Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 1/3/07 14:50, in article , "BAC" wrote: "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 1/3/07 10:28, in article , "charles" wrote: snip I have never met Sacha, but in her place I would do just the same. The thing that absolutely amazes me, is that two women who so often make crystal clear their thorough dislike of me would even consider wanting to come to our home and make this ridiculous foot-stamping fuss about doing something they don't want to do with someone they don't like! If that's the case, then what's the point in going public on their banned status? I'm surprised at this. June & Anne are not the people I will not have here, though after this display both would need the hides of rhinos to imagine they would be actually welcomed with open arms! As both of them dislike me so intensely, I don't understand why they are making all this fuss, other than the fact that both have made it clear that what they really want is a fight. Pathetic! It would be much more to the point, if they were thinking of the good of this group, if they deplored the behaviour in this group which led to me having to do this. Common sense would dictate that I am not having in our home, people who have sworn at me, insulted me, virtually stalked me and in one case harassed me for years. It's perfectly understandable for you to want to exclude from your home people who, from the sound of it, you clearly detest. However, it does seem that there are more than two urglers who suspected you may have meant them. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1/3/07 17:36, in article ,
"Martin" wrote: snip I made my own list of who has been obnoxious to Sacha. You must be very forgiving if one isn't ITMA. ITMA. Aren't you a bit young for that? ;-) I wish you were right. Of course one of them is ITMA but as I've said before, naming names just asks for more squabbling. snip It's such a shame because that Plymouth-Roscoff crossing is wonderfully simple as it goes around midnight from Plymouth and you drive off early in the morning, straight into your holiday. Roscoff is a 15 hour drive from here. Hmm, bit much for a w/e in Devon, I do agree. To fly to Jersey from Schiphol one has to travel via Luton and it probably costs more than two weeks in Turkey. In the good old days there was a direct flight to Jersey, which took an odd route flying down the Belgian coast crossing the channel at Dover and then very low along the south coast before turning towards Jersey. I took it once to join a boat trip. Sounds an interesting flight! Rather strangely, there is now no longer a flight from Jersey to Paris, so one has to fly north to London to then fly south - and over Jersey - to Paris. Two of my children did that last year and I suggested that next time they fly to Dinan and see if they can get a train connection. Two years ago when we had to fly to Jersey rather suddenly for a funeral, it cost three of us just over £200 each to go in and out for the day - 2 flights of around 40 minutes each from Exeter. I'm sure the CI routes must be among the most expensive in the world. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1/3/07 17:20, in article , "BAC"
wrote: snip It's perfectly understandable for you to want to exclude from your home people who, from the sound of it, you clearly detest. However, it does seem that there are more than two urglers who suspected you may have meant them. I think the confusion arose when I spoke of the two women making all this fuss. Otherwise, everyone seemed perfectly clear as to whom I mean, as Sue said. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1/3/07 10:42, in article , "Charlie
Pridham" wrote: "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... snip Charlie, how long would it take to drive from our meet to your meet, do you think? I'm just thinking it would help people to plan their weekend as they could decide whether to drive down to your area on the Saturday night or the Sunday morning. I imagine being a Saturday meet here, it's going to be difficult for you and Liz to get away and come to lunch here? If you can make it, that would be lovely! -- Liz says its about a 2 hour drive via Plymouth and if no one wants to come down here (i.e. no takers!) then we may consider coming up on the Saturday in order to meet people although its our only free weekend until end of September so we may chicken out :~) I'm ashamed of you. ;-)) Imagine taking a whole week end to yourselves. ;-) So from Plymouth to you means about 2.5 hours from us altogether. It would probably be helpful to you both if people let you know very soon if they're going to come on down to you, no? -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Martin" wrote or even to exclude those that are at present included? Martin It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Jenny |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
In message , Sacha
writes On 1/3/07 17:20, in article , "BAC" wrote: snip It's perfectly understandable for you to want to exclude from your home people who, from the sound of it, you clearly detest. However, it does seem that there are more than two urglers who suspected you may have meant them. I think the confusion arose when I spoke of the two women making all this fuss. Otherwise, everyone seemed perfectly clear as to whom I mean, as Sue said. Well, I certainly didn't know and am still not 100% sure who they are. It makes me feel much better that I am not one of them. -- June Hughes |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
In message , Sacha
writes On 1/3/07 14:50, in article , "BAC" wrote: "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 1/3/07 10:28, in article , "charles" wrote: snip I have never met Sacha, but in her place I would do just the same. The thing that absolutely amazes me, is that two women who so often make crystal clear their thorough dislike of me would even consider wanting to come to our home and make this ridiculous foot-stamping fuss about doing something they don't want to do with someone they don't like! If that's the case, then what's the point in going public on their banned status? I'm surprised at this. June & Anne are not the people I will not have here, Thank you for telling us. I really believed I was one of those excluded after the things you have said to and about me in ukfd and here. I am pleased. though after this display both would need the hides of rhinos to imagine they would be actually welcomed with open arms! As both of them dislike me so intensely, I thought it was you who disliked me - after all, it was you who accused me when we had been having a friendly email correspondence (I had thought you liked me at last - silly me!) of weedling personal information out of you so that I could in some peculiar way use it against