Sacha wrote:

But you are a fool. *Still* you persist in showing yourself up as both
foolish, devious, manipulative, mendacious and ridiculous. You've proved it
over and over again. However much you dig yourself into the mire you just
go on doing it.

And you insist on wrestling with a pig that any sensible person has
killfiled long since, and quoting them in case we missed anything....


Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic
Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G

On Nov 2, 3:50 pm, Martin wrote:
corner :-)

It's in Sacha's post.
--

I must have missed it.

Judith

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 05:47:01 -0700, wrote:
She didn't realised any
of it because she's sinile.

Your personal attacks say far more about you than the person you are
maligning.
And if you cannot even spell 'senile' then you are hardly qualified to
diagnose it.

On 2/11/07 16:41, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:37:41 +0000, Sacha
wrote:

On 2/11/07 16:21, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:16:01 +0000, Sacha
wrote:

On 2/11/07 15:41, in article
, "judith.lea"
wrote:

On Nov 2, 3:28 pm, Martin wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:03:51 +0000, Sacha

wrote:





On 2/11/07 14:41, in article
om, "judith.lea"
wrote:

On Nov 2, 2:38 pm, Sacha wrote:
On 2/11/07 13:59, in article
. com, "Dave Poole"

wrote:
On Nov 2, 12:47 pm, wrote:

As I've posted before, Sacha had written about this lavender before,
had asked Olivier before. I had talked to Olivier in the french
garden
forum in February, along to other people.

Lavender? Where are we going now? If you can't keep track of this
long enough to get the plant names between a few messages in the same
thread, how on earth are we to believe any claims you make about a
supposed discussion you might have had back in February.

Even if I did forget that I'd posted a photo of it obviously, given
the
recent reactions, so did a lot of other people! ;-) I'm still trying
to
figure out what my crime is, though. At least I knew I was looking at
a
rosemary..... ;-)
snip

--
Sachahttp://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'

I enjoyed the photo, I am staggered by the size of it though. I have
a friend at the JI, I wonder if it would be worth sending him a
cutting?

Judith

Do you want to email me about it? If Ray has some small plants I could
send
one or if not, get some more cuttings next time we're over there. One
suggestion I've received from someone knowledgeable about rosemaries is
the
notion that this could be a sport of 'Severn Seas', a particularly
'clingy'
type, though not usually as long. I wonder......

Salcombe Rosemarie, the sailors friend?
--

Martin- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Martin!!!! Go and sit in the corner :-)

Judith

Quite good though, you must admit. ;-))

No confusing her with Lavender or Hyacinth.

BTW what did you mean to write?

Primrose.

Nothing to do with the Severn bore?

;-) No idea. You'd expect it to be Seven Seas but it's not, it's Severn.
Strange name but there must be a reason for it.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'

On 2/11/07 16:45, in article ,
"Jennifer Sparkes" wrote:

The message
from Sacha contains these words:

On 2/11/07 16:21, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

No confusing her with Lavender or Hyacinth.

BTW what did you mean to write?

Primrose.

No, no you are both wrong,
Violet - the shrinking Violet! )

Jennifer

Was that the one with a swimming pool and room for a pony? ;-))

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'

On 2/11/07 16:44, in article ,
"Gary Woods" wrote:

Sacha wrote:

But you are a fool. *Still* you persist in showing yourself up as both
foolish, devious, manipulative, mendacious and ridiculous. You've proved it
over and over again. However much you dig yourself into the mire you just
go on doing it.

And you insist on wrestling with a pig that any sensible person has
killfiled long since, and quoting them in case we missed anything....


Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic
Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G

Sorry Gary but so far today we've had David is an alcoholic and I'm senile.
I am not clear as to why anyone should get away with that poison-spreading.
But yes, finally - the kill file is my friend in this area!
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'

Martin wrote:
I thought it was a typo. Sorry!

Please learn how to snip your posts! Two secrres full for a 1 liner is
b****** frustrating!

pk

"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
On 2/11/07 16:44, in article ,
"Gary Woods" wrote:

Sacha wrote:

But you are a fool. *Still* you persist in showing yourself up as both
foolish, devious, manipulative, mendacious and ridiculous. You've proved
it
over and over again. However much you dig yourself into the mire you
just
go on doing it.

And you insist on wrestling with a pig that any sensible person has
killfiled long since, and quoting them in case we missed anything....


Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at
home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic
Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G

Sorry Gary but so far today we've had David is an alcoholic and I'm
senile.
I am not clear as to why anyone should get away with that
poison-spreading.
But yes, finally - the kill file is my friend in this area!
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'


I was branded a purveyor of porn and dodgy business ventures by the same
woman. You, me and David could really set the world on fire.

"Rupert (W.Yorkshire)" writes


"Puke"
Well that is the name of something that most people find repulsive and vile.
I don't think David is far off the mark.

That may be true, but name calling is not a particularly clever way of
arguing, nor one which readily helps newcomers recognise the validity of
your case.
--
Kay

On 2 Nov, 17:01, wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 05:47:01 -0700, wrote:
She didn't realised any
of it because she's sinile.

Your personal attacks say far more about you than the person you are
maligning.
And if you cannot even spell 'senile' then you are hardly qualified to
diagnose it.

)) Mais je suis francaise, qu'est ce que tu veux! Sinile est sinile,
voila. Et toi qui es tu cache derriere ton ordinateur, hein?!
Jardiner? Jardiniere? Certainement pas....

On 2/11/07 19:39, in article , "K"
wrote:

"Rupert (W.Yorkshire)" writes


"Puke"
Well that is the name of something that most people find repulsive and vile.
I don't think David is far off the mark.

That may be true, but name calling is not a particularly clever way of
arguing, nor one which readily helps newcomers recognise the validity of
your case.

You will, of course, be making that remark to Helene Rudlin, too, won't you,
Kay? In the interests of newcomers, of course, not those who've been
helping others for years.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'

On 2 Nov, 19:21, "Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)"
wrote:
I was branded a purveyor of porn and dodgy business ventures by the same
woman. You, me and David could really set the world on fire.- Hide quoted text -

)) Ruppert, now now, or should it be Craig? Or what about Jim? And
my favourite one 'Sid Smut'. Remember the thread Why not Terra of
Jenna? C'mon RuppertCraigJim, I wasn't born yesterday. Show us your
garden and then lets talk.

In message , Sacha
writes
On 2/11/07 19:39, in article , "K"
wrote:

"Rupert (W.Yorkshire)" writes


"Puke"
Well that is the name of something that most people find repulsive and vile.
I don't think David is far off the mark.

That may be true, but name calling is not a particularly clever way of
arguing, nor one which readily helps newcomers recognise the validity of
your case.

You will, of course, be making that remark to Helene Rudlin, too, won't you,
Kay? In the interests of newcomers, of course, not those who've been
helping others for years.

I think the old saying about "two wrongs not making a right" applies
here. While I see the provocation, and understand the temptation, the
name calling is neither ethical nor productive. It may be
counterproductive; firstly it makes it harder for the casual reader to
tell who is on the side of the angels; and secondly it helps the
recipients self-misperception as an innocent victim.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley

Martin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:13:26 -0000, "p.k."
wrote:


Please learn how to snip your posts! Two secrres full for a 1 liner
is b****** frustrating!

Try using a spelling checker.

I'd spent enough time trawling through the garbage for the one liner!

Normal Newsgroup courtesy is to trim posts of unnecessary verbiage.

pk

On Nov 2, 9:20 pm, "p.k." wrote:
Martin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:13:26 -0000, "p.k."
wrote:

Please learn how to snip your posts! Two secrres full for a 1 liner
is b****** frustrating!

Try using a spelling checker.

I'd spent enough time trawling through the garbage for the one liner!

Normal Newsgroup courtesy is to trim posts of unnecessary verbiage.

pk

Yes, it is, but Martin is a courteous poster and the occasional lapse
doesn't worry me. I would much rather see him post without snipping
than not at all.

Judith