Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
Hi all:
I have a 18'x15'x32" deep pond in front of my house on the side of the walkway leading to my front door. The pond/house is up on a hill about 100 feet from the road. Is there any insurance liability I should be conserned with? Just incase someone would fall in it. I would hate to have to put a fence around it. The top of the pond is about 12" above grade. I put a plant shelf all the way around it for just incase someone would fall in they could get out eazly. Thanx Gary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
Hi Gary, I would call your city/county, whoever is in charge where you live and see what they say about their rules and regs. Then I would call your insurance company. In our area, within city limits, I think 18" is as deep as an unfenced body of water can be. k30a |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
I have done much research on this matter after building my 6 acre pond.
Almost all states have adopted the same laws. I bet most smal;l pond owners here dont know the laws. You are protected from trespassers if they are adult and you post no trespassing signs. HOWEVER laws for adults vary from state to state. For instance in some states if you see tresspassers on your property and do not kick them off and they get hurt you are liable. Trespassing adults are not your concern for a little backyard pond. Children are. Most states have adopted the "Doctrine of Attractive Nuisances". Here's an article on what it is: Dangers to Children: Attractive Nuisances If something on your property is both inviting and dangerous, you have a legal responsibility to try to prevent injuries to children who may wander onto the property. Children, closely watched or not, stray onto other people's properties sooner or later. Often, what draws them are everyday objects -- pools, machinery or stacks of building materials -- that present both an irresistible lure and hidden danger to young children. If something on your property is both inviting and dangerous, you have a special legal responsibility to try to prevent injuries to children who may wander onto the property. In many states, this rule is called the "attractive nuisance" doctrine. It can be roughly summarized with three rules: Children are not expected to fully realize the dangers they may encounter. A property owner who should realize that children are likely to come onto the property has a heightened responsibility to prevent harm. An owner who fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent injury is usually liable for a child's injuries. What Is an Attractive Nuisance? An attractive nuisance is a potentially harmful object so inviting or interesting to a child that it would lure the child onto the property to investigate. An unenclosed swimming pool, for instance, or a fountain containing goldfish could be attractive nuisances. Ordinary objects can attract and injure children: an idling lawnmower, paint sprayer, table saw -- even the family auto. Children are also fascinated by construction sites and equipment, gasoline pumps, wells, tunnels, dumpsters, paths and stairways. You may be thinking that almost anything could injure a small child. After all, even a stick in the yard can be picked up and poked into an eye. Yet a stick is not so unusual or enticing as to draw children over at their peril. And not every dangerous condition is an attractive nuisance. Most natural conditions, such as a lake or a naturally steep bank, are not considered attractive nuisances. To be liable for injury, an owner must create or maintain the harmful object. And even a very small child is presumed by the law to understand some dangers -- for example, falling from a height or touching fire. The attractive nuisance doctrine arises when the child doesn't realize the extent of the danger. Who Is Protected Very young children are far from the only ones protected by the law. Judges tend to look at each particular case and each individual child's capacity to understand danger. For example, an Alabama court found that a 16-year-old boy may not have understood the dangers of exploring an abandoned clay pit and the owner could be liable when the boy was injured. (Lyle v. Bouler, 547 So. 2d 506 (Ala. 1989).) Here are some more examples, from actual lawsuits. Example 1: A 12-year-old child climbed onto the roof of a building to play and fell three stories to the ground. Ruled: The owner was liable, for these reasons: Children were known to play in the area. The roof itself had an area that was sloped and slippery, something that a child would not notice. The owner could easily have locked the door to the roof. (Smallwood by Smallwood v. Fornaciari, 560 N.E. 2d 637 (Ill. App. 1986).) Example 2: A 10-year-old fell three stories from a roof after climbing up and playing on it. Ruled: The owner was not legally responsible for the child's injuries, because: This owner had no reason to know that children would play on the roof. No hidden danger on the roof itself caused the fall. (Corson by Lontz v. Kosinski, 801 F. Supp. 75 (N.D. Ill. 1992).) Example 3: During construction of a house, a contractor left sheetrock propped against a wall and unattended. An 11-year-old girl, investigating the building site, was injured when the sheetrock tumbled down on her. Ruled: There were grounds for a lawsuit against the contractor, because: Children were likely to come onto the building site. The sheetrock was left unattended for days. It could have easily been stacked in a safer manner. (Amora v. Lain, 725 S.W.2d 734 (Tex. App. 1986).) Taking Precautions The law doesn't require owners to childproof their properties. But it expects people to be alert to potential dangers to children and to take reasonable steps to prevent harm to those too young to understand the danger. Use Good Judgment The best way to avoid tragic accidents is to use good common sense. If something on your property fascinates neighborhood children, they can be expected to trespass and investigate it if given the chance. Lock it up, fence it or remove it. If an object is an accident waiting to happen -- a ladder propped against a roof or a machine left running -- never leave it unattended. Ask your insurance agent what precautions you should take concerning dangerous but necessary objects -- for instance, swimming pools, wells or machinery. If the company requires a fence, install it, or you could lose your coverage. And don't be surprised if your premiums increase for the pleasure of having a pool, trampoline or other object. If you are a concerned parent, this may be a good time to be a meddlesome neighbor. Assume the neighbor wants to know about dangerous conditions, and offer to help find a solution. If a law is being violated and the neighbor won't cooperate, contact the appropriate authorities. "GARY BEEZ" wrote in message ... Hi all: I have a 18'x15'x32" deep pond in front of my house on the side of the walkway leading to my front door. The pond/house is up on a hill about 100 feet from the road. Is there any insurance liability I should be conserned with? Just incase someone would fall in it. I would hate to have to put a fence around it. The top of the pond is about 12" above grade. I put a plant shelf all the way around it for just incase someone would fall in they could get out eazly. Thanx Gary |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
KenCo sez:
GARY BEEZ wrote: Hi all: I have a 18'x15'x32" deep pond in front of my house on the side of the walkway leading to my front door. The pond/house is up on a hill about 100 feet from the road. Is there any insurance liability I should be conserned with? Just incase someone would fall in it. I would hate to have to put a fence around it. The top of the pond is about 12" above grade. I put a plant shelf all the way around it for just incase someone would fall in they could get out eazly. Thanx Gary check w/ your city but "No Trespassing" signs usually will cover inside the "eminante domain" boundries Are you sure? Seems to me that only protects you from criminal negligence, not from civil liability where the prosecutorial bar is much lower. Certainly it would be hard to convince a jury of parents that a "No Trespassing" sign could be expected to prevent a 4-year-old from running over from the next door neighbor's place to look at the pretty fishies. Of course, in those cases Gary would want to ensure security for a stronger reason: nobody wants a death on their property. It's bad for peace-of-mind. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
"Sam Hopkins" sez:
If you are a concerned parent, this may be a good time to be a meddlesome neighbor. Assume the neighbor wants to know about dangerous conditions, and offer to help find a solution. If a law is being violated and the neighbor won't cooperate, contact the appropriate authorities. I agree with everything you wrote but this last paragraph. If you are a concerned parent because you're afraid your kids may get into trouble on your neighbor's property, give them up for adoption; you're clearly an unfit parent. Better still, train your kids to behave better. Watch over them. If you nag your neighbor to do your damned job, you will wind up much less happy than if you just do it yourself. Now, that said... if you are a concerned NEIGHBOR (i.e. not limited to incompetent parents) with no children or well-behaved children who would never get into such messes, but you've seen other kids in the neighborhood with all the self-control of excited spaniel puppies not far from the Pandora Box, then you might consider saying something like this... "Joe, How ya doing? Hey, ya know those mutant rugrats on the scooters that have been gettin' into everything lately? I saw some of the little vermin playing around your (pond/shed/whiskey still) and thought to myself, 'There's a disaster waiting to happen.' I've tried talking to their parents, but they're those yuppie types with the Volvos, ya know, and can't hear nothing unless it's over a cell phone, so I was thinking... maybe a hasp-and-lock or a fence? If you're up for it, I'll help next weekend; I've been wanting to try my new cordless drill..." Much better than some idiot new-age parent nagging their hapless neighbor. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 15:50:10 -0500, Fringe Ryder wrote:
Of course, in those cases Gary would want to ensure security for a stronger reason: nobody wants a death on their property. It's bad for peace-of-mind. You're right. That would ruin ponding for me. Cybe R. Wizard -- Unofficial "Wizard of Odds," A.H.P. Original PORG "Water Wizard," R.P. "Wize(ned) Wizard," A.P.F-P-Y. Barely Tolerated Wizard, A.J.L & A.A.L |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:03:14 -0500, Fringe Ryder wrote:
"Joe, How ya doing? Hey, ya know those mutant rugrats on the scooters that have been gettin' into everything lately? I saw some of the little vermin playing around your (pond/shed/whiskey still) and thought to myself, 'There's a disaster waiting to happen.' I've tried talking to their parents, but they're those yuppie types with the Volvos, ya know, and can't hear nothing unless it's over a cell phone, so I was thinking... maybe a hasp-and-lock or a fence? If you're up for it, I'll help next weekend; I've been wanting to try my new cordless drill..." Where in hell are the neighbors like you? Looking for a new place to live? There's a house of those mutant rugrats next door that could use a new place, too. We just need to convince 'em. Cybe R. Wizard -- Unofficial "Wizard of Odds," A.H.P. Original PORG "Water Wizard," R.P. "Wize(ned) Wizard," A.P.F-P-Y. Barely Tolerated Wizard, A.J.L & A.A.L |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
Kids were always fooling around my pond when we were away in spite of
the fact that our place is posted and fenced. We finally bought extra insurance. Just in case. It only cost a few dollars extra a year and if worse comes to worst, it is in place. The kids have grown a lot so don't see any sign of them around any more, but then I did tell them that if I found any more evidence, the sherriff would be knocking on their door. On 21 Apr 2003 18:18:18 GMT, (GARY BEEZ) wrote: Hi all: I have a 18'x15'x32" deep pond in front of my house on the side of the walkway leading to my front door. The pond/house is up on a hill about 100 feet from the road. Is there any insurance liability I should be conserned with? Just incase someone would fall in it. I would hate to have to put a fence around it. The top of the pond is about 12" above grade. I put a plant shelf all the way around it for just incase someone would fall in they could get out eazly. Thanx Gary |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pond safety, insurance liability
I try to get the neighbors to put in their own ponds and I offer them free
taddies or fantail goldfish and will sell them plants cheap. So far the kids have been pretty good, all they have to do is ask and I'll take them out to feed the fish. ) ~ jan On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:38:42 GMT, wrote: Kids were always fooling around my pond when we were away in spite of the fact that our place is posted and fenced. We finally bought extra insurance. Just in case. It only cost a few dollars extra a year and if worse comes to worst, it is in place. The kids have grown a lot so don't see any sign of them around any more, but then I did tell them that if I found any more evidence, the sherriff would be knocking on their door. See my ponds and filter design: http://users.owt.com/jjspond/ ~Keep 'em Wet!~ Tri-Cities WA Zone 7a To e-mail see website -----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News ==---------- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Any insurance agents here? A question | Gardening | |||
OT House insurance | United Kingdom | |||
I am looking for Tree Felling Insurance ?? | United Kingdom | |||
Horticultural Show insurance? | United Kingdom | |||
insurance | United Kingdom |