Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
Hello All. The extraordinary gales whistling through Shropshire from Wales several weeks ago were too much for the thin 18-foot conifer in this photo. http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...ind-tunnel.jpg This conifer just could not withstand the wind and once the gales subsided it was left standing about 30 degrees from vertical! (It was easy enough to straighten it up again, largely by stamping heavily on the ground on the side from which the wind had hit it.) As this tree is only going to grow taller and thicker and encounter greater difficulty in the gales of each autumn and spring, it seems to me I only have two solutions: 1. Keep it at its current height and support the three with a diagonal post from behind, so that while the top may bend backwards (temporarily) in harsh winds, the root system won't be pulled at again, and once the winds stop the tree will be left fully vertical again. 2. Reduce it to a height of about six feet, and trim its branches, IF this kind of conifer will accept such cutting and IF it will then bush and fill itself in. What do you advise? Is there another solution? There's another conifer, of a different sort, nearby, which is currently only 6 feet high and which will grow into a very high and wide tree if I let it, but that cannot be because of proximity to the house. However I know that it is one of those conifers that you CAN trim and shape and it will "bush". But as for this one (in the photo), I have no idea. Many thanks, Eddy. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
Eddy wrote in news:Yrqcp.104126
: Hello All. The extraordinary gales whistling through Shropshire from Wales several weeks ago were too much for the thin 18-foot conifer in this photo. http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...ey/treeinwind- tunnel.jpg This conifer just could not withstand the wind and once the gales subsided it was left standing about 30 degrees from vertical! (It was easy enough to straighten it up again, largely by stamping heavily on the ground on the side from which the wind had hit it.) As this tree is only going to grow taller and thicker and encounter greater difficulty in the gales of each autumn and spring, it seems to me I only have two solutions: 1. Keep it at its current height and support the three with a diagonal post from behind, so that while the top may bend backwards (temporarily) in harsh winds, the root system won't be pulled at again, and once the winds stop the tree will be left fully vertical again. 2. Reduce it to a height of about six feet, and trim its branches, IF this kind of conifer will accept such cutting and IF it will then bush and fill itself in. What do you advise? Is there another solution? There's another conifer, of a different sort, nearby, which is currently only 6 feet high and which will grow into a very high and wide tree if I let it, but that cannot be because of proximity to the house. However I know that it is one of those conifers that you CAN trim and shape and it will "bush". But as for this one (in the photo), I have no idea. Many thanks, Eddy. Very nice view of the whole scene, Eddy. I am envious, and if all you have to worry about is that tree I envy you more. I am no expert with trees, but isn't the tree in question very, or too close to the one on the right of it? How your garden must look in summer when in leaf! Is that little road separating you from your neighbour? or is it yours? Either way it is a dream. Caz(cas) Long suffering other half of Baz |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
On Mar 5, 2:17*pm, Sacha wrote:
On 2011-03-05 12:59:24 +0000, Eddy said: Hello All. The extraordinary gales whistling through Shropshire from Wales several weeks ago were too much for the thin 18-foot conifer in this photo. There's another conifer, of a different sort, nearby, which is currently only 6 feet high and which will grow into a very high and wide tree if I let it, but that cannot be because of proximity to the house. *However I know that it is one of those conifers that you CAN trim and shape and it will "bush". *But as for this one (in the photo), I have no idea. Many thanks, Eddy. I can't be at all sure from the photo but it looks to me like a Christmas tree. *Did you plant one out or did your predecessors? *With some exceptions, I'm no great fan of conifers and as this seems to be a rather wispy one, I'd get rid of it, if it were mine. -- Sachawww.hillhousenursery.com South Devon- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I just wonder why you want it. What are you hopeing it will do for you? It's not going to thicken much at the base, so is not going to help your privacy. I'd be inclined to get rid of it and to plant something more suitable |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 08:01:44 -0800 (PST), Dave Hill
wrote: On Mar 5, 2:17*pm, Sacha wrote: On 2011-03-05 12:59:24 +0000, Eddy said: Hello All. The extraordinary gales whistling through Shropshire from Wales several weeks ago were too much for the thin 18-foot conifer in this photo. There's another conifer, of a different sort, nearby, which is currently only 6 feet high and which will grow into a very high and wide tree if I let it, but that cannot be because of proximity to the house. *However I know that it is one of those conifers that you CAN trim and shape and it will "bush". *But as for this one (in the photo), I have no idea. Many thanks, Eddy. I can't be at all sure from the photo but it looks to me like a Christmas tree. *Did you plant one out or did your predecessors? *With some exceptions, I'm no great fan of conifers and as this seems to be a rather wispy one, I'd get rid of it, if it were mine. -- Sachawww.hillhousenursery.com South Devon- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I just wonder why you want it. What are you hopeing it will do for you? It's not going to thicken much at the base, so is not going to help your privacy. I'd be inclined to get rid of it and to plant something more suitable Yep, I'd have it out. But what on earth is it? I'm not sure that it /is/ a Norway spruce. For a moment I even thought it might be a larch, but saw that all the deciduous spp in the photo were dormant. -- Mike. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
On Mar 5, 12:59*pm, Eddy
wrote: Hello All. The extraordinary gales whistling through Shropshire from Wales several weeks ago were too much for the thin 18-foot conifer in this photo. http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...einwind-tunnel... This conifer just could not withstand the wind and once the gales subsided it was left standing about 30 degrees from vertical! *(It was easy enough to straighten it up again, largely by stamping heavily on the ground on the side from which the wind had hit it.) As this tree is only going to grow taller and thicker and encounter greater difficulty in the gales of each autumn and spring, it seems to me I only have two solutions: 1. *Keep it at its current height and support the three with a diagonal post from behind, so that while the top may bend backwards (temporarily) in harsh winds, the root system won't be pulled at again, and once the winds stop the tree will be left fully vertical again. 2. *Reduce it to a height of about six feet, and trim its branches, IF this kind of conifer will accept such cutting and IF it will then bush and fill itself in. What do you advise? Is there another solution? There's another conifer, of a different sort, nearby, which is currently only 6 feet high and which will grow into a very high and wide tree if I let it, but that cannot be because of proximity to the house. *However I know that it is one of those conifers that you CAN trim and shape and it will "bush". *But as for this one (in the photo), I have no idea. Many thanks, Eddy. I can't tell what it is from that picture but I do know that lovely spot deserves a much better plant. Preferably not an exotic conifer. You've still got a few weeks of the bare root planting season left. I'd get rid of the other conifer you mentioned as well, you'll be surprised how much garden will be liberate for something more interesting and suitable for the situation. Rod |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
"Eddy" wrote in message ... Hello All. The extraordinary gales whistling through Shropshire from Wales several weeks ago were too much for the thin 18-foot conifer in this photo. http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...ind-tunnel.jpg This conifer just could not withstand the wind and once the gales subsided it was left standing about 30 degrees from vertical! (It was easy enough to straighten it up again, largely by stamping heavily on the ground on the side from which the wind had hit it.) I had a conifer which was blown over by high winds and it never really recovered. Conifers have shallow plate roots and the feeder roots on the side that was lifted were torn. I believe transplanting conifers is difficult, if not impossible, due to the feeder roots being damaged in the attempt. Bill |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
Bill Grey wrote:
I had a conifer which was blown over by high winds and it never really recovered. Conifers have shallow plate roots and the feeder roots on the side that was lifted were torn. I believe transplanting conifers is difficult, if not impossible, due to the feeder roots being damaged in the attempt. Yes, this is certainly true for this particular conifer of ours. I moved it to where it is now because the previous owner had strapped it to the side of the house to save it from keeling over in the gales - and when I dug around it to see if transplanting would be possible, yes, I found the root system was not deep or extensive and moving it was simple. It's been in the new spot for three years now and it appears the roots have not extended in such a way as to anchor the tree against the force of the gales. Unfortunately there's no better sheltered spot on the whole property! Eddy. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
Rod wrote:
I can't tell what it is from that picture but I do know that lovely spot deserves a much better plant. Preferably not an exotic conifer. You've still got a few weeks of the bare root planting season left. I'd get rid of the other conifer you mentioned as well, you'll be surprised how much garden will be liberate for something more interesting and suitable for the situation. Thanks, Rod. Any suggestions as to replacements? We're 253 metres above sea-level here (cold in winter) and there's a great need for greenery in winter. Eddy. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
Sacha wrote:
I can't be at all sure from the photo but it looks to me like a Christmas tree. Did you plant one out or did your predecessors? With some exceptions, I'm no great fan of conifers and as this seems to be a rather wispy one, I'd get rid of it, if it were mine. Hi Sacha! Without getting my Expert Shrubs book out I can't give the name of this conifer - but it's one that grows very tall and narrow, though nowhere as dense as a cypress. Yes, I suppose it is rather "wispy", and this is because of harsh conditions, the cold and the wind here in winter. It is greener now than where the previous owners had it, strapped to the side of the house to help it withstand the winds! I hate destroying trees, hence my hope that if reduced to 6-foot and trimmed it might bush. Well, I suppose I can always just try and see. Would now not be the best time of year to do this. Or should I wait a month or two? Thanks, Sacha. Eddy. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:17:59 -0000, "Bill Grey"
wrote: "Eddy" wrote in message ... Hello All. The extraordinary gales whistling through Shropshire from Wales several weeks ago were too much for the thin 18-foot conifer in this photo. http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...ind-tunnel.jpg This conifer just could not withstand the wind and once the gales subsided it was left standing about 30 degrees from vertical! (It was easy enough to straighten it up again, largely by stamping heavily on the ground on the side from which the wind had hit it.) I had a conifer which was blown over by high winds and it never really recovered. Conifers have shallow plate roots and the feeder roots on the side that was lifted were torn. I believe transplanting conifers is difficult, if not impossible, due to the feeder roots being damaged in the attempt. Bill I have an Australian conifer that was blown over when it was about 15' high. It still had half the roots in the ground so it was stood up again and the roots were stamped down firmly. It is now about 60' high. When the wind is strong the tree bends over at very unnerving angles but, so far, the roots have not been pulled up. Steve -- EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. www.easynn.com SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. www.swingnn.com JustNN. Just Neural Networks. www.justnn.com Neural Planner Software. www.npsl1.com |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
I just wonder why you want it. What are you hopeing it will do for
you? It's not going to thicken much at the base, so is not going to help your privacy. I'd be inclined to get rid of it and to plant something more suitable Thanks for the reply, Dave. It sounds like you don't think this specimen WOULD bush, if halved in height and trimmed. Eddy. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
Mike Lyle wrote:
Yep, I'd have it out. But what on earth is it? I'm not sure that it /is/ a Norway spruce. For a moment I even thought it might be a larch, but saw that all the deciduous spp in the photo were dormant. Well, Mike, you've driven me round the house looking for the name of the thing! It's a "deodar" and they can grow to a height of 80 feet. So what I need to find out now is whether or not a deodar will bush, like the plicata for example. Eddy. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
Very nice view of the whole scene, Eddy.
I am envious, and if all you have to worry about is that tree I envy you more. I am no expert with trees, but isn't the tree in question very, or too close to the one on the right of it? How your garden must look in summer when in leaf! Is that little road separating you from your neighbour? or is it yours? Either way it is a dream. Thanks for helpful reply, Caz. Yes, it certainly is rather close to the three paper birches, which stand in a triangle just adjacent. But in winter when the birches are completely leafless the deodar provides a bit of green. All four trees help to somewhat hide an electricity pole from the view of the house. I've always known that the deodar would have to be nipped each year at its top to ensure it doesn't get too high - and interfere with electric cable and satellite reception - but now it's clear that even at the current height it can't withstand the wind. I've been surprised to read here so many responses saying, in effect, "Just get it out!" My problem is hating to end the life of any plant unless absolutely necessary, hence hoping somebody will say that deodars bush beautifully if trimmed and cut! :-) Eddy. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
I have an Australian conifer that was blown over when it was about 15' high. It still had half the roots in the ground so it was stood up again and the roots were stamped down firmly. It is now about 60' high. When the wind is strong the tree bends over at very unnerving angles but, so far, the roots have not been pulled up. Hi, Steve. Interesting info. Basically you suggest the possibility that if I could afford to pamper this deodar for a few more years its root system could get such a grip that from then on the tree could withstand all gales. The trouble is I can't afford to let this deodar get any higher than its current 18 feet, because of power lines and satellite dish interference. So the options are to keep it at 18 feet (in which case it will continue to suffer in the gales), or to reduce it to a much shorter bush. But will the thing cooperate with such a plan, that's the question! :-) Eddy. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Conifer keeling in "wind-tunnel"!
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 13:19:59 GMT, Eddy
wrote: Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: I have an Australian conifer that was blown over when it was about 15' high. It still had half the roots in the ground so it was stood up again and the roots were stamped down firmly. It is now about 60' high. When the wind is strong the tree bends over at very unnerving angles but, so far, the roots have not been pulled up. Hi, Steve. Interesting info. Basically you suggest the possibility that if I could afford to pamper this deodar for a few more years its root system could get such a grip that from then on the tree could withstand all gales. The trouble is I can't afford to let this deodar get any higher than its current 18 feet, because of power lines and satellite dish interference. So the options are to keep it at 18 feet (in which case it will continue to suffer in the gales), or to reduce it to a much shorter bush. But will the thing cooperate with such a plan, that's the question! :-) Eddy. Eddy, My mother planted the same sort of conifer as mine but she kept it trimmed down to about 10' As a result it has grown into a huge garden filling bush. None of the conifers have needed to be pampered and they grow very fast. I have never been able to identify the conifer, even after wading through a long list and pictures of Australian conifers. Steve -- EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. www.easynn.com SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. www.swingnn.com JustNN. Just Neural Networks. www.justnn.com Neural Planner Software. www.npsl1.com |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wind, wind and more wind. | United Kingdom | |||
Wind, gusty and then more wind and gusts | United Kingdom | |||
Wind, rain. More wind and rain forecast. | United Kingdom | |||
Wind Tunnel | Gardening | |||
dwarf conifer (wind burn) | United Kingdom |