wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson
wrote:

The message from Sacha contains these
words:

Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are
not
included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who
they
are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very*
much
having to say.

Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree'
or some other such pretentious nonsense!

Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big
Red Bus.

I wouldn't want to go anywhere near Puke!

wrote in message
ups.com...
On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson
wrote:
The message from Sacha contains these
words:

Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are
not
included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who
they
are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very*
much
having to say.

Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree'
or some other such pretentious nonsense!

Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big
Red Bus.

I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out
as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding
their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it
a rest.

Oh dear, I hope I haven't offended you, I replied to his post, I'll try to
be more careful in future!

Alan

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message , Anne Jackson
writes
The message from June Hughes contains
these words:

Sacha has insulted, verbally battered me and tried to get me thrown out
of another ng. My crime was in answering her back. I still don't know
whether or not I am one of the two omitted from the urg meet. I suspect
the others are Mike from the Isle of Wight, Puce and possible Jenny C,
who Sacha accused of condoning something Sacha had accused Puce of
(Sacha announced this when I welcomed Jenny to ukfd a few months ago).
If that is the case, then there are four, and not two. How come?

Is this something else I'm to be left out of? I object, most strongly!!

Still don't know whether or not she has excluded me.

Have you emailed her to say you are coming?

It is what she expects people who are going, to do.

Alan

"Anne Jackson" wrote in message
...
The message from "
contains these words:
On Mar 1, 11:49 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from Sacha contains these
words:

.for how long was your husband
'a Rodney' (as the sergeants refer to the officers), Judith?
Bill served for 36 years...

His name is Edward. Ranks always refer to Officers in that manner,
something to do with green eyes I belive?
Actually, they call them 'Ruperts'. Or perhaps that's a cavalry term
of
'endearment'.

It may well be...in the Scottish Regiments they were known as
'Rodneys'.

My Grandfather, was a Commander in the Navy, does that make him a
Rodney or a George (which was his name) g

....just as long as he wasn't a 'Roger'...! ;-))

Although he may have been 'Rogered'!



--
AnneJ

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message . com,
" writes
On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson
wrote:
The message from Sacha contains these
words:

Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are
not
included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who
they
are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret
*very* much
having to say.

Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a
soiree'
or some other such pretentious nonsense!

Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the Big
Red Bus.

I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out
as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding
their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it
a rest.

Not necessarily, Judith. Two people were specifically excluded from the
invitation. If you want to make someone feel uncomfortable, that is the
way to do it. She could just as well have invited people by email and
left it out of urg altogether. That way, those who were excluded didn't
have to know about it and those she wanted to attend would. Instead of
that, she broadcast it for all to see. Would you like it if it were you
who were excluded?

It wouldn't bother me, if someone had been so offensive to me as you seem to
think Sacha has been to some, I would have killfiled them so I would not be
aware of anything they have said.

I am getting VERY tired of all this backbiting.

Please, all of you, let it rest.


Alan

--
June Hughes

"June Hughes" wrote in message
...
In message .com,
" writes
On 28 Feb, 16:59, June Hughes wrote:
In message . com,
" writes



On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson
wrote:
The message from Sacha contains
these
words:

Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people
are not
included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they who
they
are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret
*very* much
having to say.

Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a
soiree'
or some other such pretentious nonsense!

Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the
Big Red Bus.

I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out
as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding
their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it
a rest.

Not necessarily, Judith. Two people were specifically excluded from the
invitation. If you want to make someone feel uncomfortable, that is the
way to do it. She could just as well have invited people by email and
left it out of urg altogether. That way, those who were excluded didn't
have to know about it and those she wanted to attend would. Instead of
that, she broadcast it for all to see. Would you like it if it were you
who were excluded?
--
June Hughes- Hide quoted text -

What do you mean by 'hide quoted text'? I had no quoted text.
Why on earth should she invite by email, it is an urg meet and if
certain people have offended her, then it is her right not to invite
them.

It is a meet of selected urg people, and therefore private. As already
said, this is Usenet.
I will be having an urg meet and again, there is a person that I
would not like to see in my home. I have been to meets where an
individual would not be welcome, this is life, we invite into our
sitting rooms members of a group and if one or two are excluded, then
too bad.

