Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:03:03 +0000, Vox Humana wrote:
....but if there is some new stringent return policy at HD, that is yet another reason to shop elsewhere. The problem that these stores have is not with someone buying extra nuts and bolts and returning what's not used, but with equipment. I know a guy who's very proud of the fact that every fall he "buys" a ladder from Lowes, cleans out his gutters, then returns the ladder. No worries about cost, storage, etc. I have heard that HD (and others) are modifying their return policies to try to put a stop to that kind of abuse. Hard to fault them for that. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:03:03 +0000, Vox Humana wrote:
....but if there is some new stringent return policy at HD, that is yet another reason to shop elsewhere. The problem that these stores have is not with someone buying extra nuts and bolts and returning what's not used, but with equipment. I know a guy who's very proud of the fact that every fall he "buys" a ladder from Lowes, cleans out his gutters, then returns the ladder. No worries about cost, storage, etc. I have heard that HD (and others) are modifying their return policies to try to put a stop to that kind of abuse. Hard to fault them for that. |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
"Joe Sandlin" wrote in message news On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:03:03 +0000, Vox Humana wrote: ....but if there is some new stringent return policy at HD, that is yet another reason to shop elsewhere. The problem that these stores have is not with someone buying extra nuts and bolts and returning what's not used, but with equipment. I know a guy who's very proud of the fact that every fall he "buys" a ladder from Lowes, cleans out his gutters, then returns the ladder. No worries about cost, storage, etc. I have heard that HD (and others) are modifying their return policies to try to put a stop to that kind of abuse. Hard to fault them for that. I have no problem with that. They should have explained the new policy instead of trying to put some spin on it that provided no information. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
"Joe Sandlin" wrote in message news On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:03:03 +0000, Vox Humana wrote: ....but if there is some new stringent return policy at HD, that is yet another reason to shop elsewhere. The problem that these stores have is not with someone buying extra nuts and bolts and returning what's not used, but with equipment. I know a guy who's very proud of the fact that every fall he "buys" a ladder from Lowes, cleans out his gutters, then returns the ladder. No worries about cost, storage, etc. I have heard that HD (and others) are modifying their return policies to try to put a stop to that kind of abuse. Hard to fault them for that. I have no problem with that. They should have explained the new policy instead of trying to put some spin on it that provided no information. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:31:44 +0000, Wishy13764 wrote:
I suppose 'same sex' marriage is the cause of over 50% divorce rate? Same sex is the problem with my marraige. It's the SAME SEX over and over and over...... |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:31:44 +0000, Wishy13764 wrote:
I suppose 'same sex' marriage is the cause of over 50% divorce rate? Same sex is the problem with my marraige. It's the SAME SEX over and over and over...... |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
|
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
Subject: Home Depot politics
From: Bill R Date: 7/27/2004 10:47 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: Zemedelec wrote: Maybe this is much too off topic zemedelec It is and it shouldn't be posted here. There are dozens and dozens of political groups. Post your views in one of them. I don't see why it shouldn't be posted here. Politics, especially environmental policies, have some relevance. While I don't personally care which party Home Despot supports, I don't see any reason people should not be allowed to talk about it. - theoneflasehaddock |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
Subject: Home Depot politics
From: Bill R Date: 7/27/2004 10:47 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: Zemedelec wrote: Maybe this is much too off topic zemedelec It is and it shouldn't be posted here. There are dozens and dozens of political groups. Post your views in one of them. I don't see why it shouldn't be posted here. Politics, especially environmental policies, have some relevance. While I don't personally care which party Home Despot supports, I don't see any reason people should not be allowed to talk about it. - theoneflasehaddock |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
Subject: Home Depot politics
From: Bill R Date: 7/27/2004 10:47 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: Zemedelec wrote: Maybe this is much too off topic zemedelec It is and it shouldn't be posted here. There are dozens and dozens of political groups. Post your views in one of them. I don't see why it shouldn't be posted here. Politics, especially environmental policies, have some relevance. While I don't personally care which party Home Despot supports, I don't see any reason people should not be allowed to talk about it. - theoneflasehaddock |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Same Sex Marriages, (was: Home Depot politics)
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:52:35 GMT, "Vox Humana" wrote:
(snip) I agree completely. I found it interesting that Gov. Romney suggested that the government get out of the marriage business and simply issues civil union certificates to everyone, leaving "marriage" to religious institutions. This is probably the only time I will ever agree with him. I do think that would be the very best solution. As you point out, religious sects are not required to marry everyone who shows up with a license. Most churches decide who they will marry and what those people have to do to qualify for marriage in that church. Orthodox Jews don't recognize marriages between Jews and gentiles, nor are priestly lines of orthodox Jews able to marry converts. In doing some research on this subject, I found that there is a movement in the fundamentalist Christian world that also thinks the state should remove itself from the marriage business. They reason that marriages are an institution of the church and the state has no right requiring that people get a license before being able to receive a holy sacrament. Madalyn Murray O'Hair used to call those licenses "Sex Licenses", since that was all they really allowed you to do that you couldn't do before. You could live together without being married and it wasn't a problem, and you could eat together, and you could pretty much do everything else together, as long as you didn't have sex, so all you needed the license for was to have sex. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Same Sex Marriages, (was: Home Depot politics)
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:52:35 GMT, "Vox Humana" wrote:
(snip) I agree completely. I found it interesting that Gov. Romney suggested that the government get out of the marriage business and simply issues civil union certificates to everyone, leaving "marriage" to religious institutions. This is probably the only time I will ever agree with him. I do think that would be the very best solution. As you point out, religious sects are not required to marry everyone who shows up with a license. Most churches decide who they will marry and what those people have to do to qualify for marriage in that church. Orthodox Jews don't recognize marriages between Jews and gentiles, nor are priestly lines of orthodox Jews able to marry converts. In doing some research on this subject, I found that there is a movement in the fundamentalist Christian world that also thinks the state should remove itself from the marriage business. They reason that marriages are an institution of the church and the state has no right requiring that people get a license before being able to receive a holy sacrament. Madalyn Murray O'Hair used to call those licenses "Sex Licenses", since that was all they really allowed you to do that you couldn't do before. You could live together without being married and it wasn't a problem, and you could eat together, and you could pretty much do everything else together, as long as you didn't have sex, so all you needed the license for was to have sex. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
HA HA Budys Here wrote:
As with any policy, there will always be someone who figures out how to abuse it, or circumvent it. I saw a woman try to retun a 1/2 dead flat of annuals. It was very early in the season and we had a frost. She had planted them and dug them back up post-mortum. They wouldn't allow the return, because the flat was sold as a flat, not the few individual plants she wanted credit for. I was glad HD stuck to their guns, but, if I were a lawyer, I'd claim they did at the time, have banners all over proclaiming "Satisfaction Guranteed or your money back." No conditions, no "*" followed by fine print. Taken to the letter, if I were to purchase a lawn mower and become dissatisfied 3 years into use, i *should* be able to return it, no? It's very true that no matter how many restrictions you put on your return policy, eventually someone will find ways to abuse it. The trick is to find a policy that you can use as a selling point, without loosing more than you're gaining with it. A certain technology company offers paid support at $xx an incident, or you can buy annual contracts for $xxx-$xxx, depending on how much you want covered. The per-incident charge can't be reversed if they fix the problem, but they provide a 30-day full refund for the annual contracts, even if you've made a call to tech support every day. There are lots of advantages to the 30-day return policy. Most people who call weren't even aware that these programs were available, and haven't had a chance to evaluate whether the price is worth it. But they have an immediate problem they need solved. The return policy gives them the chance to make what could be considered an impulse buy, but they now get a 30-day cooling-off period. Of course you already know what happens. People call in and buy annual contracts to avoid paying an charge for the single incident. When the company rolled-out the return policy, they knew some people would do that. The policy wasn't created by idiots. But the numbers they ran said that the additional sales of annual contracts they could make because of the policy outweighed the amount of revenue lost to people who find the loophole. Retail stores that have the "no questions asked" return policies know that they're going to spend more giving money to people who should have been asked to justify their returns, but they believe that they are making additional sales because of the policy. This is especially good for hardware items. Some people will still return that extra nut and bolt they grabbed, but many people won't. And, more importantly, given the choice of going someplace that'll take back the excess bought, and someplace that all sales are final, people will go to the place with the better return policy -- especially people like contractors who can be repeat customers. People returning using and ladders could be a problem. The guy who cleans out his gutters, and brings it back is a sale lost. But the guy who bought a 14' ladder, got home, got the job halfway done, and realized he needed an 18' ladder instead is different. A store credit, allowing the guy to buy that 18' ladder, might be a good solution, but what if the store doesn't have 18' ladders? Who's going to decide which customer has a valid reason for returning something, and which doesn't? What criteria will they use? How much will it cost to train people to apply the standards fairly and consistently? How many sales will be lost because potential customers won't