Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Compounding replacing Darwin Evolution; NOVA show on tetrapods ofDevonian
Recently I discussed the fact of compound leaves in Ash trees and that
compounding seems to be the overall general nature of the DNA molecule. It is a compound molecule itself in its double helix. And physics is quantum physics with symmetry for every particle has its antiparticle and every particle with a leftward track has its rightward track event. So given time, in the creation of anything new has symmetry all due to its foundation of Quantum Physics of symmetry in everything. So in biology the creation of a new species is a symmetrical creation which I call compounding. Given time there is a internal force of the DNA molecule to compound new structure onto old species to create new species. Ash trees were created from old species that had noncompound leaves. Tetrapods were created in Devonian due to the force of compounding of fins into multifins which eventually morphed into legs. So legs are compounded fins of fish. Here comes the great and grave question. How do we get the human species from apelike species via Stonethrowing from Compounding? So if we go back some 10 to 12 million years ago and observe the apelike creatures on Earth at that time then how do we get those apelike creatures to begin a behaviour of Stonethrowing which will eventually lead to the Human species by means of Compounding? You see, I am having trouble here of seeing how compounding creates Stonethrowing which is a behaviour. But a behaviour rooted in the bone structure that is able to throw. I guess to answer that question would have to focus on the behaviour previous to stonethrowing which was treeswinging. So the bone and muscle morphology of treeswinging then became stonethrowing. So we must ask the question of whether Treeswinging when compounded can yield a new behaviour of Stonethrowing? Modern Humans no longer are treeswingers but are skillful stonethrowers whereas chimpanzees are treeswingers and rudimentary stonethrowers for they throw only underarm. So can we say that if you Compound the bone or muscle morphology in some manner of a treeswinger, can you then derive stonethrowing? Good question. But getting back to this NOVA show on tetrapods, it is much easier to see that legs from fins is a Compounding process where fish at all times even before the Devonian often were born mutations of compounded fins but the environment was not suitable-- Pennsylvania region as swampland during Devonian time. Also I must note that the process of Compounding is a replacement of the theory of Darwin Evolution but Compounding is a process inside Quantum Physics and Superdeterminism. So the big theory is that Quantum Physics is everything and biology is a subset of Quantum Physics and the operation of biology is Superdeterminism and inside Superdeterminism is the process or force of Compounding. In the 1960s when I was going to High School I read in some book about a "life force". And no-one seems to pay attention to that concept which has been largely discredited by Darwin Evolution. But I believe that the process of Compounding is in fact what was called in the past as the "life force". Compounding in Biology: to make a first stab definition would be that in Quantum Physics there is a tendency towards left and right symmetry and this plays out in biology in that things come in at least 2 to maintain symmetry. In the NOVA show it was found by Dr. Clack and associates that their tetrapod had 8 digits and with time reduced to 7 and eventually 5. But it goes to show that in Compounding the creation process is symmetrical and that the environment later chisels off (or maybe even add more) to meet efficiency for that environment. When eyes were first created in animals they came in 2 due to Compounding symmetry. Same for lungs, same for nostrils, same for ears, same for heart chambers. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
One way that Stonethrowing is a compounding of Treeswinging is that the
opposable thumb is a compound form of the previous non-opposable-thumb. Can someone tell me to what degree or extent that the Chimpanzee thumb is opposable compared to a human thumb? Another is the Rotator Cuff a compounding of the previous Cuff region of 10 million years ago. Another compounding region for Stonethrowing is the lower back region of the pelvis for fulcrum leverage in throwing. Those lower back bones have to be compounded and increased in order for the thrower to throw with force and strength. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
You may find some answers in the writings of Lamarck.
