Michelle Fulton wrote:
"Jonathan Ball" wrote in message
...

You're an idiot. Your "part of the world" is a little
backwater full of lowbrow idiots.


Hey :-o That is unnecessary!

You're right: it is unnecessary that the part of the
world he occupies be a backwater full of lowbrow
idiots. They are lowbrow idiots by choice. Ample
opportunity was afforded to them over the course of
their lives to become educated and learn to think.
They CHOSE not to avail themselves of the
opportunities. Now, they can't help but view the world
through the lenses of narrow-minded, self inflicted
ignorance.

Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message


You're an idiot. Your "part of the world" is a little
backwater full of lowbrow idiots.


Jonathan does have an interpersonal relations problem

Wrong. I have an intense dislike for tunnel-visioned
parochial rubes like Gordon, and their apologists like you.

Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...

Jim Webster wrote:


Reread ~~shitweed's~~ claim:


I did, some days ago.

but never mind, the nice lady will come with your medication soon and
the nasty dreams will stop.

I was right:

Proving that you graze hourly in the pasture of
stupidity, you are guaranteed to come back with some
sophomoric retort to try to show that you didn't
misunderstand. You DID misunderstand; little
nuggets of stupidity-grass will be falling from your
lips even as you compose your dimwitted retort.

You are unable to resist the siren song of stupidity,
aren't you, Jimmy?

Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...

Jim Webster wrote:

Gordon Couger wrote in message
news:gurP9.543590$QZ.78451@sccrnsc02...


Someone was thoughtful enough to find a supplier of
mineralised supplementary feed licks for cattle
http://www.ccfarmers.co.uk/feed.asp , but that's still
a lick.

A lick and a block are the same thing, you ignoramus.


Not in my part of the world. A lick is a natual salt deposit.


that is one problem with using websites without basic knowledge.

No, it's the problem with Gordon using the internet,
PERIOD. He has ONLY the most narrow, parochial, basic
knowledge; he is ill equipped to talk about the larger
world.


unlike you who can insult absolutely everyone, but with a very limited
range of adjectives.

I suppose it is economical but it does mean that people tend to switch
off after the first rant.
Have you ever thought of increasing your vocabulary?

My vocabulary is at least twice yours. You don't
understand most of it.

Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...

Lotus wrote:

"Jim Webster" wrote in message

...


The audience will make up their own minds, based on the evidence.

That's all I could ever ask.

You shouldn't. The audience concluded years ago that
your a liar and an idiot, and an irrational believer in
make-believe bullshit like "inner earth beings".

Present your INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE evidence that
they exist, ~~shitweed~~.



they make such a lovely couple.

You make such a cute and perfect poster boy for stupid
knucklehead.

Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...
Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...

Jim Webster wrote:


Reread ~~shitweed's~~ claim:


I did, some days ago.

but never mind, the nice lady will come with your medication soon
and
the nasty dreams will stop.

I was right:

well I could hardly let you down and have you sobbing onto your keyboard
could I?
Don't worry, it will get better if you don't pick it.


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'

Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...
Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...

Jim Webster wrote:

Gordon Couger wrote in message
news:gurP9.543590$QZ.78451@sccrnsc02...


Someone was thoughtful enough to find a supplier of
mineralised supplementary feed licks for cattle
http://www.ccfarmers.co.uk/feed.asp , but that's still
a lick.

A lick and a block are the same thing, you ignoramus.


Not in my part of the world. A lick is a natual salt deposit.


that is one problem with using websites without basic knowledge.

No, it's the problem with Gordon using the internet,
PERIOD. He has ONLY the most narrow, parochial, basic
knowledge; he is ill equipped to talk about the larger
world.


unlike you who can insult absolutely everyone, but with a very
limited
range of adjectives.

I suppose it is economical but it does mean that people tend to
switch
off after the first rant.
Have you ever thought of increasing your vocabulary?

My vocabulary is at least twice yours, You don't
understand most of it.

Well if you ever said anything constructive it would come as a shock I
grant you that. As it is you merely make an exhibition of yourself
raving at people. You having a large vocabulary is about as much use as
a fish owning a bicycle.


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'

Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...
Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message


You're an idiot. Your "part of the world" is a little
backwater full of lowbrow idiots.


Jonathan does have an interpersonal relations problem

Wrong. I have an intense dislike for tunnel-visioned
parochial rubes like Gordon, and their apologists like you.

you mean there is someone on usenet you haven't insulted! never mind,
you will doubtless put it right in time.


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'

"Jonathan Ball" wrote in message
...

You're right: it is unnecessary that the part of the
world he occupies be a backwater full of lowbrow
idiots.

I occupy the same 'part of the world', Jonathan. While you are chastising
Gordon for his 'narrow' view on the world, you stereotype and call
names????? Not exactly highbrow behavior... Chill out and let others speak
their minds without being berated by you.