buy because the return policy isn't liberal enough? How many customers will walk out the door scared away by an angry customer complaining (loudly) that the store won't take a return? Sometimes the bottom line is served best by having an outrageously liberal return policy that is obviously abusable. Sometimes the bottom line is served best with a "no returns" policy. The bigger the company, the more they've likely pondered the return policy, and it's big-picture effects. And it is the big picture that counts whether you're Sears, Home Depot, or Joe's Dollar Store. You can't focus on that guy who just left the store with a refund he didn't deserve. -- Warren H. ========== Disclaimer: My views reflect those of myself, and not my employer, my friends, nor (as she often tells me) my wife. Any resemblance to the views of anybody living or dead is coincidental. No animals were hurt in the writing of this response -- unless you count my dog who desperately wants to go outside now. Blatant Plug: Books for the Pacific Northwest gardener: http://www.holzemville.com/mall/nwgarden/index.html |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Home Depot politics
HA HA Budys Here wrote:
As with any policy, there will always be someone who figures out how to abuse it, or circumvent it. I saw a woman try to retun a 1/2 dead flat of annuals. It was very early in the season and we had a frost. She had planted them and dug them back up post-mortum. They wouldn't allow the return, because the flat was sold as a flat, not the few individual plants she wanted credit for. I was glad HD stuck to their guns, but, if I were a lawyer, I'd claim they did at the time, have banners all over proclaiming "Satisfaction Guranteed or your money back." No conditions, no "*" followed by fine print. Taken to the letter, if I were to purchase a lawn mower and become dissatisfied 3 years into use, i *should* be able to return it, no? It's very true that no matter how many restrictions you put on your return policy, eventually someone will find ways to abuse it. The trick is to find a policy that you can use as a selling point, without loosing more than you're gaining with it. A certain technology company offers paid support at $xx an incident, or you can buy annual contracts for $xxx-$xxx, depending on how much you want covered. The per-incident charge can't be reversed if they fix the problem, but they provide a 30-day full refund for the annual contracts, even if you've made a call to tech support every day. There are lots of advantages to the 30-day return policy. Most people who call weren't even aware that these programs were available, and haven't had a chance to evaluate whether the price is worth it. But they have an immediate problem they need solved. The return policy gives them the chance to make what could be considered an impulse buy, but they now get a 30-day cooling-off period. Of course you already know what happens. People call in and buy annual contracts to avoid paying an charge for the single incident. When the company rolled-out the return policy, they knew some people would do that. The policy wasn't created by idiots. But the numbers they ran said that the additional sales of annual contracts they could make because of the policy outweighed the amount of revenue lost to people who find the loophole. Retail stores that have the "no questions asked" return policies know that they're going to spend more giving money to people who should have been asked to justify their returns, but they believe that they are making additional sales because of the policy. This is especially good for hardware items. Some people will still return that extra nut and bolt they grabbed, but many people won't. And, more importantly, given the choice of going someplace that'll take back the excess bought, and someplace that all sales are final, people will go to the place with the better return policy -- especially people like contractors who can be repeat customers. People returning using and ladders could be a problem. The guy who cleans out his gutters, and brings it back is a sale lost. But the guy who bought a 14' ladder, got home, got the job halfway done, and realized he needed an 18' ladder instead is different. A store credit, allowing the guy to buy that 18' ladder, might be a good solution, but what if the store doesn't have 18' ladders? Who's going to decide which customer has a valid reason for returning something, and which doesn't? What criteria will they use? How much will it cost to train people to apply the standards fairly and consistently? How many sales will be lost because potential customers won't buy because the return policy isn't liberal enough? How many customers will walk out the door scared away by an angry customer complaining (loudly) that the store won't take a return? Sometimes the bottom line is served best by having an outrageously liberal return policy that is obviously abusable. Sometimes the bottom line is served best with a "no returns" policy. The bigger the company, the more they've likely pondered the return policy, and it's big-picture effects. And it is the big picture that counts whether you're Sears, Home Depot, or Joe's Dollar Store. You can't focus on that guy who just left the store with a refund he didn't deserve. -- Warren H. ========== Disclaimer: My views reflect those of myself, and not my employer, my friends, nor (as she often tells me) my wife. Any resemblance to the views of anybody living or dead is coincidental. No animals were hurt in the writing of this response -- unless you count my dog who desperately wants to go outside now. Blatant Plug: Books for the Pacific Northwest gardener: http://www.holzemville.com/mall/nwgarden/index.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sodium Grow Light from Home Depot | Gardening | |||
Shade cloth at Home Depot? | Orchids | |||
Rose bushes at Home Depot | Gardening | |||
Salt at Home Depot or Lowes? | Ponds | |||
whats' the chroma 50 bulb from wall mart or home depot | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |