For those who don't seem able to use Google or read right trhrough an
article to find the links.
Ash dieback is a disease of ash trees caused by a fungus called Chalara
fraxinea.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf/$FILE/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf

"David Hill" wrote in message
...
For those who don't seem able to use Google or read right trhrough an
article to find the links.
Ash dieback is a disease of ash trees caused by a fungus called Chalara
fraxinea.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf/$FILE/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf

Why are you always so grumpy? If we all googled everything there wouldn't
be a group.

On 26/10/2012 22:27, Christina Websell wrote:
"David Hill" wrote in message
...
For those who don't seem able to use Google or read right trhrough an
article to find the links.
Ash dieback is a disease of ash trees caused by a fungus called Chalara
fraxinea.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf/$FILE/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf

Why are you always so grumpy? If we all googled everything there wouldn't
be a group.

Possibly because I don't suffer fool;s gladly.
Using the excuse "If I find an answer for myself the group would die" is
pathetic.

"David Hill" wrote in message
...
On 26/10/2012 22:27, Christina Websell wrote:
"David Hill" wrote in message
...
For those who don't seem able to use Google or read right trhrough an
article to find the links.
Ash dieback is a disease of ash trees caused by a fungus called Chalara
fraxinea.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf/$FILE/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf

Why are you always so grumpy? If we all googled everything there
wouldn't
be a group.

Possibly because I don't suffer fool;s gladly.
Using the excuse "If I find an answer for myself the group would die" is
pathetic.

Enjoy it while you can then.
Usenet is dying.

If the purpose of usenet is to tell people things they could easily find out for themselves from google, maybe that's not surprising?

David is among the least grumpy people on urg (and indeed
on this thread)

In article , says...

"David Hill" wrote in message
...
On 26/10/2012 22:27, Christina Websell wrote:
"David Hill" wrote in message
...
For those who don't seem able to use Google or read right trhrough an
article to find the links.
Ash dieback is a disease of ash trees caused by a fungus called Chalara
fraxinea.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf/$FILE/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf

Why are you always so grumpy? If we all googled everything there
wouldn't
be a group.

No need to google it, the accurate FACT above has been posted here by at least three
posters.

Possibly because I don't suffer fool;s gladly.
Using the excuse "If I find an answer for myself the group would die" is
pathetic.

Enjoy it while you can then.
Usenet is dying.

If so, it's because of head-in-sand numpties who prefer endlessly regurgitating their own
errors and paranoid agendas.. as you so frequently demonstrate.



Janet

"Her@Nowhere" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"David Hill" wrote in message
...
On 26/10/2012 22:27, Christina Websell wrote:
"David Hill" wrote in message
...
For those who don't seem able to use Google or read right trhrough an
article to find the links.
Ash dieback is a disease of ash trees caused by a fungus called
Chalara
fraxinea.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf/$FILE/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf

Why are you always so grumpy? If we all googled everything there
wouldn't
be a group.

No need to google it, the accurate FACT above has been posted here by at
least three
posters.

Possibly because I don't suffer fool;s gladly.
Using the excuse "If I find an answer for myself the group would die"
is
pathetic.

Enjoy it while you can then.
Usenet is dying.

If so, it's because of head-in-sand numpties who prefer endlessly
regurgitating their own
errors and paranoid agendas.. as you so frequently demonstrate.

Cheers, Janet B! Your usual helpful post.






Janet

In article , says...

"Her@Nowhere" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"David Hill" wrote in message
...
On 26/10/2012 22:27, Christina Websell wrote:
"David Hill" wrote in message
...
For those who don't seem able to use Google or read right trhrough an
article to find the links.
Ash dieback is a disease of ash trees caused by a fungus called
Chalara
fraxinea.
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf/$FILE/pest-alert-ash-dieback-2012.pdf

Why are you always so grumpy? If we all googled everything there
wouldn't
be a group.

No need to google it, the accurate FACT above has been posted here by at
least three
posters.

Possibly because I don't suffer fool;s gladly.
Using the excuse "If I find an answer for myself the group would die"
is
pathetic.

Enjoy it while you can then.
Usenet is dying.

If so, it's because of head-in-sand numpties who prefer endlessly
regurgitating their own
errors and paranoid agendas.. as you so frequently demonstrate.

Cheers, Janet B! Your usual helpful post.

The obstructive and unhelpful person is YOU.

Ash disease and the import ban has been under discussion in urg in several threads, since
early October.. as you'd know if you had any real interest in it.

On the 6th of October I posted the correct information about the ash disease plus
this forestry link http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/infd-8w9euv .

Considerably more helpful-- to gardeners--- than your sniping.

Janet

In article ,
Her@Nowhere wrote:

Ash disease and the import ban has been under discussion in urg in several threads, since
early October.. as you'd know if you had any real interest in it.

On the 6th of October I posted the correct information about the ash disease plus
this forestry link http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/infd-8w9euv .

Considerably more helpful-- to gardeners--- than your sniping.

I am afraid that I was singularly unconvinced, largely because of
the inconsistencies and omissions in those and similar pages, and
eventually found a page that I did find informative. My main
objection to it is that it has assumed an Asiatic origin, but
provided no reason to favour that over a hybridization or mutation
event. Be warned that it is not easy reading.

ascofrance.com/uploads/forum_file/15327.pdf

For those who cannot face the thought of decoding its arcane jargon,
the executive summary is "We aren't sure how this originated or how
it is going to develop, but we think that we have identified the
organism as a close relative of a widespread and harmless fungus."
So Chalara fraxinea will almost certainly be renamed Hymenoscyphus
pseudoalbidus in the near future, much to the bafflement of all
laymen :-)


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

In message , writes
In article ,
Her@Nowhere wrote:

Ash disease and the import ban has been under discussion in urg in
several threads, since
early October.. as you'd know if you had any real interest in it.

On the 6th of October I posted the correct information about the ash
disease plus
this forestry link http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/infd-8w9euv .

Considerably more helpful-- to gardeners--- than your sniping.

I am afraid that I was singularly unconvinced, largely because of
the inconsistencies and omissions in those and similar pages, and
eventually found a page that I did find informative. My main
objection to it is that it has assumed an Asiatic origin, but
provided no reason to favour that over a hybridization or mutation
event. Be warned that it is not easy reading.

ascofrance.com/uploads/forum_file/15327.pdf

For those who cannot face the thought of decoding its arcane jargon,
the executive summary is "We aren't sure how this originated or how
it is going to develop, but we think that we have identified the
organism as a close relative of a widespread and harmless fungus."
So Chalara fraxinea will almost certainly be renamed Hymenoscyphus
pseudoalbidus in the near future, much to the bafflement of all
laymen :-)


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

There would seem to be some hope

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20823903
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley