Help in identifying two trees please (or two trease plees).
Here http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ there are four
pictures of two tree I have called "near house" and "far from house".
There are, in each case, a picture of the bark and a picture of the
foliage. The foliage visible in the bark pictures is *not* that of the
tree.

Any help will be most welcome.

--
....if someone seduced my daughter it would be damaging and horrifying
but not fatal. She would recover, marry and have lots of children...
On the other hand, if some elderly, or not so elderly, schoolmaster
seduced one of my sons and taught him to be a homosexual, he would ruin
him for life. That is the fundamental distinction. -- Lord Longford

I can identify both your trees, but I find the quote in your tagline offensive, and I would rather not help you.

"Peter Percival" wrote

Help in identifying two trees please (or two trease plees).
Here http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ there are four
pictures of two tree I have called "near house" and "far from house". There
are, in each case, a picture of the bark and a picture of the foliage. The
foliage visible in the bark pictures is *not* that of the tree.

Any help will be most welcome.


A close-up of the leaves would help as would letting us know roughly where
in the UK/world you are.
--
Regards. Bob Hobden.
Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK

Bob Hobden wrote:
"Peter Percival" wrote

Help in identifying two trees please (or two trease plees).
Here http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ there are four
pictures of two tree I have called "near house" and "far from house".
There are, in each case, a picture of the bark and a picture of the
foliage. The foliage visible in the bark pictures is *not* that of
the tree.

Any help will be most welcome.


A close-up of the leaves would help as would letting us know roughly
where in the UK/world you are.

Ok. Will do. Thank you.


--
....if someone seduced my daughter it would be damaging and horrifying
but not fatal. She would recover, marry and have lots of children...
On the other hand, if some elderly, or not so elderly, schoolmaster
seduced one of my sons and taught him to be a homosexual, he would ruin
him for life. That is the fundamental distinction. -- Lord Longford

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:42:24 +0200, kay wrote:


I can identify both your trees, but I find the quote in your tagline
offensive, and I would rather not help you.

+1



--
Gardening in Lower Normandy

On 2014-04-29 06:58:46 +0000, Chris Hogg said:

On 28 Apr 2014 21:36:15 GMT, Emery Davis
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:42:24 +0200, kay wrote:


I can identify both your trees, but I find the quote in your tagline
offensive, and I would rather not help you.

+1

+2

+3.
--

Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.com
South Devon
www.helpforheroes.org.uk

In article ,
Sacha wrote:
On 2014-04-29 06:58:46 +0000, Chris Hogg said:
On 28 Apr 2014 21:36:15 GMT, Emery Davis
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:42:24 +0200, kay wrote:

I can identify both your trees, but I find the quote in your tagline
offensive, and I would rather not help you.

+1

+2

+3.

The trouble with Lord Longford is that he was indistinguishable
from a satire of himself, so it is impossible to tell whether
that signature was intended as a statement of bigotry or a
mockery of bigotry.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

Nick Maclaren wrote:
In article ,
Sacha wrote:
On 2014-04-29 06:58:46 +0000, Chris Hogg said:
On 28 Apr 2014 21:36:15 GMT, Emery Davis
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:42:24 +0200, kay wrote:

I can identify both your trees, but I find the quote in your tagline
offensive, and I would rather not help you.

+1

+2

+3.

The trouble with Lord Longford is that he was indistinguishable
from a satire of himself, so it is impossible to tell whether
that signature was intended as a statement of bigotry or a
mockery of bigotry.

Well I'm pleased that someone has at least considered the second
possibility!


--
....if someone seduced my daughter it would be damaging and horrifying
but not fatal. She would recover, marry and have lots of children...
On the other hand, if some elderly, or not so elderly, schoolmaster
seduced one of my sons and taught him to be a homosexual, he would ruin
him for life. That is the fundamental distinction. -- Lord Longford

Peter Percival wrote:
Bob Hobden wrote:
"Peter Percival" wrote

Help in identifying two trees please (or two trease plees).
Here http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ there are four
pictures of two tree I have called "near house" and "far from house".
There are, in each case, a picture of the bark and a picture of the
foliage. The foliage visible in the bark pictures is *not* that of
the tree.

Any help will be most welcome.


A close-up of the leaves would help as would letting us know roughly
where in the UK/world you are.

Ok. Will do. Thank you.

It please me to be able to report that at
http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ are two new pictures,
one labelled 'Tree near house closeup of foliage' and one labelled
'Tree far house closeup of foliage'. It seems I can't spell 'close up'.
Very soon the tree near the house will have white flowers, followed by
dark berries.

I am in the South East of England, and so are the trees.

