Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Jaszewski wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:29:45 GMT, "Travis" wrote: I use insecticides on ornamentals Indicative of your displayed garden talents... To kill the aphids. -- Travis in Shoreline (just North of Seattle) Washington USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 5 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:17:31 GMT, "Travis"
wrote: Tom Jaszewski wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:29:45 GMT, "Travis" wrote: I use insecticides on ornamentals Indicative of your displayed garden talents... To kill the aphids. which also kills the ladybeetles, or at the very best, kills their food so they don't have the opportunity to kill the aphids in natural selection. victoria |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:17:31 GMT, "Travis"
wrote: To kill the aphids. LOL insecticides for aphids? You're kidding, right? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
In article , X-No-Archive: yes
wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:54:36 GMT, "Travis" wrote: Tom Jaszewski wrote: There is never any point in a discussion with you when you've dug yourself in. Consider reading the introductory page of the last "Compost Science and Utilization. Where exactly are the peer reviewed articles? Interesting bunch here...peer review is valid unless we're discussing Monsanto and round up..... I always give the highest authority to peer review science when the topic of the dangers of glyphosate arises. So don't shift your "science is worthless" values onto people who do value it. There is plenty of peer-reviewed science on compost teas. Vendors of compost teas prefer their own sales pitches for good reason. Join Paggers in remaining clueless...or read... http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/PDF/...-tea-notes.pdf -- Get your Paghat the Ratgirl T-Shirt he http://www.paghat.com/giftshop.html "In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot." -Thomas Jefferson |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In article , X-No-Archive: yes
wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:54:36 GMT, "Travis" wrote: Tom Jaszewski wrote: There is never any point in a discussion with you when you've dug yourself in. Consider reading the introductory page of the last "Compost Science and Utilization. Where exactly are the peer reviewed articles? Interesting bunch here...peer review is valid unless we're discussing Monsanto and round up..... Join Paggers in remaining clueless...or read... http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/PDF/...-tea-notes.pdf Unfortunately the main "authority" used by the politically duped folks at ATTRA is Elaine R. Ingham, the crackpot who was bounced around from college to college unable to win tenure until she was asked to resign from her final position for using University of Oregon fascilities to promote her private business of selling compost tea. Her misrepresentations are numerous & ATTRA has leapt in as pre-believers who didn't compare Ingham's faked data with actual field studies. Although to be fair, ATTRA has not collectively produced this literature, it is strictly promo literature by one man, Steve Diver, who seems to have bamboozled the naifs at ATTRA into actually breaking the law & putting their funding at risk. Diver is a friend & business associate of Ingham. He's obviously approached compost tea as a religion, & taken Ingham as his priestess -- because it is hard work to avoid the actual data as he has done. Diver says of Ingham's self-published promotional booklet on which he bases his information, "I highly recommend this mannual," & throughout the text cites & paraphrases Ingham as the primary authority -- not for scientific data (for which there is none to support her claims) but Diver just writes promotionally, as in this choice turn of phrase: "Dr. Elaine Ingham, a microbial ecologist, has elevated our collective knowledge of the soil foodweb," even incorporating Ingham's personal, invented titles (a doctor of microbial ecology, gimme a break), which is entirely promo-jargon. He even works in her company name, Soil Foodweb in a most novel context. One has to give Diver credit for not promoting his own tapes at the same time; he does sell them. Diver might be a reliable source of OTHER agricultural information, but for compost tea is merely a vendor promotor. He has elsewhere posted advertisements on the web & in newsgroups for such things as Ingham's $50 slide & video set for others who want (like himself) to give presentations & sell compost tea products. A typical example of his Ingham promotion appears he http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture/2003-January/017161.html Nowhere does Diver ever cite the peer-reviewed evidence, for the same reason Ingham dares not do so. Bare in mind that the best scientific data available on the very slight but actual