This visionary is now enjoying a comeback because of the gaping holes in the fossil record, and the outrageous probability factors required for Darwinian natural selection. "Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message ... One way that Stonethrowing is a compounding of Treeswinging is that the opposable thumb is a compound form of the previous non-opposable-thumb. Can someone tell me to what degree or extent that the Chimpanzee thumb is opposable compared to a human thumb? Another is the Rotator Cuff a compounding of the previous Cuff region of 10 million years ago. Another compounding region for Stonethrowing is the lower back region of the pelvis for fulcrum leverage in throwing. Those lower back bones have to be compounded and increased in order for the thrower to throw with force and strength. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Cereus-validus." wrote in
news Figured you would be a Lamarckian. So you say if you wish really hard for a big penis, you will grow one? Dream on, stubby!!! You will never fill that gaping hole in your devolution. You should know that the only enlargement method that has been shown to produce measureable, permanant results is the "stretch it with weights" method. Just like a protogiraffe stretching its neck, you can stretch your spine[s]. Sean |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Jason" wrote in
: ...........uh, just like our never-serious Cereus. Guess he is, after all, just a randy little furry frigid midget running in circles 'round the newsgroups with his tiny rigid digit. And a Darwinian to boot! Why has generational time spans have no effect on evolution? That is why does a bacterium with a life span of minutes evolve at the same rate as human with one of 80years? It's impossible. Darwin is wrong and so are you. Eh, bacteria can adapt to a different food source, or very different growing conditions in a few generations. Humans are already adapted for a variety of food sources, as well as conditions, but that appendix is still there, even after more than 10 generations have passed since it became useless. Can a human change body chemistry sufficiently to adapt to higher altitude or different temperatures in the same few minutes that the bacteria can change its response to its environment? No, humans can't do that, it takes weeks for blood cell counts to change. Your claim that generational time spans have no affect (you said effect) is not supported by this simple test. Sean |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Actually the best method for penis enlargement is the Lewinsky method. I
won't go into details how it works but I know a famous statesman named Bill that swears by it. Sissy Lamarckian Peter Jason is an expert in administering the Lewinsky method at the drop of a trousers. That's how he got his name!!! "Sean Houtman" wrote in message 3... "Cereus-validus." wrote in news Figured you would be a Lamarckian. So you say if you wish really hard for a big penis, you will grow one? Dream on, stubby!!! You will never fill that gaping hole in your devolution. You should know that the only enlargement method that has been shown to produce measureable, permanant results is the "stretch it with weights" method. Just like a protogiraffe stretching its neck, you can stretch your spine[s]. Sean |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Huh.....!? I never gave your mother any complaints.
"Cereus-validus." wrote in message om... Actually the best method for penis enlargement is the Lewinsky method. I won't go into details how it works but I know a famous statesman named Bill that swears by it. Sissy Lamarckian Peter Jason is an expert in administering the Lewinsky method at the drop of a trousers. That's how he got his name!!! "Sean Houtman" wrote in message 3... "Cereus-validus." wrote in news Figured you would be a Lamarckian. So you say if you wish really hard for a big penis, you will grow one? Dream on, stubby!!! You will never fill that gaping hole in your devolution. You should know that the only enlargement method that has been shown to produce measureable, permanant results is the "stretch it with weights" method. Just like a protogiraffe stretching its neck, you can stretch your spine[s]. Sean |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Sean Houtman" wrote in message 3... "Peter Jason" wrote in : ...........uh, just like our never-serious Cereus. Guess he is, after all, just a randy little furry frigid midget running in circles 'round the newsgroups with his tiny rigid digit. And a Darwinian to boot! Why has generational time spans have no effect on evolution? That is why does a bacterium with a life span of minutes evolve at the same rate as human with one of 80years? It's impossible. Darwin is wrong and so are you. Eh, bacteria can adapt to a different food source, or very different growing conditions in a few generations. Humans are already adapted for a variety of food sources, as well as conditions, but that appendix is still there, even after more than 10 generations have passed since it became useless. Can a human change body chemistry sufficiently to adapt to higher altitude or different temperatures in the same few minutes that the bacteria can change its response to its environment? No, humans can't do that, it takes weeks for blood cell counts to change. Your claim that generational time spans have no affect (you said effect) is not supported by this simple test. Sean Wot??!! Even as I speak Peruvian Indians are swanning about on Lake Titicaca which is many kilometres above sea level where the atmosphere is rather thin. These worthies have adapted rapidly to the thin atmosphere in a generation or so. Indeed a lady friend of mine disgraced herself recently by fainting profusely at Match Picher which is numerous kilometres above sea level, but many of her friends didn't so it can be put down to 'natural variation', that is the normal elastic capacity in a healthy body which in this case must involve the haemoglobin. (Effect was right, Affect is wrong.) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:08:38 GMT, Sean Houtman wrote:
...Humans are already adapted for a variety of food sources, as well as conditions, but that appendix is still there, even after more than 10 generations have passed since it became useless. Actually, it's not useless - it functions as part of the immune system. cheers, Marj -- tech work-related info: http://www.mindspring.com/~mtiefert/work/ science editing services: http://science.tiefert.com/ Marj's Mini Mall & Eclectic Schoolhouse: http://stores.tiefert.com/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"M. Tiefert" wrote in message newspsgle6uxaadtv40@matservices... On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:08:38 GMT, Sean Houtman wrote: ...Humans are already adapted for a variety of food sources, as well as conditions, but that appendix is still there, even after more than 10 generations have passed since it became useless. Actually, it's not useless - it functions as part of the immune system. cheers, Marj -- tech work-related info: http://www.mindspring.com/~mtiefert/work/ science editing services: http://science.tiefert.com/ Marj's Mini Mall & Eclectic Schoolhouse: http://stores.tiefert.com/ Quite so. If Cereus the un-serious wanted to name a useless part of the male anatomy then the breasts would have to be it. Remember though body-piercing doesn't count! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Cereus-validus." wrote in
om: Actually the best method for penis enlargement is the Lewinsky method. I won't go into details how it works but I know a famous statesman named Bill that swears by it. Sissy Lamarckian Peter Jason is an expert in administering the Lewinsky method at the drop of a trousers. That's how he got his name!!! I have not heard that that method produces any sort of permanance, the effect fading away rather quickly. I guess you wouldn't know though. Sean |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Sean Houtman" wrote in message 3... "Cereus-validus." wrote in om: Actually the best method for penis enlargement is the Lewinsky method. I won't go into details how it works but I know a famous statesman named Bill that swears by it. Sissy Lamarckian Peter Jason is an expert in administering the Lewinsky method at the drop of a trousers. That's how he got his name!!! I have not heard that that method produces any sort of permanance, the effect fading away rather quickly. I guess you wouldn't know though. Sean Perhaps Cereus uses the old discredited method of nightly hard-grip well-greased pump-priming which clearly does not work in his case. For shame! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
How sad it is to hear you can't get it up, Sean.
For me, after four hours of the humpty dance, do admit I need to take a break. I suppose you prefer to do the Richard Simmons mambo!!! "Sean Houtman" wrote in message 3... "Cereus-validus." wrote in om: Actually the best method for penis enlargement is the Lewinsky method. I won't go into details how it works but I know a famous statesman named Bill that swears by it. Sissy Lamarckian Peter Jason is an expert in administering the Lewinsky method at the drop of a trousers. That's how he got his name!!! I have not heard that that method produces any sort of permanance, the effect fading away rather quickly. I guess you wouldn't know though. Sean |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
It certainly didn't take long for the other half of the Ambiguously Gay Duo
to jump on the Oral Roberts. Why don't you and Sean go and violate each other? "Peter Jason" wrote in message ... "Sean Houtman" wrote in message 3... "Cereus-validus." wrote in om: Actually the best method for penis enlargement is the Lewinsky method. I won't go into details how it works but I know a famous statesman named Bill that swears by it. Sissy Lamarckian Peter Jason is an expert in administering the Lewinsky method at the drop of a trousers. That's how he got his name!!! I have not heard that that method produces any sort of permanance, the effect fading away rather quickly. I guess you wouldn't know though. Sean Perhaps Cereus uses the old discredited method of nightly hard-grip well-greased pump-priming which clearly does not work in his case. For shame! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
O Cereus! Stop it or you'll go blind!
"Cereus-validus." wrote in message m... It certainly didn't take long for the other half of the Ambiguously Gay Duo to jump on the Oral Roberts. Why don't you and Sean go and violate each other? "Peter Jason" wrote in message ... "Sean Houtman" wrote in message 3... "Cereus-validus." wrote in om: Actually the best method for penis enlargement is the Lewinsky method. I won't go into details how it works but I know a famous statesman named Bill that swears by it. Sissy Lamarckian Peter Jason is an expert in administering the Lewinsky method at the drop of a trousers. That's how he got his name!!! I have not heard that that method produces any sort of permanance, the effect fading away rather quickly. I guess you wouldn't know though. Sean Perhaps Cereus uses the old discredited method of nightly hard-grip well-greased pump-priming which clearly does not work in his case. For shame! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Purple darwin hybrid tulip bulbs | Gardening | |||
Compounding replacing Darwin Evolution; NOVA show on tetrapods of Devonian | Plant Science | |||
flaw in Darwin Evolution grafted rootstock | Plant Science | |||
NOVA: "Orchid Hunter" December 9, 2003 | Orchids | |||
nova scotia wild edibles | Edible Gardening |