Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:54:52 -0400, Ann opined:
"Vox Humana" expounded: I think it is unlike that Kerry will run the government based on some religious superstition. No, he'll run it like the elitist snob he is. We have no good choice this November. At all. How is he an elitist slob? Do you have any reference or citation or example of what you mean? Need a good, cheap, knowledge expanding present for yourself or a friend? http://www.animaux.net/stern/present.html |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:47:57 GMT, (The Watcher) opined:
No, Kerry seems more likely to run the government based on some unrealistic idea of a Nanny State, with big dreams involving the government doing everything for everybody. Of course, somebody is going to have to pay for that, and I don't see Kerry raiding his wife's trust funds, so he'll have to get the money from the liberal's favorite source, the taxpayers. No problem. American taxpayers have deep pockets. :/ How is that any worse than the pandering to corporate America by our current administration? Need a good, cheap, knowledge expanding present for yourself or a friend? http://www.animaux.net/stern/present.html |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:55:46 GMT, (The Watcher) opined:
OK, now all you have to do is prove that Bush's comment is the CAUSE of that. Good luck. Maybe Michael Moore would be willing to help you try. I wouldn't count on him actually being much help, since he's not much in the credibility department, but he'd be willing to try, I'm sure. Oh, so the facts he exposed are not enough? I don't only have Michael Moore. There's Greg Palast, Paul Krugman, Al Franken, Joe Conason, Molly Ivans, Jim Hightower, or any number of books at the link I provide at the end of my message. All of them can't be wrong. The facts are the facts. Sometimes 18 is kids. Sometimes it isn't. I work with a 29-year-old who acts like he's going on 13, so chronological age isn't a guarantee of maturity. (snip) No dear. Eighteen is always a kid. It's always someone who is only eighteen. I was not talking about maturity. However, since you did mention maturity is it possible you are one of those who are going on 13? Need a good, cheap, knowledge expanding present for yourself or a friend? http://www.animaux.net/stern/present.html |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:43:02 GMT, (The Watcher) opined:
Yep, good emotional label to use for people old enough to vote for president, drink alcohol, kill for their country, die for their country, get married, have children, and do everything else anyone who's reached the age of majority can do. I prefer to avoid emotional arguments like that, especially when discussing logical questions. No, we need more emotional things like terror levels with color charts. We need more of that. We need more of a government who controls people through Patriot Act 2, and who can fly their friends out of the country, while organ donations were not permitted to fly to their destination, causing many deaths. It's a very deep thing. It's not this flippant thing you want to make it seem to be. It is not emotional, it's factual. Speaking of facts, we pay less tax than most countries in the world. I would think everyone would be willing to pay the tax so elders could have medicine and children could have health care. So women could have prenatal care. I guess caring for people is disgusting. Oh well. Need a good, cheap, knowledge expanding present for yourself or a friend? http://www.animaux.net/stern/present.html |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
not to mention the lasting emotional damage to all of them. so many of our ex
soldiers end up incapacitated and on the streets and homeless. Ingrid Oh my........i really tried to not respond.......but.......a logical argument that i would make is that the lives of the men and women lost in the current Iraq war are a great loss to the nation, their families, their communities, and the value of our heritage. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List http://puregold.aquaria.net/ www.drsolo.com Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the endorsements or recommendations I make. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
we werent fooled the first time. the election was stolen and delivered to him by his
brother and the supremes. Ingrid "Den" wrote in message ... (We won't get fooled again ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List http://puregold.aquaria.net/ www.drsolo.com Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the endorsements or recommendations I make. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
LOL... I just love the very shopworn charge that democrats are tax and spend but
republicans are what? Clinton is in for 8 years. He pays off the credit card charges (trillion dollar debt) run up by the previous 12 years of republicans. He leaves a surplus. In comes another republican and within 2 YEARS the credit cards are maxed out. republicans know how to run up the charge cards and line the pockets of already wealthy people. they dont think it is necessary to pay their bills. democrats are responsible enough to pay for their programs aimed at helping everyone, but especially helping those that need the MOST help. when Kerry wins he is going to have to pay off the credit card charges of this Bush. Ingrid (The Watcher) wrote: No, Kerry seems more likely to run the government based on some unrealistic idea of a Nanny State, with big dreams involving the government doing everything for everybody. Of course, somebody is going to have to pay for that, and I don't see Kerry raiding his wife's trust funds, so he'll have to get the money from the liberal's favorite source, the taxpayers. No problem. American taxpayers have deep pockets. :/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List http://puregold.aquaria.net/ www.drsolo.com Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the endorsements or recommendations I make. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
well.... according to the republican TV ads anyway. you dont really believe those,
right? (otherwise I gotta bridge to sell). INgrid (The Watcher) wrote: Yes, Kerry has said MANY things(as well as the opposite of those many things). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List http://puregold.aquaria.net/ www.drsolo.com Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the endorsements or recommendations I make. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
In article , (The
Watcher) wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:45:37 -0700, Tom Jaszewski wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:13:12 GMT, (The Watcher) wrote: calling them kids seems a bit disingenious. Kids pure and simple! they're kids! And that includes the senior NCO's in their late 30's? 42% of our armed forces are between the ages 18 and 25. The youngest will be the ones in areas of greatest danger hence the jumbo category of casualties. So yeah, the average age at death may today be a LITTLE older than for the children sent to Viet Nam, an era when they dying two years sooner than they could vote. But make no mistake, even today kids remain the ones at greatest risk of falling in battle. The day when the psychotic shitheads who plan the wars have to actually lead the battles they think so essential, that's the same day ourleaders begin singing Give Peace a Chance. -paghat the ratgirl -- "Of what are you afraid, my child?" inquired the kindly teacher. "Oh, sir! The flowers, they are wild," replied the timid creature. -from Peter Newell's "Wild Flowers" Visit the Garden of Paghat the Ratgirl: http://www.paghat.com |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
In article ,
says... Nope, I don't see it a a choice between Kerry and Bush. I see it as a choice between ALL the candidates on the ballot. I prefer neither of those choices. In a close election, which this promises to be, that's called throwing away your vote. BTW, I'm wondering if Bush is going to engineer a "crisis" in October to ensure his re-election. Or "postpone" the election. I think it was Will Rogers who said "The Republicans want to take my money and give it to the rich. The Democrats want to take my money and give it to the poor. I'd like to keep it myself, but if those are the choices I'd just as soon it went to the poor." -- Where ARE those Iraqi WMDs? |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:58:13 -0700, Larry Blanchard wrote:
In article , says... Nope, I don't see it a a choice between Kerry and Bush. I see it as a choice between ALL the candidates on the ballot. I prefer neither of those choices. In a close election, which this promises to be, that's called throwing away your vote. It can also be called sending a message to the 2 parties. I've been calling it "throwing my vote away" for years, but I'm beginning to think it's time for more people to send the 2 big parties a message. If enough people send them a message, maybe they'll get a clue. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:04:33 GMT, escapee wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:47:57 GMT, (The Watcher) opined: No, Kerry seems more likely to run the government based on some unrealistic idea of a Nanny State, with big dreams involving the government doing everything for everybody. Of course, somebody is going to have to pay for that, and I don't see Kerry raiding his wife's trust funds, so he'll have to get the money from the liberal's favorite source, the taxpayers. No problem. American taxpayers have deep pockets. :/ How is that any worse than the pandering to corporate America by our current administration? And how is it better? |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Bush intel?
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bradley method bush regeneration | Australia | |||
Planting new rosemary bush/shrub | Gardening | |||
Chilean Fire Tree/Bush Embothrium coccineum | Gardening | |||
Bush plan eases forest rules | alt.forestry |