| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
23-12-2003, 10:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Data protection Act
In article ,
David Hill wrote: I wonder how many URGlers are aware that in re posting other peoples email addresses as part of a post/message like the following example is actually an offence under the data protection act. "...The message from In article , Jaques d'Alltrades writes: The message from "Arthur" contains these words:............" And before anyone says anything I have altered the addresses used in the example above. Actually, no, it isn't. You are not a data holder under either of the two Acts if you simply reply to a message. If you disagree, please post or Email a reference to the section of the Act that makes it illegal. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Re data protection act | United Kingdom | |||
| OT (just) Data protection Act | United Kingdom | |||
| OT (just) Data protection Act | United Kingdom | |||
| OT Data protection Act | United Kingdom | |||
| OT. Data protection Act | United Kingdom | |||
Threaded Mode