you. It was also you who accused me of 'cosying up' to Puce against Judith - wrong again, Sacha but you wouldn't take my word for it, would you? You called me hypocritical and when no-one listened to you, you stormed out of ukfd in a huff, insulting almost everyone as you went, only to re-appear a few days later as if nothing had happened. I don't understand why they are making all this fuss, other than the fact that both have made it clear that what they really want is a fight. Wrong again Sacha. Your original post about the meet has now proved to be misleading and confusing. Never mind. I hope you all enjoy it. Pathetic! It would be much more to the point, if they were thinking of the good of this group, if they deplored the behaviour in this group which led to me having to do this. Common sense would dictate that I am not having in our home, people who have sworn at me, insulted me, virtually stalked me and in one case harassed me for years. Well, AFAIK, I have not sworn at you, stalked you or harrassed you at all, although I do remember a few months ago in ukfd typing in a post that I couldn't give a flying f**k about what you were saying about me (when you were being at your most insulting) but that is all. -- June Hughes |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1 Mar, 18:17, "JennyC" wrote:
"Martin" wrote or even to exclude those that are at present included? It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ It's like a farce without the French bits slap slam door comes back in kiss slap kiss Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Sorry to disappoint you here but I've won a fiver it seems ;o) |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On Mar 1, 8:32 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from June Hughes contains these words: Anne Jackson writes June Hughes wrote: Sacha has insulted, verbally battered me and tried to get me thrown out of another ng. My crime was in answering her back. I still don't know whether or not I am one of the two omitted from the urg meet. I suspect the others are Mike from the Isle of Wight, Puce and possible Jenny C, who Sacha accused of condoning something Sacha had accused Puce of (Sacha announced this when I welcomed Jenny to ukfd a few months ago). If that is the case, then there are four, and not two. How come? Is this something else I'm to be left out of? I object, most strongly!! Still don't know whether or not she has excluded me. She won't say. Nice one Sacha. She got it very wrong when she accused me of 'cosying up' to Puce (her expression, not mine). Then on top of that, in ukfd, she accused me of getting all sorts of personal information out of her during an email exchange in order that I could 'use it' against her. What a lot of old rot! As for Judith, - it was she who insisted she was not reading the thread where Sacha was having a go at me about being two-faced because it upset her too much. I give up. They deserve each other. Bill has a somewhat coarse Army expression that covers the situation: 'They stick together, like shit to a blanket'! ;-) -- AnneJ - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You are such a lady Anne, as you say, coarse, not the sort of thing my hubsand would say, Officers know how to behave, he was brought up well and did not serve in the ranks. Kindest regards Judith |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On Mar 1, 8:50 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from "JennyC" contains these words: "Martin" wrote or even to exclude those that are at present included? Martin It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Jenny I'll have a fiver on me and June. -- AnneJ What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black? Judith |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1 Mar, 21:48, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from " contains these words: On Mar 1, 8:50 pm, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from "JennyC" contains these words: "Martin" wrote: or even to exclude those that are at present included? Martin It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Jenny I'll have a fiver on me and June. What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black? Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both of us. Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G -- AnneJ she only appreciates the genuine article so maybe you are right. Judith |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1 Mar, 21:46, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from " contains these words: You are such a lady Anne, as you say, coarse, not the sort of thing my hubsand would say, Officers know how to behave, he was brought up well and did not serve in the ranks. But it's a universally accepted truth that it's not the officers that run the Army, but the Sergeants... From the sergeants point of view you mean? ..for how long was your husband 'a Rodney' (as the sergeants refer to the officers), Judith? Bill served for 36 years... His name is Edward. Ranks always refer to Officers in that manner, something to do with green eyes I belive? ...and I have never had any desire to be mistaken for 'a lady', as anyone who knows me would tell you...I would, in fact, count that as an insult! g Insult? to be refrred to as well brought up and well mannered? g Judith |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
Anne Jackson wrote:
I'll have a fiver on me and June. What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black? Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both of us. Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G Please, give it a rest. Perhaps you amuse yourself by your rancid witterings, mabye you think you amuse others, in truth you are pathetic and VERY boring. pk |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On Mar 1, 10:34 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from "p.k." contains these words: Anne Jackson wrote: I'll have a fiver on me and June. What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black? Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both of us. Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G Please, give it a rest. Perhaps you amuse yourself by your rancid witterings, mabye you think you amuse others, in truth you are pathetic and VERY boring. Pogue mo chone! -- AnneJ That was crude,Anne, to all who don;t speak Gaelic, Anne said Kiss my A***l How can I translate that, because I am educated. g p.s. you got the spelling wrong. Judith |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Devon urg meet | United Kingdom | |||
misinformation about urg meet here | United Kingdom | |||
URG meet 2007? | United Kingdom | |||
Parallel lines in agriculture do meet? | sci.agriculture | |||
++ Meet More Women Easily With Pheromones ++ | Ponds |