Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
I have just received an email which suggests that Helene has said I have
emailed things to her about Judith. I have known Judith a very long time on the internet and would not do such a thing. I have sympathised with Helene in the past because I think people have got at her unnecessarily but why bring Judith into it? If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. -- June Hughes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
June Hughes wrote: If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails. Ask her to send them to you as a proof. I honestly don't have any time for this woman any longer and that's what drives her mad. She only wish I'd do something that she could hang on to. She started talking about my company - I riposted about hers. Only fair. The problem is that she just doesn't want to stop. When I was having grief by Janet, she emailed me a nice email to put myself together and ignore her. It was nice, but I felt she was 'ordering' me about. When we had further rows, she emailed me again with a kind of maternal tone ... I didn't reply. I then felt she was a little strange .... She emailed me as you've seen - and that's that. I've forwarded her email last week to two people in here because frankly I thought it was really over the top. She rang my office many times June. I've had to informed everybody to ignore her. I even rang my old colleagues in London, just in case. Be friendly with her by no means, but let me out of this sinister drama. It's getting very silly. I've said lots of things and I don't regret a word, not a single word. The rude words that came out of Sacha are absolutely not in line with what I meant. I'm not like that. Never. And I'm sadden to see that it's gone so far actually. Sadden to see nice chaps like Dave Poole and others feeling a little at the deep end with the RIP title Janet gave to her thread. Honestly. Nobody has died. Lets move on. Please lets get on, simply lets get on.... Don't get involved please June. I'm done with this now. Truly I am. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
In message .com, La
Puce writes June Hughes wrote: If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails. Ask her to send them to you as a proof. Snip I am rather embarrassed to say, I can't find Judith's email address in my address book, which I can't understand. I notice from another thread that she appears to have left urg, so hope that some kind soul will forward this to her. -- June Hughes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
In message .com, La
Puce writes June Hughes wrote: If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails. Ask her to send them to you as a proof. I honestly don't have any time for this woman any longer and that's what drives her mad. She only wish I'd do something that she could hang on to. She started talking about my company - I riposted about hers. Only fair. The problem is that she just doesn't want to stop. When I was having grief by Janet, she emailed me a nice email to put myself together and ignore her. It was nice, but I felt she was 'ordering' me about. When we had further rows, she emailed me again with a kind of maternal tone ... I didn't reply. I then felt she was a little strange .... She emailed me as you've seen - and that's that. I've forwarded her email last week to two people in here because frankly I thought it was really over the top. She rang my office many times June. I've had to informed everybody to ignore her. I even rang my old colleagues in London, just in case. Be friendly with her by no means, but let me out of this sinister drama. It's getting very silly. I've said lots of things and I don't regret a word, not a single word. The rude words that came out of Sacha are absolutely not in line with what I meant. I'm not like that. Never. And I'm sadden to see that it's gone so far actually. Sadden to see nice chaps like Dave Poole and others feeling a little at the deep end with the RIP title Janet gave to her thread. Honestly. Nobody has died. Lets move on. Please lets get on, simply lets get on.... Don't get involved please June. I'm done with this now. Truly I am. I am now very confused. -- June Hughes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
June Hughes wrote: I am now very confused. But who emailed you that I've said things about Judith to you?! Who?! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:15:43 +0100, June Hughes wrote
(in article ): In message .com, La Puce writes June Hughes wrote: If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails. Ask her to send them to you as a proof. Snip I am rather embarrassed to say, I can't find Judith's email address in my address book, which I can't understand. I notice from another thread that she appears to have left urg, so hope that some kind soul will forward this to her. I have Judith's email address (and I'm sure so have others), but I really don't want to upset her any further than she has already been upset by repeating the posting you are referring to. Is your email valid? If you like, I can email Judith and ask her to contact you direct. -- Sally in Shropshire, UK |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
In message et, Sally
Thompson writes On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:15:43 +0100, June Hughes wrote (in article ): In message .com, La Puce writes June Hughes wrote: If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails. Ask her to send them to you as a proof. Snip I am rather embarrassed to say, I can't find Judith's email address in my address book, which I can't understand. I notice from another thread that she appears to have left urg, so hope that some kind soul will forward this to her. I have Judith's email address (and I'm sure so have others), but I really don't want to upset her any further than she has already been upset by repeating the posting you are referring to. Is your email valid? If you like, I can email Judith and ask her to contact you direct. Yes, of course my email address is valid. Judith already has it. I am given to understand that a series of emails have been circulated stating that I am 'in cahoots' (to use one person's phrase) with Puce. I have not had the advantage of seeing any of them. I am unsure as to the ins and outs of the laws of libel regarding email but am very unhappy about what appear to be several people - mainly ladies - with too much time on their hands writing derogatory things about me behind my back. That is not what urg is about. If I find out the contents of these emails I shall vigorously pursue whatever legal course of action is available to me if they are in any way libellous, which if the person advising me of them is correct, I think they may be. -- June Hughes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
June Hughes wrote: In message et, Sally Thompson writes On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:15:43 +0100, June Hughes wrote (in article ): In message .com, La Puce writes June Hughes wrote: If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails. Ask her to send them to you as a proof. Snip I am rather embarrassed to say, I can't find Judith's email address in my address book, which I can't understand. I notice from another thread that she appears to have left urg, so hope that some kind soul will forward this to her. I have Judith's email address (and I'm sure so have others), but I really don't want to upset her any further than she has already been upset by repeating the posting you are referring to. Is your email valid? If you like, I can email Judith and ask her to contact you direct. Yes, of course my email address is valid. Judith already has it. I am given to understand that a series of emails have been circulated stating that I am 'in cahoots' (to use one person's phrase) with Puce. I have not had the advantage of seeing any of them. I am unsure as to the ins and outs of the laws of libel regarding email but am very unhappy about what appear to be several people - mainly ladies - with too much time on their hands writing derogatory things about me behind my back. That is not what urg is about. If I find out the contents of these emails I shall vigorously pursue whatever legal course of action is available to me if they are in any way libellous, which if the person advising me of them is correct, I think they may be. The only thing to do with Helene is to completely ignore her. Please see demon.local subject "typoglycemia". She was a major contributor to the demise of sensible correspondence in that newsgroup. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
In message et, Sally
Thompson writes On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:15:43 +0100, June Hughes wrote (in article ): In message .com, La Puce writes June Hughes wrote: If this is untrue, I shall be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary. June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails. Ask her to send them to you as a proof. Snip I am rather embarrassed to say, I can't find Judith's email address in my address book, which I can't understand. I notice from another thread that she appears to have left urg, so hope that some kind soul will forward this to her. I have Judith's email address (and I'm sure so have others), but I really don't want to upset her any further than she has already been upset by repeating the posting you are referring to. Is your email valid? If you like, I can email Judith and ask her to contact you direct. I have now found Judith's email address on my system but am really now no longer interested in emailing her after I found out about the recent group of emails written about me. -- June Hughes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
In message , Sacha
writes There has been NO series of emails circulated about you. Quite the contrary! Only one person has contacted Judith about you - Puke. You sent me copies of two emails you had received from Judith - both about me. It is Puke who told Judith that several people have discussed Judith 'and others' by email with her. She has named those people to Judith and you are one of them. I TOLD YOU THAT PLAINLY. The ONLY person who has been emailing anyone else about you is Puke. There is no 'group' discussing you. Puke has betrayed your part in this entire saga to Judith. If you go after anyone, it should be Puke but I expect you're too scared she'll publish your emails here. Wriggle how you like, you and Puke and your other correspondents are responsible for what has happened to this group. But don't lie and pretend there has been a group discussing you. Look to Puke to see who has let you down. Good bye and good luck. You need it. I thought you had left? -- June Hughes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
In message , Stan The Man
writes In article , June Hughes wrote: I am unsure as to the ins and outs of the laws of libel regarding email but am very unhappy about what appear to be several people - mainly ladies - with too much time on their hands writing derogatory things about me behind my back. That is not what urg is about. If I find out the contents of these emails I shall vigorously pursue whatever legal course of action is available to me if they are in any way libellous, which if the person advising me of them is correct, I think they may be. It is certainly possible to sue for e-mail libel (Norwich Union were famously fined £450,000 a few years ago because an employee libelled a competitor in an e-mail) -- but your adviser should be ditched if he/she is telling you to go ahead and sue. The cost of bringing a libel case would be huge and you have no guarantee of success, or that the defendant can afford to pay your costs, let alone the damages (small as they would be unless you are Norwich Union). Thank-you. As I only have copies of two emails from Judith to Sacha at present, I really don't think that is enough. I am heartily sick of all this squabbling between these people and have been marking several threads here as read without opening them until yesterday evening when I returned home from work to find an email from Sacha enclosing a copy of the first email from Judith to her. -- June Hughes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
In article , June Hughes
wrote: I am unsure as to the ins and outs of the laws of libel regarding email but am very unhappy about what appear to be several people - mainly ladies - with too much time on their hands writing derogatory things about me behind my back. That is not what urg is about. If I find out the contents of these emails I shall vigorously pursue whatever legal course of action is available to me if they are in any way libellous, which if the person advising me of them is correct, I think they may be. It is certainly possible to sue for e-mail libel (Norwich Union were famously fined £450,000 a few years ago because an employee libelled a competitor in an e-mail) -- but your adviser should be ditched if he/she is telling you to go ahead and sue. The cost of bringing a libel case would be huge and you have no guarantee of success, or that the defendant can afford to pay your costs, let alone the damages (small as they would be unless you are Norwich Union). |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
la puce and Judith
On 19/10/06 11:16, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote: In message , Stan The Man writes In article , June Hughes wrote: I am unsure as to the ins and outs of the laws of libel regarding email but am very unhappy about what appear to be several people - mainly ladies - with too much time on their hands writing derogatory things about me behind my back. That is not what urg is about. If I find out the contents of these emails I shall vigorously pursue whatever legal course of action is available to me if they are in any way libellous, which if the person advising me of them is correct, I think they may be. It is certainly possible to sue for e-mail libel (Norwich Union were famously fined £450,000 a few years ago because an employee libelled a competitor in an e-mail) -- but your adviser should be ditched if he/she is telling you to go ahead and sue. The cost of bringing a libel case would be huge and you have no guarantee of success, or that the defendant can afford to pay your costs, let alone the damages (small as they would be unless you are Norwich Union). Thank-you. As I only have copies of two emails from Judith to Sacha at present, I really don't think that is enough. I am heartily sick of all this squabbling between these people and have been marking several threads here as read without opening them until yesterday evening when I returned home from work to find an email from Sacha enclosing a copy of the first email from Judith to her. Which Judith asked me to send you, telling you she would take no emails from you, as you have been working against her 'and others' behind her their backs and with Puke. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dendrobium Judith - Dendrobium Judith-a.jpg | Garden Photos | |||
La Puce | United Kingdom | |||
Saca "stalking" Puce (was Looking for Ways to Annoy the Neighbors) | United Kingdom | |||
Puce Again (was Looking for Ways to Annoy the Neighbors) | United Kingdom | |||
Re raised bed Jenny Le Puce & Mike | United Kingdom |