Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
Sue wrote: Farm1 wrote nothing that was either aggressive or abusive - unlike yourself. And you always seem to pop in for an argument. Where have I been abusive to Farm1? I recall her being very abusive to me in February to defend her mate, as she always does, and trying for another go. That's what I am seeing. Keep out of it Sue. You are invivted to Sacha's tea party - don't worry - so let me be. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
Janet Baraclough wrote: (rubbish as usual) I don't remember you replying to my post about Irvine Bay. You are always there to contradict people, even the job that they have, their feelings, experience - you just don't beleive them, feeling secured behind your screen, but when it comes to facing facts you are not too clever. I'll be in Irvine Bay on the 2nd November at the Big Idea. That's your district isn't it. Let's see if you have the guts to actually face the people who you tear apart on the net. Lets see once and for all if you can face me, face my colleagues, my husband, my work and lets bring proof about who I am, you who called me a troll within 2 posts. Then Janet, you can say what you want - you will have reasons to do. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
"La Puce" wrote in message
Sue wrote: Farm1 wrote nothing that was either aggressive or abusive - unlike yourself. And you always seem to pop in for an argument. Where have I been abusive to Farm1? I recall her being very abusive to me in February to defend her mate, Was it in February when you went stalking Janet? If it was in February, then I probably was abusive, but then I don't like stalkers. I'll be abusive to anyone who stalks ANYONE and especially if they deliberately come as an abusive and nasty stranger into a newsgroup where the person being stalked has been a long term, well known poster. Either way, whether I was abusive in another forum or not, it is irrelevant to this topic . It does not change the fact that you made erroneous statements here and are not prepared to take note that there are 3 other people who disagree with your erroneous statements. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
Farm1 wrote: You clearly don't want to admit it but you DID make erroneous statements. And you have been told this by 3 people. Yes, and who are these 3 people but the same ones who go on at me at every opportunity? Is it a crime to say the wrong word? I have said that I shouldn't have used the word 'based'. Why do you persist on going on and on about it? Even Uncle pointed out that I had put the wrong word. What do you want me to say? Both have an organic focus but Yes, and that was solely my point. I had also said this to you but you said you didn't see my post. But it seems that you now have. So perhaps you ought to apologise? Permaculture is not based on the work of Steiner and nor do Permaculturalists rely on the various Formula 500-508 and other techniques that the Biodynamics adherants do. No they don't indeed. I have however pointed out to other similarities. The work I did in the permaculture trust in Middlewood Lancaster run a Steiner school since the 60s. This I have seen and it is not the first time that I see Steiner being close to permaculture and biodynamics - because of the ecological similaries. I'm young and excited about all this - and when it comes up I get involved. In France we call biodynamics 'ecology' and we call permaculture 'ecology' because at the root of it all that's what it is and these was my first words in my first post on this thread. I thought that explaining to you in a manner that would enable you to check on what I say might help you to clear up your misunderstanding. Thank you for 'helping me clear up my understanding'. I don't feel that I don't understand. Quoting book's references when I am discussing actual experiences in permaculture trust, projects and events is not 'helping me' but rather is trying to undermind once again what I know and experience. But thanks again. I have also read you here. I've also read you when you very nastily chose to stalk Janet into another ng where she posted. Thank you. This is very much what I wanted you to come to it. You are having a go at me precisely because of this and not because of the subject at hand. I knew that you had ulterior motives. It was also pointed out to you on the other ng that if people resorts to having to 'stalk' another poster it's because they are angry. You can go back to your books now. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
Farm1 wrote: Was it in February when you went stalking Janet? If it was in February, then I probably was abusive, but then I don't like stalkers. Go away back to the farm ng, we don't need another abusive person here. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
In reply to Farm1 (please@askifyouwannaknow) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say : "La Puce" wrote in message Sue wrote: Farm1 wrote nothing that was either aggressive or abusive - unlike yourself. And you always seem to pop in for an argument. Where have I been abusive to Farm1? I recall her being very abusive to me in February to defend her mate, Was it in February when you went stalking Janet? If it was in February, then I probably was abusive, but then I don't like stalkers. I tried stalking La Puce, but I was a week out :-) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
Sacha wrote: I did not ask you to drag in my name to yet another of your harangues. As I know little about either subject I have nothing useful to contribute. However, I am sorry about this. I thought you had brought up the thread ... Still, I didn't wish to drag you in anything. A simple 'don't drag me' would however be sufficient. You don't need, yet again, drag the conflict even deeper. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
On 4/10/06 11:45, in article
