20kmlife




How many people were killed by Fukishima, NOT the tsunami?

AND Fukishima was 1970's technology, Chernobyl was 1950's technology.

They now have safe clean nuclear that would even be safe in such tsunami
conditions.

http://www.planetarybillofrights.org...orAllTime.html

Just get the environazis out of the way.

Hey, as stated above we can't stop industry if they want to build
reactors, but don't expect tax-payers to pay their insurance. Let them
leak a few curies of radiation, and we'll have their villas. Put your
money where your mouth is, sweety.

--
Remember Rachel Corrie
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

Welcome to the New America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg