Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The heron file. A perrenial problem (Part one)
I'm not knocking it Jan.
Sorry, but yes you are, and you have reasons. But some of the posts here make those motion sprayers and fake fish sound like they'll work as well as or better than nets - and that just isn't true. I haven't seen one post that claims they work better than a net. But many people have mentioned that nets won't work because of the design of the pond and/or they'd just as soon fill it in if they have to put a net on it. Many of us have found success with alternatives and don't have all the various problems TN seems to have. I don't want people to think they're fish are safe because they installed a MS and a few rubber fish. I wonder if we're taking about the same type of fish, mine are plastic not rubber. Were yours submerged or floating on top? ~ jan ------------ Zone 7a, SE Washington State Ponds: www.jjspond.us |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The heron file. A perrenial problem (Part one) | Ponds (moderated) | |||
Perrenial problem | Ponds | |||
File this under "I Spoke to Soon" (The Heron Cometh) | Ponds | |||
File this under "I Spoke to Soon" (The Heron Cometh) | Ponds | |||
File this under "I Spoke to Soon" (The Heron Cometh) | Ponds |