If I had insulted anyone the way Sacha has been insulted, then I would
be very surprised indeed if I were invited. This is my last word on
the subject as all genuine urglers are sick to the teeth of this.

Yes, I expect they are. I can't understand why you insist on carrying it
on.

So, why are you?


--
June Hughes

"Anne Jackson" wrote in message
...
The message from "
contains these words:

On 28 Feb, 16:24, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:20:54 GMT, Anne Jackson
wrote:
The message from Sacha contains
these
words:

Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people
are not
included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know
who they
are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret
*very* much
having to say.

Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a
soiree'
or some other such pretentious nonsense!

Contact Puce for bookings for the urg summer holiday in Aran in the
Big Red Bus.

I see our resident troll is back - for goodness sake what started out
as an invitation to a meet has turned into one or two people grinding
their own particular axes, we are all bored to death with it - give it
a rest.

YOU may be bored with it, I'm just getting into third gear....and if
certain
people are excluded then it ISN'T a meet, no matter what Sacha might call
it!

So, if the local Womens Institute adertise a 'meeting' then anyone could go,
even us lowly men?

Why the hell am I bothering to respond?

Alan

"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
On 28/2/07 18:09, in article
, "Dave Poole"
wrote:

On Feb 27, 11:20 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:

Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet.

Oh so a 'meet' has to include absolutely everyone? I live and learn.

Better call it 'a soiree'
or some other such pretentious nonsense!

Well you can call it what you like, the rest will continue to refer to
it as a 'meet' irrespective of exclusions.


Well.....we could have it in the dark, I suppose....... ;-))

The neighbours might wonder what is going on though!

Alan

"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
I'm still hoping to have an urg meet here on 7th July with the option of
going down to Charlie's nursery on the 8th - people could probably take in
the Eden Project that day, too but Charlie will give timings and
directions
for that!
People who want to make it a bit of a holiday could perhaps, go on from
Charlie's to Penzance and take the helicopter to Tresco the next day for a
day or overnight trip.



Please accept my apologies but I will be unable to attend.

Following a wonderful cruise in the Caribbean with a great group of people,
two shoreside functions have been arranged, the first a BBQ and Picnic in
the grounds of one of the cruiser group's home near Swindon on the very day
of the urg meet, the other, just to give you all advanced warning, the 1st
Annual Dinner Dance of the group with overnight accommodation in a very nice
hotel in Coventry. (I know this hotel very well and have used it many times
for Reunions). This will be taking place over the weekend of October 4th -
8th and already 45 have booked in!! We do know how to enjoy ourselves.

AND on this note, what are the thoughts of the 1st urgler's Annual Dinner
Dance on the same lines? Those interested please email me via my site in my
sig and PLEASE do NOT be put off by the tirade which Sacha will now put up
and do not be drawn in by her aggressive nature and respond to anything she
says. Thank you..

Mike


--
.................................................. ..............
The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association.
'THE' Association if you served in the Electrical Branch of the Royal Navy
www.rneba.org.uk

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:57:40 +0100, "'Mike'"
wrote:


"Sacha" wrote in message
.uk...
I'm still hoping to have an urg meet here on 7th July with the option of
going down to Charlie's nursery on the 8th - people could probably take in
the Eden Project that day, too but Charlie will give timings and
directions
for that!
People who want to make it a bit of a holiday could perhaps, go on from
Charlie's to Penzance and take the helicopter to Tresco the next day for a
day or overnight trip.



Please accept my apologies but I will be unable to attend.

Following a wonderful cruise in the Caribbean with a great group of people,
two shoreside functions have been arranged, the first a BBQ and Picnic in
the grounds of one of the cruiser group's home near Swindon on the very day
of the urg meet, the other, just to give you all advanced warning, the 1st
Annual Dinner Dance of the group with overnight accommodation in a very nice
hotel in Coventry. (I know this hotel very well and have used it many times
for Reunions). This will be taking place over the weekend of October 4th -
8th and already 45 have booked in!! We do know how to enjoy ourselves.

AND on this note, what are the thoughts of the 1st urgler's Annual Dinner
Dance on the same lines? Those interested please email me via my site in my
sig and PLEASE do NOT be put off by the tirade which Sacha will now put up
and do not be drawn in by her aggressive nature and respond to anything she
says. Thank you..

Mike

In the fantasy world you live in, you'll only ever be playing with
yourself anyway!



--


Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!


PRAYER FOR A NATION


When Pastor Joe Wright, of Central Christian Church, was asked
to open the new session of the Kansas Senate, everyone was expecting
the usual politically correct generalities.
But what they heard instead was this:

Heavenly Father, we come before You today to ask Your forgiveness
and seek your direction and guidance.
We know Your Word says,
‘Woe on those who call evil good,’ but that’s exactly what we have done.
We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and inverted our values.

We confess that:

We have ridiculed the absolute truth of Your Word and called it pluralism;

We have, worshipped other gods and called it multiculturalism;

We have endorsed perversion and called it an alternative lifestyle;

We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery;

We have neglected the needy and called it self-preservation;

We have killed our unborn and called it choice;

We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building self-esteem;

We have abused power and called it political savvy;

We have coveted our neighbour’s possessions and called it ambition;

We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression;

We have ridiculed the time-honoured values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment.

Search us, 0 God, and know our hearts today; try us and see if there be some wicked way in us;
cleanse us from every sin and set us free. Guide and bless these men and women who have
been sent here by the people of Kansas, and who have been ordained by You, to govern this great state.

Grant them Your wisdom to rule and may their decisions direct us to the centre of Your will. I ask it in the name of Your Son, the Living Saviour, Jesus Christ. Amen.”


****************


Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter by adding to your kill file..

"Pete (.¿.)" wrote in message
...

In the fantasy world you live in, you'll only ever be playing with
yourself anyway!



I live in a wonderful 'real' world with lots of wonderful 'real' people :-))

If you wish to fantasise, be my guest :-)

Mike

:-))



--
.................................................. ..............
The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association.
'THE' Association if you served in the Electrical Branch of the Royal Navy
www.rneba.org.uk

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:11:05 +0100, "'Mike'"
wrote:


"Pete (.¿.)" wrote in message
.. .

In the fantasy world you live in, you'll only ever be playing with
yourself anyway!



I live in a wonderful 'real' world with lots of wonderful 'real' people :-))

So you keep saying!
--


Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!


PRAYER FOR A NATION


When Pastor Joe Wright, of Central Christian Church, was asked
to open the new session of the Kansas Senate, everyone was expecting
the usual politically correct generalities.
But what they heard instead was this:

Heavenly Father, we come before You today to ask Your forgiveness
and seek your direction and guidance.
We know Your Word says,
‘Woe on those who call evil good,’ but that’s exactly what we have done.
We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and inverted our values.

We confess that:

We have ridiculed the absolute truth of Your Word and called it pluralism;

We have, worshipped other gods and called it multiculturalism;

We have endorsed perversion and called it an alternative lifestyle;

We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery;

We have neglected the needy and called it self-preservation;

We have killed our unborn and called it choice;

We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building self-esteem;

We have abused power and called it political savvy;

We have coveted our neighbour’s possessions and called it ambition;

We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression;

We have ridiculed the time-honoured values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment.

Search us, 0 God, and know our hearts today; try us and see if there be some wicked way in us;
cleanse us from every sin and set us free. Guide and bless these men and women who have
been sent here by the people of Kansas, and who have been ordained by You, to govern this great state.

Grant them Your wisdom to rule and may their decisions direct us to the centre of Your will. I ask it in the name of Your Son, the Living Saviour, Jesus Christ. Amen.”


****************


Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter by adding to your kill file..

"Pete (.¿.)" wrote in message
...

I live in a wonderful 'real' world with lots of wonderful 'real' people
:-))

So you keep saying!
--

Pete, YOU have the problem .......... live with it :-)

Kind regards

Mike


--
.................................................. ..............
The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association.
'THE' Association if you served in the Electrical Branch of the Royal Navy
www.rneba.org.uk