Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Iceberg vs. Fabulous- comments please?
Jim last year I planted fabulous next to iceberg. It was such an embarassing performer next to iceberg that I had to shovel prune it. my experience, very disease prone, limited bloom production and slow growth. Others have had a better experience. If you had to get another great white rose get Guinevere. Also from JP. Only rose that keeps up with iceberg. Is fully double and has a nice scent too. bullet proof foliage. -- Theo in Zone 5 Kansas City "JimS." wrote in message news:Aae2a.76346$be.56636@rwcrnsc53... I want to add one white rose to replace my John F. Kennedy which was a disappointment. (I just discretely transplanted JFK to a parking strip next to a telephone pole up the street, thereby not feeling guilty that I killed it...) ANYWAY- I see Iceberg makes lots of people's "Top 30" lists, and I've also seen easy local availability of Fabulous! On www.helpmefind.com I noticed that Fabulous! is descended from Iceberg. Any comments on one vs. the other? (and not, "hey, just get both..."...can't do it!) Thanks JimS. Seattle |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Iceberg and Fabulous are floppy | Roses | |||
wish list was Burgundy Iceberg | Roses | |||
Burgundy Iceberg | Roses | |||
climbing iceberg | Roses | |||
Red & White Climbers climbing iceberg | Roses |