Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Kay" wrote in message ... In article , lynd writes "Cerumen" wrote in message ... "Kay" wrote in message ... I doubt whether the OP cares a damn whether *I* can see it. The point I was making was that several ISPs trim off binaries so that the OP was posting in a way that made sure that a good number of those from whom he was seeking advice were not in a position to be able to give that advice. But I think the point here is not so mcu what people have said as the way they chose to say it? And again Kay, your choice of comment here reflects the approach. Its crass and rude and is off putting to all posters. Although it could be a reflection of modern times. let me offer a different example. In the past if someone had B.O. most people would have said nothing - just moved away ( in this internet context not responded). Others who could deal with the smell ( in this case can see the picture) would deal with it stoically. Someone may have politely taken that person aside and very gently tried to suggest that the person needs a deoderant or a wash ( perhaps in this context - *politely* suggesting that a different form of posting may be required). Now though someone just shouts out to the whole room " COR, YOU STINK!!!!!!" and possibly even worse add "P*SS O** ( the equivillent here being the remarks made by some) Its embarrassing to all and hurtful to the individual. Have we lost our manners? I make mistakes all the time - here typo's spelling mistakes, in life all sorts of things. I a just human. I know others make mistakes too - they are human. But some are "SO Perfect" that they choose to criticise and shout about the mistakes of others. There are two quotes from my childhood that come to mind ( both biblical actually) - I'll use the most modern paraphrase for the first: Dont criticise unless you want to be criticised. If you criticise the criticism that comes back will be more than that given out. How can you help remove a speck from your friends eye if you have a ruddy great big log in your own? and ( using the old translation) "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone". You have an interesting sig - pitty its not heeded by yourself here. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
There are net nannies with the touch of velvet, few and far between I am
afraid, then you have the net nanny on a par with Hitler's SS, the majority I am afraid. Of course these did have the advantage of not having to learn newsgroup netiquette as they were born with it. No learning curve with them. Possibly born with the skill to drive and didn't have any 'L' plates, that's why they are unable to tolerate those of us who unfortunately had to learn to drive, by being taught by someone else, and then have to take a test as I did on 25th July 1955. Mike |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
please see enclosed reply I sent to "Cerumin", I didn't think it was bad
enough to earn his response, but if my manner of writting is not what is expected at groups, I would appreciate any advice people can give. From: "C" To: "James Kelly" Subject: what is it? Date: 29 August 2004 20:00 Indeed how stupid of you not to first read the group before contributing even, as you will have seen, and hopefully learnt some groups welcome picture and are normally tagged "binary" others do not. I didn't block your picture my newsgroup server did because you broke the rules, you however seem not only to be a novice but an argumentative one and therefore I have now totally blocked you. You might learn how to use a spell checker as well it might make your emails and Usenet postings more accurate and readable. I see from your headers ""From: "James Kelly" To: "Cerumen" References: Subject: what is it? Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Status: U X-UIDL: 1093797262.11402.mail04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net, S=2857 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 version=2.64 X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 195.188.213.63 62.31.98.2"""" You use Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 that has a default spell check, try allowing it to do it's job. Goodbye ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Kelly" To: "Cerumen" Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 5:34 PM Subject: what is it? I'm sorry that you think blocking a picture of a plant is so great. Being a novice to computing I was unaware of the restrictions on getting information from what appeared to be a group on gardening, which afterall is a mainly visual experience. How stupid of me. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cerumen" Newsgroups: uk.rec.gardening Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 8:06 PM Subject: what is it? "Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... "jakell" wrote in message . uk... Can anyone tell me what this is.........Jakell Don't post graphics attachments to this ng, as this is a text-only newsgroup and many of the servers will strip the attachment from your post. My server seems to have blocked the entire original post thankfully. -- Chris Thomas West Cork Ireland "Cerumen" wrote in message ... "Kay" wrote in message ... In article , GOOD GOLLY MISS mOLLY writes "jakell" wrote in message .uk... Can anyone tell me what this is.........Jakell Yes it is a picture posted to a non binary newsgroup. Which a lot of us can't even see since our ISP removes them, so it's a bit self -defeating. I even got a rather snotty email from the original sender of the binary tonight complaining about my earlier post in this thread. Says they are a novice Usenet poster which seems obvious, also now an ignored novice. Novices should learn by their mistakes not criticise those who point them out? -- Chris Thomas West Cork Ireland |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"jakell" wrote in message . uk... please see enclosed reply I sent to "Cerumin", I didn't think it was bad enough to earn his response, but if my manner of writting is not what is expected at groups, I would appreciate any advice people can give. From: "C" To: "James Kelly" Subject: what is it? Date: 29 August 2004 20:00 Snipping all .... for bandwidth ( another nettiquette thing) Microsoft Outlook does not have always have a default spell checker. You have to set it to spell check. A novice may not know this either and obviously the less than novice suggesting it not correctly informed. I use outlook and my ( so called default) checker, rarely kicks in properly despite having it checked to kick in. So there are more things in Heaven and Earth Horatio..... and not spelling correctly isnt going to stop the sun coming up or going down is it? Indeed how stupid of you not to first read the group before contributing even, as you will have seen, and hopefully learnt some groups welcome picture and are normally tagged "binary" others do not. I didn't block your picture my newsgroup server did because you broke the rules, you however seem not only to be a novice but an argumentative one and therefore I have now totally blocked you. You might learn how to use a spell checker as well it might make your emails and Usenet postings more accurate and readable. I see from your headers ""From: "James Kelly" To: "Cerumen" References: Subject: what is it? Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Status: U X-UIDL: 1093797262.11402.mail04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net, S=2857 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 version=2.64 X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 195.188.213.63 62.31.98.2"""" You use Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 that has a default spell check, try allowing it to do it's job. Goodbye ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Kelly" To: "Cerumen" Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 5:34 PM Subject: what is it? I'm sorry that you think blocking a picture of a plant is so great. Being a novice to computing I was unaware of the restrictions on getting information from what appeared to be a group on gardening, which afterall is a mainly visual experience. How stupid of me. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cerumen" Newsgroups: uk.rec.gardening Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 8:06 PM Subject: what is it? "Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... "jakell" wrote in message . uk... Can anyone tell me what this is.........Jakell Don't post graphics attachments to this ng, as this is a text-only newsgroup and many of the servers will strip the attachment from your post. My server seems to have blocked the entire original post thankfully. -- Chris Thomas West Cork Ireland "Cerumen" wrote in message ... "Kay" wrote in message ... In article , GOOD GOLLY MISS mOLLY writes "jakell" wrote in message .uk... Can anyone tell me what this is.........Jakell Yes it is a picture posted to a non binary newsgroup. Which a lot of us can't even see since our ISP removes them, so it's a bit self -defeating. I even got a rather snotty email from the original sender of the binary tonight complaining about my earlier post in this thread. Says they are a novice Usenet poster which seems obvious, also now an ignored novice. Novices should learn by their mistakes not criticise those who point them out? -- Chris Thomas West Cork Ireland |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
And tops posting ....... opps , didnt clear the bandwidth. Rev. Mother I
have sinned. I made a mistake. "mich" wrote in message ... |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
In article , mich
writes "Kay" wrote in message ... In article , lynd writes I doubt whether the OP cares a damn whether *I* can see it. The point I was making was that several ISPs trim off binaries so that the OP was posting in a way that made sure that a good number of those from whom he was seeking advice were not in a position to be able to give that advice. But I think the point here is not so mcu what people have said as the way they chose to say it? And again Kay, your choice of comment here reflects the approach. Its crass and rude and is off putting to all posters. Although it could be a reflection of modern times. It is not a reflection of modern times. It is a reflection of words like 'snotty' in the post I was replying to. My original response was perfectly polite, and helpful in that I gave a good reason why it made sense not to post binaries here. My second post was a trifle short tempered, but was in response to one which was insulting, and to an attitude of 'I've got a fast download and an ISP which passes on binaries, so it doesn't matter about the conventions of usenet or the problems of those still using slow dial up connections'. I'm damned if I see the need to remain unfailingly polite in the face of rudeness from others. You have an interesting sig - pitty its not heeded by yourself here. If you are addressing me, I think you have completely lost track of who posted what. -- Kay "Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river" |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
I'm damned if I see the need to remain unfailingly polite in the face of rudeness from others. So if somebody swore at you, you would lower yourself to their level and swear back? I know of a past 'Manager' who did that. One should lead by example, bring them up to your standard. Mike |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Kay" wrote in message ... In article , mich writes You have an interesting sig - pitty its not heeded by yourself here. If you are addressing me, I think you have completely lost track of who posted what. Kay "Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river" No I didnt loose sight of who posted what. Your sig is above isnt it Kay? As I said, a pitty you dont heed it. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike" wrote in message ... I'm damned if I see the need to remain unfailingly polite in the face of rudeness from others. So if somebody swore at you, you would lower yourself to their level and swear back? I know of a past 'Manager' who did that. One should lead by example, bring them up to your standard. I agree with this whole heartedly. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"lynd" wrote in message ... [snip] Well, I guess if people give snotty and ill thought replies , which I guess were meant to be *whitty*, The word you want is "witty". Surely a simple, sorry this group doesnt take binary pictures and *I* cant see it would be better. Some of us on the other hand do not have machinery which is floorewd What is "floorewd"? by binary and do not have net nanny ISP's who remove them for us! Well, you can't expect to have everything. I could see the picture. I reckon a lot could and are afraid to say because of the silly and in some cases downright nasty replies saying so is likely to cause Please learn that poisoned binary files are a favourite way of propagating viruses. Most newsgroups, other than the *.bin ones are supposed to be text-only files. Franz |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"mich" wrote in message ... You wrote too much. Do you really believe that anybody will pay any attention to your mouthings other than in the tone I am displaying here? Franz |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
On 30/8/04 2:34 pm, in article , "Mike"
wrote: I'm damned if I see the need to remain unfailingly polite in the face of rudeness from others. So if somebody swore at you, you would lower yourself to their level and swear back? I know of a past 'Manager' who did that. One should lead by example, bring them up to your standard. Mike Which will mean that you'll stop trying to stir things up then Mike? -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove the weeds to email me) |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
In article , mich
writes "Mike" wrote in message ... I'm damned if I see the need to remain unfailingly polite in the face of rudeness from others. So if somebody swore at you, you would lower yourself to their level and swear back? No. Just as in this thread I didn't hurl back insults such as had been thrown at me. -- Kay "Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river" |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
In article , mich
writes "Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river" No I didnt loose sight of who posted what. Your sig is above isnt it Kay? That was not the quotation you appeared to be commenting on. If it was that sig that you meant, the context of your comment suggests you understand it in a different way from me. -- Kay "Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river" |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
So if somebody swore at you, you would lower yourself to their level and swear back? I know of a past 'Manager' who did that. One should lead by example, bring them up to your standard. Mike Which will mean that you'll stop trying to stir things up then Mike? -- I take it you agree that people should be able to swear and use bad language at you and not bring it to their attention, that it is the language of the gutter? "I think not" Have you seen me swear? No. So why should I accept people swearing at me? Language of the gutter and proof that they do not comprehend the English Language. Channel 2 @ 9.00pm. I have read the write up on pages 66 and 68 of the Radio Times. By the looks of things, not the sort of children to be proud of, and as a female, I guess you are not toooo pleased at their being a member of your sex. And in case any newbie thinks I am a 'goodie goodie' doesn't swear, drink, smoke or gamble you are wrong. I have served in the Royal Navy, and worked in Shipyards and on Building Sites. There is a place for everything, and swearing in public is a no no and I regard these newsgroups as VERY public. You will now pull that to pieces Sacha, but that is your way with those 'outside' the 'inner circle' of uk.rec.gardening. Mike Who doesn't knowingly tell lies |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|