values of compost teas do not find that aerated teas are in any way superior, & in some ways inferior -- these promotions are for aerated teas because they require expensive equipment & it's a profitable scam. A true believer in compost teas, rather than a scoundrel out for a buck, would be showing how the pricy equipment is a complete waste of money. So even as believers go, Diver was ENTIRELY the wrong gent to be providing information for ATTRA to deposit on line exclusively & illegally to promote specific vendors of worthless products, rather than show fellow believers how to do it better for free. Diver's other major "authority" is BBC Laboratories which is a sciency sounding name for yet another vendor of compost teas. All the information ATTRA fobs off on the public is vendor-provided. By law ATTRA is not permitted to advertise or endorse specific products, companies, or individuals. In promoting Ingham, her business, & even including photographs of the recommended products, the ATTRA articles on compost tea are actually illegal. I will forward this post to ATTRA & to relevant congressmen, as they've definitely stepped over the line repeatedly promoting Ingham's business & products, which they wouldn't've been permitted to do even if she weren't a known crackpot & falsifier of data. But it's lucky for you you found Ingham paraphrased as it would seem you've finally joined the ranks of the many vendors rightly embarrassed by their former Vendor Goddess & no longer willing to cite her directly, but only through her main remaining advocate. I'm sure it still stings that you mistakenly posted in this ng, in failed support of Ingham & compost teas, her paranoid replies to why actual field research keeps failing to support her claims. She went totally loony inventing that idiotic story about the REASON field tests show aerated teas have no effect on pathogens is because the researchers sneak into the fields at night and POISON THEIR PLANTS ON PURPOSE so that the scientific evidence will be negative & against compost tea effectiveness. I also liked her stuff about scientists having a a secret "HIDDEN AGENDA" so nefarious & sinister she cannot make sense of it even to herself let alone to her letter's readers. This really is like a schizophrenic pretty convinced of things no matter how great the disconnect from reality. But what is certain, in Ingham's world, you can't trust the scientists -- you can trust only herself & other vendors for the truth. She further claimed in that posted letter that her research WOULD be forthcoming in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. She lied. It remains exclusively self-published promotional literature. She not only fabricates data, she fabricates her own educational background, taken to task by Dr. James Moore when she claimed to have done some of her research at his side. She later said it was a completely different James Moore, some chap who mows golf courses, but that seems to have been another of her Invisible Playmates since no lawn-mowing "Dr." Moore has ever come forward to substantiate her diluted claim. It's unfortunate that greenies at ATTRA, who should know better, have embraced Ingham's laughable & entirely vendor-oriented pretend-research which has been rejected from every peer-reviewed agricultural journal so that she has to publish leaving out testable data. It's tragic that ATTRA would lend its organization name to Steve Divers merelyh to put the stamp of approval on a crazy woman like Ingham & ignore all actual research. And I use the word "crazy" advisedly since Ingham has shown a tendency toward paranoid delusions & conspiracy theories when confronted by actual research data. Anyone who wants to believe the myths will naturally be drawn AWAY from the peer reviewed science & to this crackpot's notorious promotional literature. I will separately repost a bit of our old discussion of Ingham form the last time you talked yourself into a painted corner searching your heart out for any real science & lighting exclusively on Crazy Ingham. Anyone who just wants to sell the products, like Divers & I would guess yourself, will also not care that Ingham fabricates data, fabricates her expertise, & self-publishes her non-science after failing to convince any peer-reviewed agricultural journal to take her seriously. -paggers -- Get your Paghat the Ratgirl T-Shirt he http://www.paghat.com/giftshop.html "In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot." -Thomas Jefferson |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
In article , X-No-Archive: yes
wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:54:36 GMT, "Travis" wrote: Tom Jaszewski wrote: There is never any point in a discussion with you when you've dug yourself in. Consider reading the introductory page of the last "Compost Science and Utilization. Where exactly are the peer reviewed articles? Interesting bunch here...peer review is valid unless we're discussing Monsanto and round up..... Join Paggers in remaining clueless...or read... http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/PDF/...-tea-notes.pdf Tomski, you've done a good job in finding a paraphrase of Elaine Ingham's self-published promo literature for her compost tea company. You've as always done a terrible job of providing even moderately credible data of scientific origin. As promised, here is the: REPOST WITH RELEVANT LINKS ON DR. INGHAM, HER FELLOW VENDORS' BEST-LOVED "EXPERT" ON COMPOST TEA: Vendor Ingham posing as a scientific researcher set the standard for vendor-disseminated information. Ingham seems legitimately to have been mentally ill with some paranoid conspiracy theories on why her data couldn't be duplicated in any actual field study, so after several years of being a Big Cheese in a crooked industry, she finally became such an embarrassment she was by many simply cast to the wolves with some of her fellow vendors asserting that her tendency to falsification is an abberation & not the industry standard. She is not an aberration, & her "findings" are still the only ones the industry promulgates whether or not they attach her name to them. The data to date supports compost teas as a tepid fertilizer & nothing more; its ability to enhance microorganisms is equal to the ability of regular watering to do so. Furthermore, though the vendors want you to believe aerating the tea is best & "safer" because non-aerated tea might be toxic, the few studies that indicate an unpredictable (so impractical) ability to deter disease as a foliar spray applies only to non-aerated teas. And it turns out aerated teas are MORE apt to contain harmful pathogens, rather than less apt as vendors of pricy equipment pretend, often on the basis of fraudulant sales-oriented "research" by the likes of Ingham. Vendors want you to believe teas need aeration so that duped marks will pay $500 to $1,000 for special equipment to do for a high price what could be done for free & with no such equipment. By & large the whole fad for garden teas is hokum & what little good teas do is exceeded by any number of better metheds, such as organic compost topcoatings & sensible irrigation. And while the tepid fertilizer value of compost teas washes out of the soil with the first rain or the first regular watering, maintaining the soil with compost or leafmold topcoatings or other methods is a longlasting method. If you have a compost barrel that saves the drippings, it does no harm to use that as the basis of a cost-free tea. But anyone spending money on equipment & tea mixes with the expectation that it is anything but the weakest possible fertilizer, they're duped marks & nothing more In sum: 1) As a tepid fertilizer, okay, even though of less value than virtually any other method of soil restoration or improvement. 2) For disease control: it's an illusion. To quote University of Washington horitulturist Dr. Chalker-Scott: "In the peer-reviewed literature field-tested compost tea reported no difference in disease control between compost tea & water." 3) Never believe anything promulgated by vendors. There is no such thing as an honest garden tea vendor since the honest thing would be not to take people's money for useless equipment. It is ONLY profitable because bolstered with lies. For assessment of the Lies of vendors vs the Realities, see: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.gardens/msg/3e740acc9cd1e1d2?dmode=source For definitively wasteful & potentially harmful nature of teas, see: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.gardens/msg/4d3a210350839b0d?dmode=source How the fraud is perpetuated through half-truths & lies & workshops at nurseries all on the worst level of hucksterism: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.gardens/msg/409e0c1292fe4656?dmode=source My old report on Ingham's "tradition needs no science" looniness & paranoia, written a few months before the embarrassed industry began to jettison her as their chief divinity: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.gardens/msg/955f80727de46b92?dmode=source Ingham's easily lampooned loony-tunes letter that publicly revealed her magical anti-science thinking & her paranoid state of mind: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.gardens/msg/ff945350d678f297?dmode=source Any website invested in selling you stuff is not going to provide you with the actual data of compost teas harming ground water, leaching too quickly out of soils to be of any benefit, being in every regard inferior to a topcoating of mulching organic compost, NOT improving the microorganism content of soils, NOT repairing anaerobic soils, and for the most part not even hindering pathogenic organisms (no more than would a good soaking with pure water in any case). Not everything labeled "organic" is a good or useful thing. Anyone who uses good organic compost & a regular watering schedule is doing much more for their garden