On 16 May 2004 18:52:13 GMT, Damned Liberal opined:

btw, where is Bin Laden?

(...)

He's probably living large in the east Village just now.

On Sun, 16 May 2004 21:08:09 UTC, escapee
opined:
On 16 May 2004 17:58:27 GMT, "Stan Goodman" opined:


I subscribed to this group only a few hours ago. Does this kind of thing
happen frequently here?

No, it rarely happens, however I do see you continued by crossposting it again.
Please do not crosspost if you don't want to see that type of shit here.

You are quite right. Sorry.

--
Stan Goodman
Qiryat Tiv'on
Israel

To send me email, please replace the CAPITAL_LETTERS with "sig". Please do
not send me HTML-formatted messages.Please do not send me attachments
without telling me beforehand.

Bob Brock wrote in
news
On Sun, 16 May 2004 15:51:46 GMT, Strider wrote:


WWIII started on 9/11/01, you pinhead. Bush is the only candidate
willing to win this war.

A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden.

"rec.gardens?" Damn, when you guys spam, it doesn't matter where it
goes does it?


G'day Bob !

Hey , when it comes to spamming , you just got to do it propperly !
hows it going anyway ?

Damned Liberal wrote in message news.com...
(Jeffrey C. Dege) wrote in
:

On 16 May 2004 17:51:18 GMT, Damned Liberal
wrote:
(Jeffrey C. Dege) wrote in
:

On 16 May 2004 17:33:40 GMT, Damned Liberal
wrote:

Where are the WMDs?

Being trucked into Jordan from Syria in multi-ton lots, by al Qaeda
operatives.

Haven't you been paying any attention at all?

I guess American's knowledge of geography really is that bad.

Are you saying that the geography of the area prevents material from
being trucked from Iraq to Syria or from Syria to Jordan?

You would think that wouldn't you. The question remains, where are they
and why if your claims are true, why are they still moving around? And
if they are so easily moved around, how much sense did it make to invade
Iraq when we can't stop the traffic? Are we going to keep invading
countries until we get it right? At best what it amounts to is
ineptitude and at worst, subterfuge.

btw, where is Bin Laden?

Saddam never had nukes, he only wanted them. At one time Saddam had
bio and chemical weapons, but that was stopped by the first war and
subsequent inspections. He had only low grade weapons anyway, so they
turned to mush in a few short hours to years depending on the weapon.

He had no WMD and the US knew it damn well.

Where is Bin Laden? Working as Bush's excuse to keep everyone worried
about terrorism. There will probably be another attack right before
the election that Bush hopes will be cause for the public to "rally
behind" him. Bush is badly mistaken. Public opinion has turned a
corner. Anything bad that happens at this point is Bush's fault.
People are out of patience for his lies, criminal acts, and failures.






Why else would we invade the wrong country?
oh yeah, oil.

If Iraq hadn't had oil, Saddam wouldn't have had been the threat that
he was. So oil certainly has some bearing on the issue.

But if you're trying to pretend that we're going to make a profit off
of this by selling off Iraqi oil - it's a farcical claim.

Of course the American people aren't going to benefit from control of
Iraq's oil, but it doesn't mean Bush's oil buddies aren't going to turn a
tidy profit from contracts. You can call it farcical all you want.
There certainly don't appear to be any plans to invade Jordan or Syria,
where you claim to be WMDs in multi-ton lots. Where is the "willing to
win"? Too busy in Iraq murdering people who actually are defending their
country?

That must be some sort of retarded inside joke that makes sense only to you
or else the lobotomy you got as a teenager has done permanent damage to the
cognitive portions of your peanut brain.

When are you and your fascist butt buddies going to get together and goose
step on Washington in support of Dubaya's plans for nuclear annihilation for
crude oil?


"Offbreed" wrote in message
om...
"Cereus-validus" wrote in message
...
Go research yourself, you delusional Bunker-brained inbred Republi-Nazi.
Too
bad your keepers took away all your crayons.

Your post makes no sense at all, unless you are another Alan Connor sock
puppet.

Xref: kermit misc.survivalism:575215 rec.gardens:278951

Didn't somebody say they saw the WMDs being auctioned off on EBay as accent
pieces for the garden?

Every good republi-Nazi Dubaya Bush supporter should have one they can call
their own!!!


"ChiaPets" wrote in message
om...
Damned Liberal wrote in message
news.com...
(Jeffrey C. Dege) wrote in
:

On 16 May 2004 17:51:18 GMT, Damned Liberal
wrote:
(Jeffrey C. Dege) wrote in
:

On 16 May 2004 17:33:40 GMT, Damned Liberal
wrote:

Where are the WMDs?

Being trucked into Jordan from Syria in multi-ton lots, by al Qaeda
operatives.

Haven't you been paying any attention at all?

I guess American's knowledge of geography really is that bad.

Are you saying that the geography of the area prevents material from
being trucked from Iraq to Syria or from Syria to Jordan?

You would think that wouldn't you. The question remains, where are they
and why if your claims are true, why are they still moving around? And
if they are so easily moved around, how much sense did it make to invade
Iraq when we can't stop the traffic? Are we going to keep invading
countries until we get it right? At best what it amounts to is
ineptitude and at worst, subterfuge.

btw, where is Bin Laden?

Saddam never had nukes, he only wanted them. At one time Saddam had
bio and chemical weapons, but that was stopped by the first war and
subsequent inspections. He had only low grade weapons anyway, so they
turned to mush in a few short hours to years depending on the weapon.

He had no WMD and the US knew it damn well.

Where is Bin Laden? Working as Bush's excuse to keep everyone worried
about terrorism. There will probably be another attack right before
the election that Bush hopes will be cause for the public to "rally
behind" him. Bush is badly mistaken. Public opinion has turned a
corner. Anything bad that happens at this point is Bush's fault.
People are out of patience for his lies, criminal acts, and failures.






Why else would we invade the wrong country?
oh yeah, oil.

If Iraq hadn't had oil, Saddam wouldn't have had been the threat that
he was. So oil certainly has some bearing on the issue.

But if you're trying to pretend that we're going to make a profit off
of this by selling off Iraqi oil - it's a farcical claim.

Of course the American people aren't going to benefit from control of
Iraq's oil, but it doesn't mean Bush's oil buddies aren't going to turn
a
tidy profit from contracts. You can call it farcical all you want.
There certainly don't appear to be any plans to invade Jordan or Syria,
where you claim to be WMDs in multi-ton lots. Where is the "willing to
win"? Too busy in Iraq murdering people who actually are defending
their
country?

"Cereus-validus" wrote in
om:

That must be some sort of retarded inside joke that makes sense only
to you or else the lobotomy you got as a teenager has done permanent
damage to the cognitive portions of your peanut brain.

alan couldnt string so many big words together .



When are you and your fascist butt buddies going to get together and
goose step on Washington in support of Dubaya's plans for nuclear
annihilation for crude oil?


"Offbreed" wrote in message
om...
"Cereus-validus" wrote in message
...
Go research yourself, you delusional Bunker-brained inbred
Republi-Nazi.
Too
bad your keepers took away all your crayons.

Your post makes no sense at all, unless you are another Alan Connor
sock
puppet.

Inbreed might be forced to look up those "big words" in his Funk &
Wagnall's, if only he could read!!!

He probably thinks a dictionary is one of those mercenary porn magazines he
looks at while flogging himself!!! Check out that spread of bunker babes for
2004!!! Bet he's like to get one of them in "hand to hand" combat!!!


"Myal" wrote in message
...
"Cereus-validus" wrote in
om:

That must be some sort of retarded inside joke that makes sense only
to you or else the lobotomy you got as a teenager has done permanent
damage to the cognitive portions of your peanut brain.

alan couldnt string so many big words together .



When are you and your fascist butt buddies going to get together and
goose step on Washington in support of Dubaya's plans for nuclear
annihilation for crude oil?


"Offbreed" wrote in message
om...
"Cereus-validus" wrote in message
...
Go research yourself, you delusional Bunker-brained inbred
Republi-Nazi.
Too
bad your keepers took away all your crayons.

Your post makes no sense at all, unless you are another Alan Connor
sock
puppet.

Watch out Gunnut.

WWVI could be when your mother finds out you've been on her computer posting
this silliness again instead of doing your homework!!!! Just wait until your
father get home! You just might end up seeing stars and stripes forever!!!!

In which stage of his Alzheimer's did Reagan win any wars? At least the two
of you share the same memories, eh?


"Gunner" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 16 May 2004 15:51:46 GMT, Strider wrote:


Would much rather vote for Kerry than have WWIII.

WWIII started on 9/11/01, you pinhead. Bush is the only candidate
willing to win this war.

A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden.

Strider

Actually..WW3 was the Cold War, won by Reagan.

Though I agree..WW4 started on 9/11..actually before..but it was
formalized then.

Gunner

That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's
cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays
there.
- George Orwell

On Mon, 17 May 2004 09:01:47 GMT, "Cereus-validus"
wrote:

Watch out Gunnut.

WWVI could be when your mother finds out you've been on her computer posting
this silliness again instead of doing your homework!!!! Just wait until your
father get home! You just might end up seeing stars and stripes forever!!!!

Chuckle...when unable to respond with any wit..your ilk has to resort
to juvenile mode. I should mention my Mom passed three years ago, when
I was 47.

In which stage of his Alzheimer's did Reagan win any wars? At least the two
of you share the same memories, eh?

http://www.coldwar.org/articles/90s/...iet_union.php3
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...t/1995/BMH.htm

One wonders if your testicles have descended yet, given the level of
your postings.

But no matter. School will be out shortly and hopefuly you will have
better ways to occupy your time than posting to the internet from your
parents basement.

Shrug

Gunner



That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's
cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays
there.
- George Orwell

On Sun, 16 May 2004 14:59:44 GMT, "Cereus-validus"
wrote:
Go research yourself, you delusional Bunker-brained inbred Republi-Nazi. Too
bad your keepers took away all your crayons.

Nix on Nader. A vote for that spoiler is as bad as a vote for Bush. He
should do everybod a favor and drive off a cliff in a Ford Pinto.

Wouldn't vote for that bumbling Dubaya Bush even if both his daughters gave
me a Lewinsky. That's what the two bimbos are famous for in Georgetown! You
too?

Would much rather vote for Kerry than have WWIII.
We're already in WWIII, or haven't you been paying attention?

Swyck

Don't laugh, it's not too far from the reality. We rented the Orwell film, 1984
last week. It's amazingly like what's trying to be forced on us by our current
administration. It seems the orgasm is evil and mind control is the weapon.
With a president who lives according to what God tells him to do, we are not far
from the films' premise.


On Mon, 17 May 2004 01:45:55 GMT, "Cereus-validus"
opined:

Didn't somebody say they saw the WMDs being auctioned off on EBay as accent
pieces for the garden?

Every good republi-Nazi Dubaya Bush supporter should have one they can call
their own!!!


"ChiaPets" wrote in message
. com...
Damned Liberal wrote in message
anews.com...
(Jeffrey C. Dege) wrote in
:

On 16 May 2004 17:51:18 GMT, Damned Liberal
wrote:
(Jeffrey C. Dege) wrote in
:

On 16 May 2004 17:33:40 GMT, Damned Liberal
wrote:

Where are the WMDs?

Being trucked into Jordan from Syria in multi-ton lots, by al Qaeda
operatives.

Haven't you been paying any attention at all?

I guess American's knowledge of geography really is that bad.

Are you saying that the geography of the area prevents material from
being trucked from Iraq to Syria or from Syria to Jordan?

You would think that wouldn't you. The question remains, where are they
and why if your claims are true, why are they still moving around? And
if they are so easily moved around, how much sense did it make to invade
Iraq when we can't stop the traffic? Are we going to keep invading
countries until we get it right? At best what it amounts to is
ineptitude and at worst, subterfuge.

btw, where is Bin Laden?

Saddam never had nukes, he only wanted them. At one time Saddam had
bio and chemical weapons, but that was stopped by the first war and
subsequent inspections. He had only low grade weapons anyway, so they
turned to mush in a few short hours to years depending on the weapon.

He had no WMD and the US knew it damn well.

Where is Bin Laden? Working as Bush's excuse to keep everyone worried
about terrorism. There will probably be another attack right before
the election that Bush hopes will be cause for the public to "rally
behind" him. Bush is badly mistaken. Public opinion has turned a
corner. Anything bad that happens at this point is Bush's fault.
People are out of patience for his lies, criminal acts, and failures.






Why else would we invade the wrong country?
oh yeah, oil.

If Iraq hadn't had oil, Saddam wouldn't have had been the threat that
he was. So oil certainly has some bearing on the issue.

But if you're trying to pretend that we're going to make a profit off
of this by selling off Iraqi oil - it's a farcical claim.

Of course the American people aren't going to benefit from control of
Iraq's oil, but it doesn't mean Bush's oil buddies aren't going to turn
a
tidy profit from contracts. You can call it farcical all you want.
There certainly don't appear to be any plans to invade Jordan or Syria,
where you claim to be WMDs in multi-ton lots. Where is the "willing to
win"? Too busy in Iraq murdering people who actually are defending
their
country?

On Mon, 17 May 2004 05:17:06 GMT, Gunner opined:

Actually..WW3 was the Cold War, won by Reagan.

Though I agree..WW4 started on 9/11..actually before..but it was
formalized then.

Gunner

That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's
cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays
there.
- George Orwell

Yes, but his "war on drugs" is still going strong. Ya.

On Mon, 17 May 2004 09:04:31 -0400, opined:


We're already in WWIII, or haven't you been paying attention?

Swyck

No, WE aren't in WW3. We, America, are in it all by our widdol sewewvs. When
we turn Iraq over to itself and they ask us to get out, will we? That will be
funny to watch as the current administration squirms while gas is 5 dollars a
gallon.

Two votes for the price of one sounds like a heck-of-a-deal to me. Thanks!

Best regards,
Bob