, "La Puce" wrote: Sacha wrote: I did not ask you to drag in my name to yet another of your harangues. As I know little about either subject I have nothing useful to contribute. However, I am sorry about this. I thought you had brought up the thread ... Still, I didn't wish to drag you in anything. A simple 'don't drag me' would however be sufficient. You don't need, yet again, drag the conflict even deeper. I answered someone else's query with a pointer to a wine grower in Provence. I did NOT enter into the discussion about your information and nor did I raise the matter of an urg meet in this thread. If you use me or my name to pick fights with other people, you may be sure you will be treated in kind. -- Sacha www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
"Farm1" please@askifyouwannaknow wrote in message ... "La Puce" wrote in message Sue wrote: Farm1 wrote nothing that was either aggressive or abusive - unlike yourself. And you always seem to pop in for an argument. Where have I been abusive to Farm1? I recall her being very abusive to me in February to defend her mate, Was it in February when you went stalking Janet? If it was in February, then I probably was abusive, but then I don't like stalkers. I'll be abusive to anyone who stalks ANYONE and especially if they deliberately come as an abusive and nasty stranger into a newsgroup where the person being stalked has been a long term, well known poster. Either way, whether I was abusive in another forum or not, it is irrelevant to this topic . It does not change the fact that you made erroneous statements here and are not prepared to take note that there are 3 other people who disagree with your erroneous statements. You may assume 4 people, actually it is probably several dozen people but most folk don't really bother with Puce type stuff because it is invariably wrong. Newbies beware- Puce comes with a Health warning. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
Rupert (W.Yorkshire) wrote: You may assume 4 people, actually it is probably several dozen people but most folk don't really bother with Puce type stuff because it is invariably wrong. Newbies beware- Puce comes with a Health warning. That is so unfair, untrue and an horrible thing to say. Sacha didn't answer a query. We were talking about gardening by the moon, which I do, which I've described and discussed with others on another thread and it was pleasant and fun, but rather than joining in the conversation she started another thread on the same topic. I am indeed sorry to have brought her into this thread - but to say that all I say is wrong is really unfair. It is indeed strange that when I'm right, for example giving the thread about apple disease, I had got a few posts saying that it was rather strange because they're books didn't say so. As soon as Des agreed with me, nobody responded. And this has happened many time. We all have different ways of doing things and from the start some of you have given me grief because I perhaps don't describe as well as some of you, given that english is my second language. Though I have never left this bother me. I know what I mean ( ref. Uncle). I've responded accordingly - defended my position when needed - made some friends and infuriated others. But it's irrelevant now. I've had enough so good bye. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
uk.rec.gardening.moderated
"La Puce" wrote in message ups.com... I've had enough so good bye. I bet the net nannies and 'owners' are happy now :-(( Why don't you start a uk.rec.gardening.moderated so you can have "COMPLETE" control? Just think, no nasty people to say things YOU don't want to hear :-((( Mike |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
uk.rec.gardening.moderated
"Sacha" wrote in message
... On 4/10/06 11:45, in article , "La Puce" wrote: Sacha wrote: I did not ask you to drag in my name to yet another of your harangues. As I know little about either subject I have nothing useful to contribute. However, I am sorry about this. I thought you had brought up the thread ... Still, I didn't wish to drag you in anything. A simple 'don't drag me' would however be sufficient. You don't need, yet again, drag the conflict even deeper. I answered someone else's query with a pointer to a wine grower in Provence. I did NOT enter into the discussion about your information and nor did I raise the matter of an urg meet in this thread. If you use me or my name to pick fights with other people, you may be sure you will be treated in kind. -- Sacha South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ Certainly needed to keep the nasties out. uk.rec.gardening.moderated |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Biodynamics
The message .com
from "La Puce" contains these words: Path: master.news.zetnet.net!peer.news.zetnet.net!feeder .news-service.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.germany.com!p ostnews.google.com!m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com!no t-for-mail From: "La Puce" Newsgroups: uk.rec.gardening Subject: Biodynamics Date: 4 Oct 2006 02:49:15 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 18 Message-ID: .com References: om om .com .com NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.208.111.159 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1159955361 3309 127.0.0.1 (4 Oct 2006 09:49:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:49:21 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: Injection-Info: m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=213.208.111.159; posting-account=WuKRlAwAAAAbQjsIxxkK8CzTG1S42i2D Xref: master.news.zetnet.net uk.rec.gardening:358007 Janet Baraclough wrote: (rubbish as usual) I don't remember you replying to my post about Irvine Bay. You are always there to contradict people, even the job that they have, their feelings, experience - you just don't beleive them, feeling secured behind your screen, but when it comes to facing facts you are not too clever. I'll be in Irvine Bay on the 2nd November at the Big Idea. That's your district isn't it. Let's see if you have the guts to actually face the people who you tear apart on the net. Lets see once and for all if you can face me, face my colleagues, my husband, my work and lets bring proof about who I am, you who called me a troll within 2 posts. Then Janet, you can say what you want - you will have reasons to do. ? Janet |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Biodynamics: 2000 cherry tomatoes from a single plant! | Gardening |