than can be done with organic tea, & organic tea would not add anything additional, so it is a wasted inevestment of time & money & electricity (since vendors allege it has to be aerated), & even the cheaply made expensively sold plastic brewing equipment these flimflam artists foist on the public are manufactured at the highest level of pollution & waste with none of it being necessary. The pro-Chemical lobby just hates it when "ecofundies" refuse to believe cancerous toxic chemicals are good for us & go all insane in defense of their PetroChemical fetish. It's unfortunate that greenies get just as fetishistic & up in arms when their favorite organic fad is found out to be 99.9% flimflam. -paggers -- Get your Paghat the Ratgirl T-Shirt he http://www.paghat.com/giftshop.html "In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot." -Thomas Jefferson |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Jaszewski wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:17:31 GMT, "Travis" wrote: To kill the aphids. LOL insecticides for aphids? You're kidding, right? Bayer Rose and Flower Care. Feeds and protects against insects in one easy step. Aphids are one of the insects it kills. -- Travis in Shoreline (just North of Seattle) Washington USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 5 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
In article vUiAe.5489$ao6.2781@trnddc05, "Travis"
wrote: Tom Jaszewski wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:29:45 GMT, "Travis" wrote: I use insecticides on ornamentals Indicative of your displayed garden talents... To kill the aphids. Travis, you're getting sidetracked. Now Tom'll be able to make fun of your for implying insecticides are necessary to get rid of aphids. You missed entirely that in response to your request for scientific data favorable to compost tea, he provided promotional literature derived from crazy Elaine Ingham, who fabricates data strictly to promote her compost tea company. Tom's "best" science is vendor indoctrinating literature. By slight of hand he persistently avoids actual data & supplants it with vendor promo pieces by the likes of Steve Diver & Elaine Ingham. I don't use insecticides & a little surprised you do. Very curiously, I've just never needed them! If I did come up against somethiung that couldn't be handled organically, I might be tempted by nasty toxins, who knows, but so far organic methods have been totally successful, while some of my chums who are not organic in their gardening approach have insect troubles all the time no matter how many chemicals they slather on everything. -paghat the ratgirl -- Get your Paghat the Ratgirl T-Shirt he http://www.paghat.com/giftshop.html "In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot." -Thomas Jefferson |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
In article 8KzAe.39943$ZN6.397@trnddc02, "Travis"
wrote: Bayer Rose and Flower Care. Feeds and protects against insects in one easy step. Aphids are one of the insects it kills. Disulfoton is in that. Bad stuff. Even for non-organic gardeners, aphids are so easily gotten rid of it is not a great idea to use something extremely toxic to control a problem that a couple drops of dishwashing soap in water would do just as easily. Disulfoton is killing lots of benificial insects, for a net loss to the garden rather than a net gain. It contaminates water, injures fish & birds & mammals, is a carcinogen. I imagine the label warns not to use it anywhere near anything harvested to eat, & one reason to have roses is the rosehips are very useful in the kitchen. Are you convinced the roses would go all to hell if you didn't use such a product? -paghat the ratgirl -- Get your Paghat the Ratgirl T-Shirt he http://www.paghat.com/giftshop.html "In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot." -Thomas Jefferson |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
paghat wrote:
In article , X-No-Archive: yes wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:54:36 GMT, "Travis" wrote: Tom Jaszewski wrote: There is never any point in a discussion with you when you've dug yourself in. Consider reading the introductory page of the last "Compost Science and Utilization. Where exactly are the peer reviewed articles? Interesting bunch here...peer review is valid unless we're discussing Monsanto and round up..... Join Paggers in remaining clueless...or read... http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/PDF/...