--
....if someone seduced my daughter it would be damaging and horrifying
but not fatal. She would recover, marry and have lots of children...
On the other hand, if some elderly, or not so elderly, schoolmaster
seduced one of my sons and taught him to be a homosexual, he would ruin
him for life. That is the fundamental distinction. -- Lord Longford

On 29/04/2014 14:20, Peter Percival wrote:
Peter Percival wrote:
Bob Hobden wrote:
"Peter Percival" wrote

Help in identifying two trees please (or two trease plees).
Here http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ there are four
pictures of two tree I have called "near house" and "far from house".
There are, in each case, a picture of the bark and a picture of the
foliage. The foliage visible in the bark pictures is *not* that of
the tree.

Any help will be most welcome.


A close-up of the leaves would help as would letting us know roughly
where in the UK/world you are.

Ok. Will do. Thank you.

It please me to be able to report that at
http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ are two new pictures,
one labelled 'Tree near house closeup of foliage' and one labelled
'Tree far house closeup of foliage'. It seems I can't spell 'close up'.
Very soon the tree near the house will have white flowers, followed by
dark berries.

I am in the South East of England, and so are the trees.

I would have thought that as so many find your tag-line offensive you
would have the sense to drop it if you really do want help from people
in this group

On 29/04/2014 19:29, David Hill wrote:
On 29/04/2014 14:20, Peter Percival wrote:
Peter Percival wrote:
Bob Hobden wrote:
"Peter Percival" wrote

Help in identifying two trees please (or two trease plees).
Here http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ there are four
pictures of two tree I have called "near house" and "far from house".
There are, in each case, a picture of the bark and a picture of the
foliage. The foliage visible in the bark pictures is *not* that of
the tree.

Any help will be most welcome.


A close-up of the leaves would help as would letting us know roughly
where in the UK/world you are.

Ok. Will do. Thank you.

It please me to be able to report that at
http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ are two new pictures,
one labelled 'Tree near house closeup of foliage' and one labelled
'Tree far house closeup of foliage'. It seems I can't spell 'close up'.
Very soon the tree near the house will have white flowers, followed by
dark berries.

I am in the South East of England, and so are the trees.

I would have thought that as so many find your tag-line offensive you
would have the sense to drop it if you really do want help from people
in this group

Seems we're all easily offended these days.

On 29/04/2014 09:37, Sacha wrote:
On 2014-04-29 06:58:46 +0000, Chris Hogg said:

On 28 Apr 2014 21:36:15 GMT, Emery Davis
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:42:24 +0200, kay wrote:


I can identify both your trees, but I find the quote in your tagline
offensive, and I would rather not help you.

+1

+2

+3.


Baa! Baa!

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

In article ,
says...

Seems we're all easily offended these days.

I've been reading Kay's posts here for roughly 16 years and it's the
first time I ever recall such comment from her.

Janet

On 30/04/2014 07:34, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:48:01 +0100, Farmer Giles
wrote:

On 29/04/2014 09:37, Sacha wrote:
On 2014-04-29 06:58:46 +0000, Chris Hogg said:

On 28 Apr 2014 21:36:15 GMT, Emery Davis
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:42:24 +0200, kay wrote:


I can identify both your trees, but I find the quote in your tagline
offensive, and I would rather not help you.

+1

+2

+3.


Baa! Baa!

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

Well hello FG! How's the watercress production coming on? Hade a visit
from the Food Standards Agency or infected anyone with liver fluke
yet?

If you knew the situation you would know that there was no possibility
of either, but since you are ignorant on all counts I will just put your
pointless question down to your natural desire to help your fellow flock
members.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

"Peter Percival" wrote ...

Peter Percival wrote:
Bob Hobden wrote:
"Peter Percival" wrote

Help in identifying two trees please (or two trease plees).
Here http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ there are four
pictures of two tree I have called "near house" and "far from house".
There are, in each case, a picture of the bark and a picture of the
foliage. The foliage visible in the bark pictures is *not* that of
the tree.

Any help will be most welcome.


A close-up of the leaves would help as would letting us know roughly
where in the UK/world you are.

Ok. Will do. Thank you.

It please me to be able to report that at
http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/Peter6/library/ are two new pictures, one
labelled 'Tree near house closeup of foliage' and one labelled 'Tree far
house closeup of foliage'. It seems I can't spell 'close up'. Very soon
the tree near the house will have white flowers, followed by dark berries.

I am in the South East of England, and so are the trees.


Whilst not that good on trees, because no-one else has felt able to comment
on your question due to your signature, I think the one farthest from the
house is a common Sycamore and the one nearest the house is an Ash.

--
Regards. Bob Hobden.
Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK