Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
heap
Janet wrote:
Speaking of the Merkins, you're not allowed to call them lunatics any more. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17997413 (it's even more bizarre sounding on reading the article than it first appears, imho) Not so different from campaigns here to eliminate the use of misleading and/or stigmatising terms like mongol, spastic, split personality, manic depression. I was .. surprised to find it actually /ever/ had a mention in Federal law, let alone still did. I couldn't see the context, but I didn't study the article thoroughly, it may have had further references that I didn't see. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
heap
In article , wrote:
Janet wrote: Speaking of the Merkins, you're not allowed to call them lunatics any more. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17997413 (it's even more bizarre sounding on reading the article than it first appears, imho) Not so different from campaigns here to eliminate the use of misleading and/or stigmatising terms like mongol, spastic, split personality, manic depression. I was .. surprised to find it actually /ever/ had a mention in Federal law, let alone still did. I couldn't see the context, but I didn't study the article thoroughly, it may have had further references that I didn't see. I am not, and should be pretty flabberghasted if it were not used in some English statute law or binding precedent. It was the standard term for someone who was mentally incapable; if I recall, it was superseded by insane, which was itself superseded ages ago (possibly over a century ago). However, it is very different from the cases that Janet described, as the term has not been used in a medical sense in the lifetime of anyone living and, I believe that in the USA as here, hasn't even used as a widespread casual term for the mentally incapable in half a century and more. There are therefore good grounds for removing it from the law, but it is not offensive to people with specific medical conditions in the way that spastic is (when used as an insult). Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
heap
wrote in message ... In article , wrote: Janet wrote: Speaking of the Merkins, you're not allowed to call them lunatics any more. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17997413 (it's even more bizarre sounding on reading the article than it first appears, imho) Not so different from campaigns here to eliminate the use of misleading and/or stigmatising terms like mongol, spastic, split personality, manic depression. I was .. surprised to find it actually /ever/ had a mention in Federal law, let alone still did. I couldn't see the context, but I didn't study the article thoroughly, it may have had further references that I didn't see. I am not, and should be pretty flabberghasted if it were not used in some English statute law or binding precedent. It was the standard term for someone who was mentally incapable; if I recall, it was superseded by insane, which was itself superseded ages ago (possibly over a century ago). However, it is very different from the cases that Janet described, as the term has not been used in a medical sense in the lifetime of anyone living and, I believe that in the USA as here, hasn't even used as a widespread casual term for the mentally incapable in half a century and more. There are therefore good grounds for removing it from the law, but it is not offensive to people with specific medical conditions in the way that spastic is (when used as an insult). Regards, Nick Maclaren. Shanklin Theatre is used by a group for rehearsals and productions who have 'Leaning Difficulties' A lovely expression I feel :-) A word that I feel is a very very great loss is the word ... 'gay' :-( Mike -- .................................... I'm an Angel, honest ! The horns are there just to keep the halo straight. .................................... |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
heap
In article , says...
In article , wrote: Janet wrote: Speaking of the Merkins, you're not allowed to call them lunatics any more. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17997413 (it's even more bizarre sounding on reading the article than it first appears, imho) Not so different from campaigns here to eliminate the use of misleading and/or stigmatising terms like mongol, spastic, split personality, manic depression. I was .. surprised to find it actually /ever/ had a mention in Federal law, let alone still did. I couldn't see the context, but I didn't study the article thoroughly, it may have had further references that I didn't see.. I am not, and should be pretty flabberghasted if it were not used in some English statute law or binding precedent. Lots. right up until 1948. The General Board of Commissioners in Lunacy for Scotland continued to use that name until 1913. Westminster passed the Lunacy Act 1890, Lunacy Act 1911, and Mental Deficiency Act 1913 the 1913 Act defined "Institution for lunatics", as "the same meaning as in the Lunacy Acts". It also defined the classifications of "idiots: imbeciles: feeble-minded people: and moral defectives ". There was a Royal Commission on Lunacy and Mental Disorder, in 1924. The term Criminal Lunatic existed in law (referring to inmates of Broadmoor) until the Criminal Justice Act 1948, which declared "Discontinuance of terms "criminal lunatic" and "criminal lunatic asylum. Asylums and places appointed under section one of the Criminal Lunatic Asylums Act, i860, shall be called and are in this Act referred to as " Broadmoor institutions "; and accordingly for references to criminal lunatic asylums (by whatever name called) in any enactment there shall be substituted references to Broadmoor institutions. (2)The expression " criminal lunatic " shall cease to be used; and there shall be substituted for it wherever it occurs in any enactment the expression?Broadmoor patient.? Janet. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
