The message
from John

Displayed stupidity and cowardice by fraudulently signing guttersnipe
abuse with the name of another poster.

Janet

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:35:29 GMT, Janet Baraclough
wrote:

The message
from John

Displayed stupidity and cowardice by fraudulently signing guttersnipe
abuse with the name of another poster.

Janet

Troll whore who cares?
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.

In article I0J3K62F37981.7185648148@anonymous, Malcolm Kane
writes
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:35:29 GMT, Janet Baraclough
wrote:

The message
from John

Displayed stupidity and cowardice by fraudulently signing guttersnipe
abuse with the name of another poster.

Janet

Troll whore who cares?

I do for one.



--
Kay Easton

Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm

In article , Franz Heymann
writes

"Steve Harris" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Franz Heymann) wrote:

The most probabe reason is the lack of interesting gardening
activities in midwinter.

A common misapprehension amongst beginners, Franz :-)

Not at all. Folk without a greenhouse have indeed very little to do in
winter.

Even folk with a greenhouse have little to do! My cacti don't want any
water from now till April or May, and even the rest only want a little
water once a week if that. All I need to do is wander in now and again,
remove a few dead leaves, and marvel at this oasis of flowers in the
depths of winter ;-)

Whereas in the rest of the garden I have wisterias and apples to be
pruned


--
Kay Easton

Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm

On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:44:15 +0000, Kay Easton
wrote:

In article I0J3K62F37981.7185648148@anonymous, Malcolm Kane
writes
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:35:29 GMT, Janet Baraclough
wrote:

The message
from John

Displayed stupidity and cowardice by fraudulently signing
guttersnipe
abuse with the name of another poster.

Janet

Troll whore who cares?

I do for one.


Troll whore who cares?

Malcolm Ogilvie.

In article u.org,
Malcolm Ogilvie writes
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:44:15 +0000, Kay Easton
wrote:

In article I0J3K62F37981.7185648148@anonymous, Malcolm Kane
writes
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:35:29 GMT, Janet Baraclough
wrote:

The message
from John

Displayed stupidity and cowardice by fraudulently signing
guttersnipe
abuse with the name of another poster.

Janet

Troll whore who cares?

I do for one.


Troll whore who cares?

Malcolm Ogilvie.

The above message, purporting to come from me, did not, as should be
apparent from the false e-mail address of ".
And the previous one, purporting to come from Malcolm Kane, was yet
another puerile attempt to deceive by the same person.

--
Malcolm Ogilvie

On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 18:08:35 +0000, Malcolm Ogilvie
wrote:


In article u.org,
Malcolm Ogilvie writes
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:44:15 +0000, Kay Easton
wrote:

In article I0J3K62F37981.7185648148@anonymous, Malcolm Kane
writes
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:35:29 GMT, Janet Baraclough
wrote:

The message
from John

Displayed stupidity and cowardice by fraudulently signing
guttersnipe
abuse with the name of another poster.

Janet

Troll whore who cares?

I do for one.


Troll whore who cares?

Malcolm Ogilvie.

The above message, purporting to come from me, did not, as should be
apparent from the false e-mail address of ".
And the previous one, purporting to come from Malcolm Kane, was yet
another puerile attempt to deceive by the same person.

I think we are quite capable or working things out ourselves without
you constantly advising us. Aside from that, you have been known to
use various remailers for trolling, especially when you get abusive
and violent. How do we know it really wasn't you? and how do you know
the previous post was from the same person, unless of course it was
you. In which case why do you do it?















**********************************************




'You can't win 'em all.'
Lord Haw Haw.

Since I stopped donating money to CONservation hooligan charities
Like the RSPB, Woodland Trust and all the other fat cat charities
I am in the top 0.801% richest people in the world.
There are 5,951,930,035 people poorer than me

If you're really interested I am the 48,069,965
richest person in the world.

And I'm keeping the bloody lot.

So sue me.

http://www.globalrichlist.com/

Newsgroup ettiquette

1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining
they're having no effect.
5) Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know
how to avoid them.
6) Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
7) Eat vast quantities of pies.
8) Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
9) Help a demon.local poster with their email while
secretly reading it.
10) Pretend you're a hard ******* when in fact you're
as bent as a roundabout.
11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
12) Die of old age
13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
will have a penis the girls can see.

---------------------------------------

"If you would'nt talk to them in a bar, don't *uckin' vote for them"

"Australia was not *discovered* it was invaded"
The Big Yin.

On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 18:08:35 +0000, Malcolm Ogilvie
wrote:


In article u.org,
Malcolm Ogilvie writes
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:44:15 +0000, Kay Easton
wrote:

In article I0J3K62F37981.7185648148@anonymous, Malcolm Kane
writes
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:35:29 GMT, Janet Baraclough
wrote:

The message
from John

Displayed stupidity and cowardice by fraudulently signing
guttersnipe
abuse with the name of another poster.

Janet

Troll whore who cares?

I do for one.


Troll whore who cares?

Malcolm Ogilvie.

The above message, purporting to come from me, did not, as should be
apparent from the false e-mail address of ".
And the previous one, purporting to come from Malcolm Kane, was yet
another puerile attempt to deceive by the same person.

I think we are quite capable or working things out ourselves without
you constantly advising us. Aside from that, you have been known to
use various remailers for trolling, especially when you get abusive
and violent. How do we know it really wasn't you? and how do you know
the previous post was from the same person, unless of course it was
you. In which case why do you do it?















**********************************************




'You can't win 'em all.'
Lord Haw Haw.

Since I stopped donating money to CONservation hooligan charities
Like the RSPB, Woodland Trust and all the other fat cat charities
I am in the top 0.801% richest people in the world.
There are 5,951,930,035 people poorer than me

If you're really interested I am the 48,069,965
richest person in the world.

And I'm keeping the bloody lot.

So sue me.

http://www.globalrichlist.com/

Newsgroup ettiquette

1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining
they're having no effect.
5) Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know
how to avoid them.
6) Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
7) Eat vast quantities of pies.
8) Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
9) Help a demon.local poster with their email while
secretly reading it.
10) Pretend you're a hard ******* when in fact you're
as bent as a roundabout.
11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
12) Die of old age
13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
will have a penis the girls can see.

---------------------------------------

"If you would'nt talk to them in a bar, don't *uckin' vote for them"

"Australia was not *discovered* it was invaded"
The Big Yin.

In article , Anne Jackson
writes
The message
from Judith Lea contains these words:

However, like
some of us she gets fed up with the childish repartee of some posters
and as a long time urgler, she has a vested interest, as most of us do,
to try and keep broadly to gardening matters.

Like gold slippers and faux cigarettes? Hmmmm! I remember
long-ago conversations, Judith!!

Hello again Anne - as I mentioned in my posting we all like to have a
natter over the urg fence, including me, either on or off topic, its the
persistent nasty postings that I object to. However that is my last
comment on that, in this thread!

Back to the gold slippers - I have the most lovely pair in the garage at
the moment - caked in clay. Worse, I am seeing an eye consultant this
afternoon as my g.p. thinks I have a detached retina - I fell in the car
park at Stansted Airport into a dip - it was 4a.m. in the morning and
very dark.

As for the faux fag, I have not smoked now in 6 years and please God
that I don't again but I am not so smug as to be over confident. So, I
agree, the above comments are off topic - but hopefully not insulting to
anyone.

Happy and Healthy New Year
--
Judith Lea

The message
from Judith Lea contains these words:


Back to the gold slippers - I have the most lovely pair in the garage at
the moment - caked in clay. Worse, I am seeing an eye consultant this
afternoon as my g.p. thinks I have a detached retina - I fell in the car
park at Stansted Airport into a dip - it was 4a.m. in the morning and
very dark.

Sorry to hear about that Judith, best wishes and fingers crossed.

Janet.

The message
from Judith Lea contains these words:


Back to the gold slippers - I have the most lovely pair in the garage at
the moment - caked in clay. Worse, I am seeing an eye consultant this
afternoon as my g.p. thinks I have a detached retina - I fell in the car
park at Stansted Airport into a dip - it was 4a.m. in the morning and
very dark.

Sorry to hear about that Judith, best wishes and fingers crossed.

Janet.

Judith Lea8/1/04 10:37
snip

Back to the gold slippers - I have the most lovely pair in the garage at
the moment - caked in clay. Worse, I am seeing an eye consultant this
afternoon as my g.p. thinks I have a detached retina - I fell in the car
park at Stansted Airport into a dip - it was 4a.m. in the morning and
very dark.
snip

Honestly, Judith.......had you ever thought of getting *black* slippers just
in case there's some kind of curse involved here?!
Hope this is going to be something that is dealt with quickly and that you
get well soon.
--

Sacha
(remove the 'x' to email me)

Judith Lea8/1/04 10:37
snip

Back to the gold slippers - I have the most lovely pair in the garage at
the moment - caked in clay. Worse, I am seeing an eye consultant this
afternoon as my g.p. thinks I have a detached retina - I fell in the car
park at Stansted Airport into a dip - it was 4a.m. in the morning and
very dark.
snip

Honestly, Judith.......had you ever thought of getting *black* slippers just
in case there's some kind of curse involved here?!
Hope this is going to be something that is dealt with quickly and that you
get well soon.
--

Sacha
(remove the 'x' to email me)

In article , Judith Lea leaeeeeeee
writes


Back to the gold slippers - I have the most lovely pair in the garage at
the moment - caked in clay. Worse, I am seeing an eye consultant this
afternoon as my g.p. thinks I have a detached retina - I fell in the car
park at Stansted Airport into a dip - it was 4a.m. in the morning and
very dark.

Judith - do let us know how you get on. I emailed you (twice) but it
bounced (and, yes, I did remove the spamtrap)
--
Kay Easton

Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm

In article , Sacha
writes
Honestly, Judith.......had you ever thought of getting *black* slippers just
in case there's some kind of curse involved here?!
Hope this is going to be something that is dealt with quickly and that you
get well soon.

Thank you Janet and Sacha - off topic I know but I have a retinal
posterior detachment - I am seeing the Consultant again next Wednesday
and there is a possibility that I may have it lazered back into position
- however to be positive - I can still look at my seed catalogues so
it's not too bad!

--
Judith Lea