M

Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...

Jim Webster wrote:

Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...


Jim Webster wrote:


Reread ~~shitweed's~~ claim:


I did, some days ago.

but never mind, the nice lady will come with your medication soon

and

the nasty dreams will stop.

I was right:


well I could hardly let you down and have you sobbing onto your keyboard
could I?
Don't worry, it will get better if you don't pick it.

It would have been a welcome relief if, just this once,
you had attempted to rise above your usual
self-inflicted stupidity. But it was too much for you.

Jim Webster wrote:
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...

Jim Webster wrote:

Jonathan Ball wrote in message
...


Jim Webster wrote:


Gordon Couger wrote in message
news:gurP9.543590$QZ.78451@sccrnsc02...



Someone was thoughtful enough to find a supplier of
mineralised supplementary feed licks for cattle
http://www.ccfarmers.co.uk/feed.asp , but that's still
a lick.

A lick and a block are the same thing, you ignoramus.


Not in my part of the world. A lick is a natual salt deposit.


that is one problem with using websites without basic knowledge.

No, it's the problem with Gordon using the internet,
PERIOD. He has ONLY the most narrow, parochial, basic
knowledge; he is ill equipped to talk about the larger
world.


unlike you who can insult absolutely everyone, but with a very

limited

range of adjectives.

I suppose it is economical but it does mean that people tend to

switch

off after the first rant.
Have you ever thought of increasing your vocabulary?

My vocabulary is at least twice yours, You don't
understand most of it.


Well if you ever said anything constructive it would come as a shock I
grant you that. As it is you merely make an exhibition of yourself
raving at people. You having a large vocabulary is about as much use as
a fish owning a bicycle.

That was trite and unoriginal. But typical for you.

Michelle Fulton wrote:
"Jonathan Ball" wrote in message
...

You're right: it is unnecessary that the part of the
world he occupies be a backwater full of lowbrow
idiots.


I occupy the same 'part of the world', Jonathan.

What part of the world is that? He didn't say. I'm
quite certain it's a place where very few people, if
any, subscribe to good newspapers.

While you are chastising
Gordon for his 'narrow' view on the world, you stereotype and call
names????? Not exactly highbrow behavior... Chill out and let others speak
their minds without being berated by you.

I like to berate stupid people for their stupidity.
They deserve it.

You ought not defend a stupid, tunnel-visioned rube
like Gordon.

"Jonathan Ball" wrote in message
...

What part of the world is that?

I'm in Texas and Gordon is in Oklahoma. What part of the world do you
occupy?

I like to berate stupid people for their stupidity.
They deserve it.
You ought not defend a stupid, tunnel-visioned rube
like Gordon.

Gordon is anything but stupid or tunnel-visioned. If you read his posts
regularly, you should realize that. By the way, are you a farmer, or are
you involved in agriculture in any way professionally, and if so, for how
long?

M

Michelle Fulton wrote:
"Jonathan Ball" wrote in message
...

What part of the world is that?


I'm in Texas and Gordon is in Oklahoma. What part of the world do you
occupy?

California. Actually, I only *live* in California; I
occupy my house.



I like to berate stupid people for their stupidity.
They deserve it.
You ought not defend a stupid, tunnel-visioned rube
like Gordon.


Gordon is anything but stupid or tunnel-visioned.

Not based on his participation in this thread.

If you read his posts
regularly, you should realize that. By the way, are you a farmer, or are
you involved in agriculture in any way professionally, and if so, for how
long?

No. But professional, or any, involvement in
agriculture isn't a prerequisite for spotting
tunnel-visioned thinking in people like Gordon.

Note well, Michelle: Gordon FAILED to note that
~~shitweed~~ (the semi-literate "lotus") was making a
claim ABOUT the UK, or more precisely about her limited
power of observation in the UK; and he also FAILED to
note that the page to which I supplied a link was a UK
page, in which they CLEARLY are using "lick" and
"block" synonymously.

It was STUPID and irrelevant for Gordon then to make
mention about what he considers to be the correct
terminology in his "part of the world". Note, as well,
that several people have disputed him. His implication
that salt "licks" ONLY are naturally occurring
formations is simply wrong, as I found dozens of
references in a Google search to industrially
manufactured salt licks for livestock.

Michelle Fulton wrote in message
y.com...

"Jonathan Ball" wrote in message
...

You're right: it is unnecessary that the part of the
world he occupies be a backwater full of lowbrow
idiots.

I occupy the same 'part of the world', Jonathan. While you are
chastising
Gordon for his 'narrow' view on the world, you stereotype and call
names????? Not exactly highbrow behavior... Chill out and let others
speak
their minds without being berated by you.

M

actually he is easy to get rid off, just reply but leave sci.agriculture
off the newsgroups and he never notices. Probably comes from him being
so highbrow.


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'