-tea-notes.pdf Unfortunately the main "authority" used by the politically duped folks at ATTRA is Elaine R. Ingham, the crackpot who was bounced around from college to college unable to win tenure until she was asked to resign from her final position for using University of Oregon fascilities to promote her private business of selling compost tea. Her misrepresentations are numerous & ATTRA has leapt in as pre-believers who didn't compare Ingham's faked data with actual field studies. Although to be fair, ATTRA has not collectively produced this literature, it is strictly promo literature by one man, Steve Diver, who seems to have bamboozled the naifs at ATTRA into actually breaking the law & putting their funding at risk. Diver is a friend & business associate of Ingham. He's obviously approached compost tea as a religion, & taken Ingham as his priestess -- because it is hard work to avoid the actual data as he has done. Diver says of Ingham's self-published promotional booklet on which he bases his information, "I highly recommend this mannual," & throughout the text cites & paraphrases Ingham as the primary authority -- not for scientific data (for which there is none to support her claims) but Diver just writes promotionally, as in this choice turn of phrase: "Dr. Elaine Ingham, a microbial ecologist, has elevated our collective knowledge of the soil foodweb," even incorporating Ingham's personal, invented titles (a doctor of microbial ecology, gimme a break), which is entirely promo-jargon. He even works in her company name, Soil Foodweb in a most novel context. One has to give Diver credit for not promoting his own tapes at the same time; he does sell them. Diver might be a reliable source of OTHER agricultural information, but for compost tea is merely a vendor promotor. He has elsewhere posted advertisements on the web & in newsgroups for such things as Ingham's $50 slide & video set for others who want (like himself) to give presentations & sell compost tea products. A typical example of his Ingham promotion appears he http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture/2003-January/017161.html Nowhere does Diver ever cite the peer-reviewed evidence, for the same reason Ingham dares not do so. Bare in mind that the best scientific data available on the very slight but actual values of compost teas do not find that aerated teas are in any way superior, & in some ways inferior -- these promotions are for aerated teas because they require expensive equipment & it's a profitable scam. A true believer in compost teas, rather than a scoundrel out for a buck, would be showing how the pricy equipment is a complete waste of money. So even as believers go, Diver was ENTIRELY the wrong gent to be providing information for ATTRA to deposit on line exclusively & illegally to promote specific vendors of worthless products, rather than show fellow believers how to do it better for free. Diver's other major "authority" is BBC Laboratories which is a sciency sounding name for yet another vendor of compost teas. All the information ATTRA fobs off on the public is vendor-provided. By law ATTRA is not permitted to advertise or endorse specific products, companies, or individuals. In promoting Ingham, her business, & even including photographs of the recommended products, the ATTRA articles on compost tea are actually illegal. I will forward this post to ATTRA & to relevant congressmen, as they've definitely stepped over the line repeatedly promoting Ingham's business & products, which they wouldn't've been permitted to do even if she weren't a known crackpot & falsifier of data. But it's lucky for you you found Ingham paraphrased as it would seem you've finally joined the ranks of the many vendors rightly embarrassed by their former Vendor Goddess & no longer willing to cite her directly, but only through her main remaining advocate. I'm sure it still stings that you mistakenly posted in this ng, in failed support of Ingham & compost teas, her paranoid replies to why actual field research keeps failing to support her claims. She went totally loony inventing that idiotic story about the REASON field tests show aerated teas have no effect on pathogens is because the researchers sneak into the fields at night and POISON THEIR PLANTS ON PURPOSE so that the scientific evidence will be negative & against compost tea effectiveness. I also liked her stuff about scientists having a a secret "HIDDEN AGENDA" so nefarious & sinister she cannot make sense of it even to herself let alone to her letter's readers. This really is like a schizophrenic pretty convinced of things no matter how great the disconnect from reality. But what is certain, in Ingham's world, you can't trust the scientists -- you can trust only herself & other vendors for the truth. She further claimed in that posted letter that her research WOULD be forthcoming in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. She lied. It remains exclusively self-published promotional literature. She not only fabricates data, she fabricates her own educational background, taken to task by Dr. James Moore when she claimed to have done some of her research at his side. She later said it was a completely different James Moore, some chap who mows golf courses, but that seems to have been another of her Invisible Playmates since no lawn-mowing "Dr." Moore has ever come forward to substantiate her diluted claim. It's unfortunate