heap
In article ,
Janet wrote: There was a Royal Commission on Lunacy and Mental Disorder, in 1924. The term Criminal Lunatic existed in law (referring to inmates of Broadmoor) until the Criminal Justice Act 1948, which declared Later than I thought, but bureaucrats are very like slugs in many respects :=( Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
heap
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
heap
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
heap
On Thu, 10 May 2012 22:18:36 +0100, "Christina Websell"
wrote: Well I had hoped that it would rot down, when the digger made a heap of it, but now it's just a huge amount of couch grass growing again in a 3 ft high heapsigh I guess growing courgettes in it are out of the plan now. Not necessarily. courgettes are very hard to kill, I wouldn't have thought the couch grass would do them much harm. They may even shade it over enough to kill it off a bit I'd sort of hoped it would turn into a gigantic compost heap but realistically, it's been too cold and wet. How long has it been there? My massive heap of couch grass and weeds is now lovely soil. The end I've started excavating is just about a year old. The other half has lots of things growing in it (jack by the hedge which smells lovely and garlicy) .. so I covered it in a pile of grass clippings I got. I have no experience with courgettes. I tried them once (not where I am planning to have them now) and the slugs got them. So, if I inserted a bit of chicken manure into the bottom of the hole that I plant them in (having started them at my house) do you think they would do OK? The main veggie beds show no sign of slugs or snails as there is a huge expanse of bare soil around them so nowhere to hide. It would be a brave slug or snail that attempted the journey to my lettuces (famous last words) -- http://www.voucherfreebies.co.uk |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
heap
mogga wrote:
I'd sort of hoped it would turn into a gigantic compost heap but realistically, it's been too cold and wet. How long has it been there? don't know abotu tina's, but /my/ weed compost heap is now growing buttercups out of it. :-( |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
heap
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
heap
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
heap
On 14/05/2012 13:26, Janet wrote:
In , says... wrote: Tina said I'd sort of hoped it would turn into a gigantic compost heap but realistically, it's been too cold and wet. mogg said How long has it been there? don't know abotu tina's, but /my/ weed compost heap is now growing buttercups out of it. :-( Isn't it contained/covered in any way? If I didn't contain and cover mine they would be so cool they'd take years to become usable compost. Rain and wind are both cooling. Light encourages weeds to grow. Tina's idea that a springtime naked heap of earth and newly dug couch grass would "become compost" was unrealistic; couch regenerates rapidly from its roots/stolons. If one wanted to farm couch grass on an industrial scale, piling it into an uncovered heap in spring, with loose soil and gentle rain, would work fine. I find overlooking a small piece to be an effective way of farming the stuff at this time of year. A hot heap will kill it but nothing less! -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
heap
In article ,
Martin Brown wrote: Tina's idea that a springtime naked heap of earth and newly dug couch grass would "become compost" was unrealistic; couch regenerates rapidly from its roots/stolons. If one wanted to farm couch grass on an industrial scale, piling it into an uncovered heap in spring, with loose soil and gentle rain, would work fine. I find overlooking a small piece to be an effective way of farming the stuff at this time of year. A hot heap will kill it but nothing less! My cold heap kills it. The key is that it ends up under a depth of actively rotting material, and its young leaves are as subject to bacterial attack as anything else. I occasionally have to remove couch that was in the top 6" when I stop building at about 4'. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
heap
Janet wrote:
don't know abotu tina's, but /my/ weed compost heap is now growing buttercups out of it. :-( Isn't it contained/covered in any way? If I didn't contain and cover mine they would be so cool they'd take years to become usable compost. Rain and wind are both cooling. Light encourages weeds to grow. Light, in general, encourages plants to grow. :-P The weed pile that I am talking about isn't covered, as the lid vanished one day during the strong winds, but it's in a green dalek. I didn't say I was surprised it was growing buttercups, just stating that it was. It'll probably be growing potatoes under the buttercups |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Something Nasty behind the compost heap... | United Kingdom | |||
Potatoes in compost heap | United Kingdom | |||
dog faeces can it be added to compost heap | United Kingdom | |||
aquarium water on compost heap?? | United Kingdom | |||
free to good home, muck heap | United Kingdom |