Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated rec.ponds
Gail Futoran wrote:
My PSA *followed* your post in the thread, but was not in *response* to your post. ... When someone responds to another person, they include what the OP (original poster) wrote or some part of it and author identification, as above. But anyone can post something "new" to an existing thread without specifically responding to anyone else. That's how USENET works. As far as I can see the only people here are those waiting for r.p.m, and those that have ruined r.p over the last couple of years. We probably all know how USENET works. The way I use USENET is that you reply to the OP if your comment is not relevant to the current thread. You replied to my message in the main thread, that's the reason I questioned it's meaning. There have been a fair amount of accusations made during the discussion in the past two weeks where one person asserts another person posted something, and the assertion was not true. Checking the Google archives is one way of sorting out the truth. Hopefully Big-8 will see through all the crap and give us r.p.mod. After that, if it's not pond related, it does not matter. I posted my "PSA" to two relevant threads, once each, and I won't do it again. Basically, because I give up. ::shrug:: Gail rec.ponder since April 2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2nd RFD: rec.ponds.moderated moderated | Ponds | |||
RFD: rec.ponds.moderated moderated (corrected) | Ponds |