that greenies at ATTRA, who should know better, have embraced Ingham's laughable & entirely vendor-oriented pretend-research which has been rejected from every peer-reviewed agricultural journal so that she has to publish leaving out testable data. It's tragic that ATTRA would lend its organization name to Steve Divers merelyh to put the stamp of approval on a crazy woman like Ingham & ignore all actual research. And I use the word "crazy" advisedly since Ingham has shown a tendency toward paranoid delusions & conspiracy theories when confronted by actual research data. Anyone who wants to believe the myths will naturally be drawn AWAY from the peer reviewed science & to this crackpot's notorious promotional literature. I will separately repost a bit of our old discussion of Ingham form the last time you talked yourself into a painted corner searching your heart out for any real science & lighting exclusively on Crazy Ingham. Anyone who just wants to sell the products, like Divers & I would guess yourself, will also not care that Ingham fabricates data, fabricates her expertise, & self-publishes her non-science after failing to convince any peer-reviewed agricultural journal to take her seriously. -paggers Please keep us updated with regard to the congresspersons and ATTRA's response. -- Travis in Shoreline (just North of Seattle) Washington USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 5 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
paghat wrote:
In article vUiAe.5489$ao6.2781@trnddc05, "Travis" wrote: Tom Jaszewski wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:29:45 GMT, "Travis" wrote: I use insecticides on ornamentals Indicative of your displayed garden talents... To kill the aphids. Travis, you're getting sidetracked. Now Tom'll be able to make fun of your for implying insecticides are necessary to get rid of aphids. You missed entirely that in response to your request for scientific data favorable to compost tea, he provided promotional literature derived from crazy Elaine Ingham, who fabricates data strictly to promote her compost tea company. Tom's "best" science is vendor indoctrinating literature. By slight of hand he persistently avoids actual data & supplants it with vendor promo pieces by the likes of Steve Diver & Elaine Ingham. I don't use insecticides & a little surprised you do. Very curiously, I've just never needed them! If I did come up against somethiung that couldn't be handled organically, I might be tempted by nasty toxins, who knows, but so far organic methods have been totally successful, while some of my chums who are not organic in their gardening approach have insect troubles all the time no matter how many chemicals they slather on everything. -paghat the ratgirl I only use it on roses. It is all gone now and won't buy any more next year. I do use Neem oil and another Bayer product to try to control mites on my bamboo. If anyone knows the secret to controlling or eradicating bamboo mites *please* let me know. Thanks -- Travis in Shoreline (just North of Seattle) Washington USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 5 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
paghat wrote:
In article 8KzAe.39943$ZN6.397@trnddc02, "Travis" wrote: Bayer Rose and Flower Care. Feeds and protects against insects in one easy step. Aphids are one of the insects it kills. Disulfoton is in that. Bad stuff. Even for non-organic gardeners, aphids are so easily gotten rid of it is not a great idea to use something extremely toxic to control a problem that a couple drops of dishwashing soap in water would do just as easily. Disulfoton is killing lots of benificial insects, for a net loss to the garden rather than a net gain. It contaminates water, injures fish & birds & mammals, is a carcinogen. I imagine the label warns not to use it anywhere near anything harvested to eat, & one reason to have roses is the rosehips are very useful in the kitchen. Are you convinced the roses would go all to hell if you didn't use such a product? -paghat the ratgirl See my other post. -- Travis in Shoreline (just North of Seattle) Washington USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 5 |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:39:40 GMT, "Travis"
wrote: I only use it on roses. It is all gone now and won't buy any more next year. I do use Neem oil and another Bayer product to try to control mites on my bamboo. If anyone knows the secret to controlling or eradicating bamboo mites *please* let me know. Thanks Proper watering, cultivation, fertilization, and hygiene. If you have mites on your bamboo, they are in some major type of stress. Major. Victoria |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to slow down a fast growing hedge | United Kingdom | |||
Slow release Fertilizer | Orchids | |||
Watermelon growing slow | Edible Gardening | |||
Yellowing and Slow Growing Pepper Plants | Edible Gardening | |||
Slow growing plants | Ponds |