| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#17
19-10-2006, 01:20 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
In message , Sacha
writes On 19/10/06 11:16, in article , "June Hughes" wrote: In message , Stan The Man writes Thank-you. As I only have copies of two emails from Judith to Sacha at present, I really don't think that is enough. I am heartily sick of all this squabbling between these people and have been marking several threads here as read without opening them until yesterday evening when I returned home from work to find an email from Sacha enclosing a copy of the first email from Judith to her. Which Judith asked me to send you, telling you she would take no emails from you, as you have been working against her 'and others' behind her their backs and with Puke. They are the only two I have seen. As for your other ridiculous thread posting headers, what exactly are you intending to prove? This must be taking an awful lot of your time. Do you actually do any work at all, or are you a kept woman? BTW the people who said here that you would be back were right. Exactly what you said about Puce. -- June Hughes |
|
#18
19-10-2006, 01:21 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
"Sacha" wrote in message
... On 19/10/06 08:30, in article , "June Hughes" wrote: In message et, Sally Thompson writes On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:15:43 +0100, June Hughes wrote (in article ): In message .com, La Puce writes June Hughes wrote: If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails. Ask her to send them to you as a proof. Snip I am rather embarrassed to say, I can't find Judith's email address in my address book, which I can't understand. I notice from another thread that she appears to have left urg, so hope that some kind soul will forward this to her. I have Judith's email address (and I'm sure so have others), but I really don't want to upset her any further than she has already been upset by repeating the posting you are referring to. Is your email valid? If you like, I can email Judith and ask her to contact you direct. Yes, of course my email address is valid. Judith already has it. I am given to understand that a series of emails have been circulated stating that I am 'in cahoots' (to use one person's phrase) with Puce. There has been NO series of emails circulated about you. Quite the contrary! Only one person has contacted Judith about you - Puke. It is Puke who told Judith that several people have discussed Judith 'and others' by email with her. She has named those people to Judith and you are one of them. I TOLD YOU THAT PLAINLY. The ONLY person who has been emailing anyone else about you is Puke. There is no 'group' discussing you. Puke has betrayed your part in this entire saga to Judith. If you go after anyone, it should be Puke but I expect you're too scared she'll publish your emails here. YOU have emailed ME at leas 6 times, asking me to pass on messages to Judith and I have, at her request, sent you Judith's replies. I told you, as I have told one other co-conspirator of yours and Puke's, that Judith will not receive or send emails to any of the people Puke has named to her. She is very shaken and distressed by the slurs Puke has put upon her and wants nothing to do with the sort of people that make a friend out of something like Puke. I can't blame her. snip Wriggle how you like, you and Puke and your other correspondents are responsible for what has happened to this group. But don't lie and pretend there has been a group discussing you. Look to Puke to see who has let you down. Good bye and good luck. You need it. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ Well goodness gracious me. Just as I said, here's Hubbard back :-)) Mike right again :-) The truth ALWAYS prevails :-)) |
|
#19
19-10-2006, 01:32 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
"June Hughes" wrote in message
... In message , Sacha They are the only two I have seen. As for your other ridiculous thread posting headers, what exactly are you intending to prove? This must be taking an awful lot of your time. Do you actually do any work at all, or are you a kept woman? Have you seen her posting record????? :-(( Toooooooooooooooooooo much time on her hands. BTW the people who said here that you would be back were right. Exactly what you said about Puce. -- June Hughes The truth always prevails :-)) As I said, she is unable to leave it 'cos it's 'her newsgroup' Mike -- .................................................. ......... Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rnshipmates.co.uk www.nsrafa.com |
|
#20
19-10-2006, 01:34 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
Sacha wrote: Yes, telling you that it is your friend, Puke, who has emailed Judith about you. Be careful, June, you're tying yourself in yet more knots. I still have all the emails to and from you and am filing them. You see, I don't trust you either. It is Puke who told Judith that several people have discussed Judith 'and others' by email with her. First I haven't emailed Judith about June beside responding to her crazy email. Post them. Go on, I dare you to post them. You're tying yourself in knots here Hubbard. Why would I write to Judith about June? What for? To achieve what? When and why? Please post your proof. We're waiting. Second you are trying to confuse June who's sweet, but not stupid. I'm not sure if you have realised that you've solely posted her emails to you to ask what is happening, with no contents as well, but you haven't posted any emails you got from Judith. That should be seen too, if you want your story to stand. Third I have never wrote to Judith, beside responding to her. I'd rather have a lobotomy. The woman is spooky and I knew that months ago. We're not meant to be friends - she's a world appart. She doesn't garden as we know it. She just potters and asks stupid questions to stay in touch with her friends here and organise meets and gold sleepers evenings. So don't you even try this one on me. Fourth and final - I'm going now. I am quite upset to see decent folks being attacked by you. Some lovely chaps and chappettes on here are the back bones of this group. You are not. You've poked at June before and you know that she cannot handle things like this. You're cruel Hubbard and a manipulative cow if I may add. See, no mention of labias, sorry there. What I've realised whilst you've been gone for a couple of errr .... hours, it's that who I've missed the most is Ray, your husband  ))As I've said to a few of you, I'm taking a break from urg. See you all in the spring where I'm sure I'll enjoy reading some of you folks again. And Hubbard, don't be a bullie. Post your proofs. Some are waiting to find out the truth. A bientot. |
|
#21
19-10-2006, 01:46 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
In message om, La
Puce writes Sacha wrote: Yes, telling you that it is your friend, Puke, who has emailed Judith about you. Be careful, June, you're tying yourself in yet more knots. I still have all the emails to and from you and am filing them. You see, I don't trust you either. It is Puke who told Judith that several people have discussed Judith 'and others' by email with her. First I haven't emailed Judith about June beside responding to her crazy email. Post them. Go on, I dare you to post them. You're tying yourself in knots here Hubbard. Why would I write to Judith about June? What for? To achieve what? When and why? Please post your proof. We're waiting. Second you are trying to confuse June who's sweet, but not stupid. I'm not sure if you have realised that you've solely posted her emails to you to ask what is happening, with no contents as well, but you haven't posted any emails you got from Judith. That should be seen too, if you want your story to stand. Third I have never wrote to Judith, beside responding to her. I'd rather have a lobotomy. The woman is spooky and I knew that months ago. We're not meant to be friends - she's a world appart. She doesn't garden as we know it. She just potters and asks stupid questions to stay in touch with her friends here and organise meets and gold sleepers evenings. So don't you even try this one on me. Fourth and final - I'm going now. I am quite upset to see decent folks being attacked by you. Some lovely chaps and chappettes on here are the back bones of this group. You are not. You've poked at June before and you know that she cannot handle things like this. That is where you are wrong. snip -- June Hughes |
|
#22
19-10-2006, 01:53 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
On 19/10/06 13:20, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote: In message , Sacha writes On 19/10/06 11:16, in article , "June Hughes" wrote: In message , Stan The Man writes Thank-you. As I only have copies of two emails from Judith to Sacha at present, I really don't think that is enough. I am heartily sick of all this squabbling between these people and have been marking several threads here as read without opening them until yesterday evening when I returned home from work to find an email from Sacha enclosing a copy of the first email from Judith to her. Which Judith asked me to send you, telling you she would take no emails from you, as you have been working against her 'and others' behind her their backs and with Puke. They are the only two I have seen. Do you think twisting the truth is going to get you out of this? I forwarded to you every email Judith asked me to send. But you know and I know that I have received god alone knows how many from you, clearly panicking and twisting in the wind and hoping to use me as a conduit to Judith. This morning your tone changed 100% from regret and a hope to make things better to your usual belligerence when you can't get your own way and are shown up as you are. IOW, your computer and Puke's must have been white hot last night and early this morning, while you were instructed on what to say and how to wiggle out of your part in the vicious behaviour meted out to me, Judith and Janet. You're in this up to your neck and you know it. As for your other ridiculous thread posting headers, what exactly are you intending to prove? This must be taking an awful lot of your time. Do you actually do any work at all, or are you a kept woman? Nobody keeps me, June. Let's just say there's no need for that. But how seriously common of you - a qualified accountant, I believe - to query how other people fund their lives. Unethical too, I shouldn't wonder, especially on a public newsgroup. I wonder what your professional body would think of such things - breaches of confidence aren't smiled upon in your job, are they? BTW the people who said here that you would be back were right. Exactly what you said about Puce. Amazing. No wonder you told me in email that you wouldn't repudiate what Puke has said on here - you can't. She really has got you over a barrel. Puke came back to lie and swear to at and about someone I respect and like very much. So I'm here only to make sure you don't get away with your lie that you are the victim of an email conspiracy and that Judith is turned, by you, into a villain. There is no such conspiracy because to be honest, you're just not that important. It's amazing how you always have to portray yourself that way and take the starring role - unsuccessfully. Your reputation for starting email correspondences with people, working your way from conciliatory to belligerent and thus to "don't speak to me again" is absolutely legendary - and here we are, you're doing it again. Perhaps you've been instructed to draw the flak away from Puke....... Don't worry, I'll leave the giving of gardening advice to you and Puke. Should be worth a ringside seat. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ |
|
#23
19-10-2006, 02:26 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
|
|
#24
19-10-2006, 02:44 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
In message , Sacha
writes On 19/10/06 13:20, in article , "June Hughes" wrote: In message , Sacha writes On 19/10/06 11:16, in article , "June Hughes" wrote: In message , Stan The Man writes Thank-you. As I only have copies of two emails from Judith to Sacha at present, I really don't think that is enough. I am heartily sick of all this squabbling between these people and have been marking several threads here as read without opening them until yesterday evening when I returned home from work to find an email from Sacha enclosing a copy of the first email from Judith to her. Which Judith asked me to send you, telling you she would take no emails from you, as you have been working against her 'and others' behind her their backs and with Puke. They are the only two I have seen. Do you think twisting the truth is going to get you out of this? I forwarded to you every email Judith asked me to send. I have received only two containing Judith's mails to you. So you are lying, aren't you? But you know and I know that I have received god alone knows how many from you, clearly panicking and twisting in the wind and hoping to use me as a conduit to Judith. This morning your tone changed 100% from regret I regret and have regretted nothing. and a hope to make things better to your usual belligerence when you can't get your own way and are shown up as you are. Excuse me? The only person who is being shown up is you. You came over to uk.food+drink.misc last week being all friendly and asked for a recipe. I gave one to you and you were still friendly. What a fool I was to think you would continue in that vein. IOW, your computer and Puke's must have been white hot last night and early this morning, On the contrary, I turned off my computer and went out, just as I told you I was going to. while you were instructed on what to say No-one instructs me what to say. Can't you see what a fool you are making of yourself? and how to wiggle out of your part in the vicious behaviour meted out to me, Judith and Janet. You're in this up to your neck and you know it. I am not. I have done nothing to, and emailed nothing about Judith to anyone except you last evening. There has been no reason for me to do so. As for your other ridiculous thread posting headers, what exactly are you intending to prove? This must be taking an awful lot of your time. Do you actually do any work at all, or are you a kept woman? Nobody keeps me, June. Let's just say there's no need for that. But how seriously common of you - a qualified accountant, I believe - to query how other people fund their lives. Unethical too, I shouldn't wonder, especially on a public newsgroup. Not at all. I wonder what your professional body would think of such things - breaches of confidence aren't smiled upon in your job, are they? You are now on very dangerous ground. I have breached no confidences at all. Are you really as unintelligent as you make out? My professional body has ways of dealing with people like you. BTW the people who said here that you would be back were right. Exactly what you said about Puce. Amazing. No wonder you told me in email that you wouldn't repudiate what Puke has said on here - you can't. She really has got you over a barrel. Grow up! You are a bitter and twisted , moaning nag. I can just imagine your blood pressure boiling over as you type. You had better calm down a bit for the sake of your health. As for your sanity, I think there is no hope of any improvement. Puke came back to lie and swear to at and about someone I respect and like very much. So I'm here only to make sure you don't get away with your lie that you are the victim of an email conspiracy and that Judith is turned, by you, into a villain. I am very disappointed and hurt that Judith would even think I would say anything about her to Puce or anyone else. I emailed Judith this morning and told her that. There is no such conspiracy because to be honest, you're just not that important. And you are? That is incredible. Mrs Big! It's amazing how you always have to portray yourself that way and take the starring role - unsuccessfully. G Aren't you talking about yourself there? You have always had a penchant for being a drama queen on urg. Your reputation for starting email correspondences with people, working your way from conciliatory to belligerent and thus to "don't speak to me again" is absolutely legendary - and here we are, you're doing it again. Perhaps you've been instructed to draw the flak away from Puke...... I understand Puce has left the group. She wrote in another thread asking for me to divulge who the first person to write to me was. I don't think there is any need for me to reply, do you? . Don't worry, I'll leave the giving of gardening advice to you and Puke. Should be worth a ringside seat. You are very boring and predictable. What's new? -- June Hughes |
|
#25
19-10-2006, 03:09 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:53:07 +0100, Sacha wrote:
Nobody keeps me, June. Let's just say there's no need for that. But how seriously common of you - a qualified accountant, I believe - to query how other people fund their lives. Unethical too, I shouldn't wonder, especially on a public newsgroup. I wonder what your professional body would think of such things - breaches of confidence aren't smiled upon in your job, are they? Watch it, June, she's serious (and seriously weird) I do not necessarily subscribe to the view that she is quite capable, out of sheer frustrated malice, of trying to destroy you or anyone else that crosses her but it might be advisable not to turn your back on her in a Tesco car park/ |
|
#26
19-10-2006, 03:15 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
"June Hughes" wrote in message
... You are very boring and predictable. What's new? -- June Hughes and bossy? Mike -- .................................................. ......... Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rnshipmates.co.uk www.nsrafa.com |
|
#27
19-10-2006, 04:10 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
On Oct 19, 4:15 pm, "Mike" wrote: "June Hughes" wrote in .. . You are very boring and predictable. What's new? -- June Hughesand bossy? Mike -- .................................................. ........ Royal Naval Electrical Branch Associationwww.rnshipmates.co.ukwww.nsrafa.com Incidentally, you complain about Sachas' posts containg her business web sites, but, forgive me if I'm wrong, don't all yours, as above. Mike (never in the Navy) |
|
#28
19-10-2006, 04:32 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
"Mike in Spain" wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 19, 4:15 pm, "Mike" wrote: "June Hughes" wrote in .. . You are very boring and predictable. What's new? -- June Hughesand bossy? Mike -- .................................................. ........ Royal Naval Electrical Branch Associationwww.rnshipmates.co.ukwww.nsrafa.com Incidentally, you complain about Sachas' posts containg her business web sites, but, forgive me if I'm wrong, don't all yours, as above. Mike (never in the Navy) I don't post with the aim of making money. I am retired and do this as a hobby which actually COSTS me money, but I do give others pleasure when they find their old friends and shipmates AND, now, because I am involved with the RAF (ask Hubbard all about that. She has it wrong but to her that is of no consequence), I am giving them the chance to find those they served with as well. Now if you see that as something wrong. I feel very very sorry for you. If you live in Eastbourne, watch your local press to see how I stand up for the ex Service people. Making money? I already pay tax on my pension so do not wish to 'make more'. Ask Hubbard why she posts with her Market Garden advert is in her sig time after time after time after time after time etc etc etc And then come back and explain :-((( Anything else to say? Mike -- .................................................. ......... Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association www.rnshipmates.co.uk www.nsrafa.com |
|
#29
19-10-2006, 04:50 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
In message , Mike
writes I don't post with the aim of making money. I am retired and do this as a hobby which actually COSTS me money, but I do give others pleasure when they find their old friends and shipmates AND, now, because I am involved with the RAF (ask Hubbard all about that. She has it wrong but to her that is of no consequence), I am giving them the chance to find those they served with as well. Now if you see that as something wrong. I feel very very sorry for you. If you live in Eastbourne, watch your local press to see how I stand up for the ex Service people. Making money? I already pay tax on my pension so do not wish to 'make more'. Ask Hubbard why she posts with her Market Garden advert is in her sig time after time after time after time after time etc etc etc I thought the charter said you can post your website, business email address etc in your sig.? I know Sacha has been nasty to me lately but am sure that in this case, she has done nothing wrong. I remember many years ago Sacha having the Garden Pharmacy in her sig but that is different and was a long time ago. Just like when Puce claimed to be a company director and turned out to be just that. -- June Hughes |
|
#30
19-10-2006, 05:08 PM
posted to uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
|
la puce and Judith
On 19 Oct 2006 08:10:40 -0700, "Mike in Spain"
wrote: On Oct 19, 4:15 pm, "Mike" wrote: "June Hughes" wrote in .. . You are very boring and predictable. What's new? June Hughesand bossy? Mike Royal Naval Electrical Branch Associationwww.rnshipmates.co.ukwww.nsrafa.com Incidentally, you complain about Sachas' posts containg her business web sites, but, forgive me if I'm wrong, don't all yours, as above. Mike (never in the Navy) Forgive me, have I missed something? Or have you? Is the website you cite trying to get you to buy something? Sacha advertises. Mike (in the Navy) seems merely to be sharing a non-commercial site with anyone of like interest. Does the difference escape you? or is everything the sainted Sacha does automatically handed down as inscriptions on stone tablets by the ancients? Nemo |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Dendrobium Judith - Dendrobium Judith-a.jpg | Garden Photos | |||
| La Puce | United Kingdom | |||
| Saca "stalking" Puce (was Looking for Ways to Annoy the Neighbors) | United Kingdom | |||
| Puce Again (was Looking for Ways to Annoy the Neighbors) | United Kingdom | |||
| Re raised bed Jenny Le Puce & Mike | United Kingdom | |||
![Sacha[_1_] is offline](https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
