Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Veg nutritional values
Now I am not someone who believes everything I hear, but an interesting
excerpt I heard on the Channel 5 programme about fitness facts, was that vegetables grown and sold now (so not the ones we grow ourselves I am assuming) are seriously less valuable nutrition wise than those grown and eaten in the 20's can anyone really confirm this which must be yet another really good reason to grow your own food as much as possible, and why are they less nutritious. They gave two examples cabbage and spinach. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Veg nutritional values
"Janet Tweedy" wrote
Now I am not someone who believes everything I hear, but an interesting excerpt I heard on the Channel 5 programme about fitness facts, was that vegetables grown and sold now (so not the ones we grow ourselves I am assuming) are seriously less valuable nutrition wise than those grown and eaten in the 20's can anyone really confirm this which must be yet another really good reason to grow your own food as much as possible, and why are they less nutritious. They gave two examples cabbage and spinach. It's possible that the high use of nitrogen fertilizer may cause that or the modern varieties used for quick growing. Certainly it's noticeable that some older varieties of veg have more taste ie. Majestic potatoes for chips. -- Regards. Bob Hobden. Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Veg nutritional values
On 02/01/2013 08:59, Bob Hobden wrote:
"Janet Tweedy" wrote Now I am not someone who believes everything I hear, but an interesting excerpt I heard on the Channel 5 programme about fitness facts, was that vegetables grown and sold now (so not the ones we grow ourselves I am assuming) are seriously less valuable nutrition wise than those grown and eaten in the 20's can anyone really confirm this which must be yet another really good reason to grow your own food as much as possible, and why are they less nutritious. They gave two examples cabbage and spinach. It's possible that the high use of nitrogen fertilizer may cause that or the modern varieties used for quick growing. Certainly it's noticeable that some older varieties of veg have more taste ie. Majestic potatoes for chips. It's because they have taken all those great chemicals out of them, insecticides etc. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
ingentaconnect Historical changes in the mineral content of fruits and vegetable...
__________________
getstats - A society in which our lives and choices are enriched by an understanding of statistics. Go to www.getstats.org.uk for more information |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Veg nutritional values
On 02/01/2013 08:14, Chris Hogg wrote:
I wonder how they know, because methods of nutritional analysis in the 1920's must surely have been relatively crude, if they existed at all, compared with modern techniques. And does it necessarily mean that growing your own today is any better than buying in supermarkets, or is it that if there is a difference between now and then, that it's due more to the varieties grown than the growing conditions, in which case growing your own may not produce anything better. Well that's why I wondered. I thought it might be becuaue they push too many nutrients into the plants making them grow too fast too large too quickly whereas vegetables grown slower, or of older, less economically viable non-uniform types retain more goodness? or do they pick them before they can develop properly? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Veg nutritional values
"Martin" wrote
David Hill wrote: Bob Hobden wrote: "Janet Tweedy" wrote Now I am not someone who believes everything I hear, but an interesting excerpt I heard on the Channel 5 programme about fitness facts, was that vegetables grown and sold now (so not the ones we grow ourselves I am assuming) are seriously less valuable nutrition wise than those grown and eaten in the 20's can anyone really confirm this which must be yet another really good reason to grow your own food as much as possible, and why are they less nutritious. They gave two examples cabbage and spinach. It's possible that the high use of nitrogen fertilizer may cause that or the modern varieties used for quick growing. Certainly it's noticeable that some older varieties of veg have more taste ie. Majestic potatoes for chips. It's because they have taken all those great chemicals out of them, insecticides etc. Spinach fails the Pop Eye test. Bintjes for chips. Not if you want the old authentic chip shop taste of chips, then it has to be Majestic. -- Regards. Bob Hobden. Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I've been impressed the last couple of years how home grown tomatoes even of varieties not noted for taste can taste much more intense than supermarket ones. And if taste is affected, I would expect nutrient levels to be affected too.
__________________
getstats - A society in which our lives and choices are enriched by an understanding of statistics. Go to www.getstats.org.uk for more information |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Veg nutritional values
"kay" wrote in message ... 'Janet Tweedy[_2_ Wrote: ;975752']On 02/01/2013 08:14, Chris Hogg wrote:- I wonder how they know, because methods of nutritional analysis in the 1920's must surely have been relatively crude, if they existed at all, compared with modern techniques. And does it necessarily mean that growing your own today is any better than buying in supermarkets, or is it that if there is a difference between now and then, that it's due more to the varieties grown than the growing conditions, in which case growing your own may not produce anything better.- Well that's why I wondered. I thought it might be becuaue they push too many nutrients into the plants making them grow too fast too large too quickly whereas vegetables grown slower, or of older, less economically viable non-uniform types retain more goodness? or do they pick them before they can develop properly? The link I posted above suggested variety, growing conditions and measurement problems as possible links. I think Janet's making good points. Growing them fast will give higher water content (which has been measured in fruit), breeding for uniformity, appearance and disease resistance means you won't necessarily retain nutrient levels, and picking early undoubtedly does have an effect on taste, so quite possibly on nutrient values too. I've been impressed the last couple of years how home grown tomatoes even of varieties not noted for taste can taste much more intense than supermarket ones. And if taste is affected, I would expect nutrient levels to be affected too. -- kay I find this thread interesting because one of the talks I give is on 'Rationing During World War II', I gave one yesterday afternoon to a WI Group and never does the matter of taste come into conversation. I am doing the talk again to another group of Ladies on Tuesday and whilst the subject of the fact that we ate healthy food then, and what the size of the population is now and is currently in the news and we eat too much hence the obesity, I will introduce 'taste' and see what the Ladies say. Very interesting how many IOW Urglers I meet :-) Mike -- .................................... I'm an Angel, honest ! The horns are there just to keep the halo straight. .................................... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Veg nutritional values
"Martin" wrote
"Bob Hobden""Martin" wrote David Hill wrote: Bob Hobden wrote: "Janet Tweedy" wrote Now I am not someone who believes everything I hear, but an interesting excerpt I heard on the Channel 5 programme about fitness facts, was that vegetables grown and sold now (so not the ones we grow ourselves I am assuming) are seriously less valuable nutrition wise than those grown and eaten in the 20's can anyone really confirm this which must be yet another really good reason to grow your own food as much as possible, and why are they less nutritious. They gave two examples cabbage and spinach. It's possible that the high use of nitrogen fertilizer may cause that or the modern varieties used for quick growing. Certainly it's noticeable that some older varieties of veg have more taste ie. Majestic potatoes for chips. It's because they have taken all those great chemicals out of them, insecticides etc. Spinach fails the Pop Eye test. Bintjes for chips. Not if you want the old authentic chip shop taste of chips, then it has to be Majestic. I don't want limp UK chip shop soggy chips. I want and get Dutch/Belgian type chips. They grow and use Bintjes Majestic chips are certainly not limp and soggy (if cooked right) but they were the variety the chip shops used to use in the "old days" and it's them that had that taste us older people remember. -- Regards. Bob Hobden. Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS | Edible Gardening | |||
Nutritional benefits of Banana | Plant Science | |||
Used Lawn Mower Values | Lawns | |||
Nutritional Immunology: Proper Nutrition can Prevent Diseases and Cure | Plant Biology | |||
Well some people have some values! | alt.forestry |