WARNING WARNING
TROLL ALERT


On 4 May 2005 08:06:49 -0700, wrote:

so sad.. it seems that carol own people are kill filing her...

Gareee© wrote:
"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
...
I don't care to compromise my principals.... :-)

Oh please, as often as you've changed the header you have few
principals,
imho.

I'm not the one abusing this NG, he is. Perhaps
you can tell Jabbers

OMG, my bad, I have him killfilter, so of course HE'S not bothering
me. I
guess if I were to do same to you..... hmmmm, hate to do that,
but... it
is
tempting here lately.

Anyone ever tell you, that you're bull headed and apparently would
bloody
your head against a brick wall before using the door called reason?

So I guess it is now open season on rec.ponds, via this J person.
All
because of one hard headed person who has "principals". ~ jan

PS. If you reply you're playing into his hands Carol.

Sigh.. I finally filtered Carol as well.

Much as I hate to filter someone with similar interests and advise, I
also
have no tolerance for someone for whatEVER reason drags a squabble
into
another newsgroup.

I couldn't care any less about religious factions and their
practices, when
I'm here. And continuously crusading over in thier newsgroup, and
then
dragging the muck over here is just SO bad. And I've had to add
almost 70
names to my filter list because of this. I HATE having to add 10
people a
day, and I'm almost to the point of no longer remaining in the group
because
of this continuous garbage spewing in here.

I wouldn't start a street fight, an then drag it into a freind's
home, and I
can't respect someone who willingly would sacrifice our group, for
her
crusade.

IMHO, this makes Carol JUST as bad, if not worst then those she's
railing
against.

Only comment I'll make, and she's filtered now as well.
--
Gareee's Homepage:
http://www.fortunecity.com/tattooine.../mainframe.htm

Remove Delicious spam to reply

~ jan JJsPond.us wrote:
Carol wrote:


** Only because you're letting him win.


Whilst pointing that finger know that 3 are pointing back at the true
source.

No, Jan I don't think so. Now, I don't exonerate Carol -- allowing for
the fact that I can't even figure out who's who half the time under all
the nyms and stuff (partly because I don't care to spend the time it
would take), I don't think she's handled this mess very well. But I do
notice a pattern recently: a lot of Jabber threads contain only his
posts -- his respondent (Carol or otherwise) is editting out rec.ponds;
Jabs is adding it back in.

** Why don't you ask J why he dragged this NG into it?


Why should she or we? He's YOUR problem and yours alone. Don't like us
posting about him, don't reply. At least I remove his name.

Jan, *Jabbers* has made clear that *he* is dragging rec.ponds in because
of *his* feud with her. He wants *us* to take his side. I learned
long ago that there's no point in trying to adjudicate someone else's
net.feud, and I'm sure not changing that practice for this jerk.

**Because some of you can't IGNORE


"Follow you own advice"


Why blame anyone but the one who is doing all this
cross-posting/flooding?


There isn't any blame placement, except by she who claims there is, there
it must be? Personally, I saw a simple out, too bad you don't see it as
simply.

Carol may or may not have wronged Jabs (and I'm sure not taking his word
for it); if so she should do the right thing -- but not just to make him
go away. For one thing, that's just giving in to a spiteful little
net.terrorist.

**That's unfortunate but there ARE free news-servers out there.


And everyone one should do as Carol says?


All to spite me because I refuse to be intimidated


Oh please, you're cutting off your nose to spite your face. The feud came
here, for reasons I know not, but it has become very apparent that you,
Carol, have the power to remove it from rec.ponds.

Nope, only *Jabriol* has that power -- and I am not nearly as trustful
as you that he would keep his promise. To my personal knowledge, this
guy has a history of a being a spiteful lying sociopath going back to
~1998. I don't believe *anything* he says.

-- Kizhe

Recant, retract, recede, take back, withdraw. It's only printing on a
computer for gosh sakes, you're not real and neither is he or I. End it
and let's get back to ponding.

~ jan (Who has a right to her 2 cents just as much as Carol does)

~Power to the Porg, Flow On!~

"Lt. Kizhe Catson" wrote in message
...
~ jan JJsPond.us wrote:
Whilst pointing that finger know that 3 are pointing back at the true
source.

No, Jan I don't think so. Now, I don't exonerate Carol -- allowing for
the fact that I can't even figure out who's who half the time under all
the nyms and stuff (partly because I don't care to spend the time it
would take), I don't think she's handled this mess very well. But I do
notice a pattern recently: a lot of Jabber threads contain only his
posts -- his respondent (Carol or otherwise) is editting out rec.ponds;
Jabs is adding it back in.

## Thank you for taking the time to NOTICE that.

Why should she or we? He's YOUR problem and yours alone. Don't like us
posting about him, don't reply. At least I remove his name.

Jan, *Jabbers* has made clear that *he* is dragging rec.ponds in because
of *his* feud with her. He wants *us* to take his side. I learned
long ago that there's no point in trying to adjudicate someone else's
net.feud, and I'm sure not changing that practice for this jerk.

There isn't any blame placement, except by she who claims there is,
there
it must be? Personally, I saw a simple out, too bad you don't see it as
simply.

Carol may or may not have wronged Jabs (and I'm sure not taking his word
for it); if so she should do the right thing -- but not just to make him
go away. For one thing, that's just giving in to a spiteful little
net.terrorist.

## Which is something I will not do to please *anyone.* Besides, I cannot
recant what he himself wrote about years ago. It surprised me that someone
would even ask or expect me to do such a thing.

Oh please, you're cutting off your nose to spite your face. The feud
came
here, for reasons I know not, but it has become very apparent that you,
Carol, have the power to remove it from rec.ponds.

Nope, only *Jabriol* has that power -- and I am not nearly as trustful
as you that he would keep his promise.

## I assure you, he wouldn't. He's completely obsessed with me. I have no
power over Jabs, no more than I have the power over anyone else here, nor
should I have that power. Each of us are responsible for our own behavior.

To my personal knowledge, this
guy has a history of a being a spiteful lying sociopath going back to
~1998. I don't believe *anything* he says.

## He goes back quite aways before that even. He used several different
nyms in the past. I must add that I find it insulting that someone would
suggest I recant something Jabs himself posted about years ago. That makes
no sense. This rape/incest thing keeps cropping up over and over again.
The man is obsessed with the subject........ killfiles are probably the
only thing that will work.

Recant, retract, recede, take back, withdraw. It's only printing on a
computer for gosh sakes, you're not real and neither is he or I. End
it
and let's get back to ponding.

~ jan (Who has a right to her 2 cents just as much as Carol does)

~Power to the Porg, Flow On!~
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

I'm with Jan. You brought the trash in, and it is time for you to take it
out.

Anne

"Anne Lurie" wrote in message
m...
I'm with Jan. You brought the trash in, and it is time for you to take it
out.

Anne
=========================
I'm with Ronnie and several others. The *trash* followed me here, and I
shouldn't have to cave in to blackmail to get rid of it. I'm sorry that you
would if you were in my place.

But thanks for your opinion. :-)
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

Anne Lurie wrote:

I'm with Jan. You brought the trash in, and it is time for you to take it
out.

Carol's never done anything on this newsgroup to deserve this treatment.
One more for the killfile...
plonk
--
derek

On Fri, 06 May 2005 11:14:56 -0300, Derek Broughton
wrote:

Anne Lurie wrote:

I'm with Jan. You brought the trash in, and it is time for you to take it
out.

Carol's never done anything on this newsgroup to deserve this treatment.
One more for the killfile...
plonk

I think that is because your killfile is filtering her aliases and/or
crossposts. Of course now she'll come back and rebut that, saying it
happened very few times...... well, those few times (more than I could
count) have been enough.

Not to mention the easy out she could have taken for rec.ponds, but no, she
goes on about not being blackmailed into something. Totally silly to act
this way in cyberspace, imo, but I guess that is just me.

Anne & Elaine have been good rec.ponders, and not deserving of the
killfile, imho. ~ jan

~Power to the Porg, Flow On!~

"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
...

I think that is because your killfile is filtering her aliases and/or
crossposts.

* Which "aliases" and cross-posts are those? Do you expect me to use "Reel
McKoi" on all the NGs I frequent to make it easy for Jabriol to do the same
things on other groups? Or do you think you should dictate where other
rec.ponders post and what nyms they should use?

Of course now she'll come back and rebut that, saying it
happened very few times...... well, those few times (more than I could
count) have been enough.

* You can't could higher than THREE? Windsong, Cracklin' and Reel McKoi?
:-)))) I even use others on other NGs which isn't against anyone's TOS or
the law in the USA.

Not to mention the easy out she could have taken for rec.ponds, but no,
she
goes on about not being blackmailed into something.

* What easy way? Claim the freak didn't sexually abuse or abuse his
daughter in some way to please you and your friend? Why should I? All I
know is what he posted here himself. You want me to *LIE* so people like
you don't have to use a killfile? That takes some nerve.

Totally silly to act
this way in cyberspace, imo, but I guess that is just me.

* Just you and people like yourself. Giving in to such a nutcase like Jabs
solves nothing. And you sure don't seem to harass Jabriol to recant what he
said about me, my husband and my son. How odd..... How one sided, don't
you think?

Anne & Elaine have been good rec.ponders,

* So have I, and I've been here since 1996.

and not deserving of the
killfile, imho. ~ jan

* When people turn on someone and expect that person to *LIE* because "they
say so" for their own CONVENIENCE - yes, they deserve the killfile. And
with that I may killfile a few myself. If you can't handle the trolls and
nuts on Usenet perhaps you don't belong here. And I say that in all
sincerity......
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

The only nut I see on Usenet is Carol aka whoever she is
now......windsong, reelmckoi etc etc......
If anyone of the regular Rec.pond posters meant anything to her or
just the sanity of the group sahe would do what it takes and forget
it...its only a thing...........unless of course there is just
somethng much deeper between you and Jabriol..........and all these
other individuals that follow you around like a dog in heat for some
reason or other, and its not just to harrass you.......
My 2 cents worth.......




On Fri, 6 May 2005 17:24:09 -0500, "Reel McKoi"
wrote:

===
==="~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
===news:3spn71dns8i4lrhedejjvc3avfkb60hs0h@4ax. com...
===
=== I think that is because your killfile is filtering her aliases and/or
=== crossposts.
===
===* Which "aliases" and cross-posts are those? Do you expect me to use "Reel
===McKoi" on all the NGs I frequent to make it easy for Jabriol to do the same
===things on other groups? Or do you think you should dictate where other
===rec.ponders post and what nyms they should use?
===
===Of course now she'll come back and rebut that, saying it
=== happened very few times...... well, those few times (more than I could
=== count) have been enough.
===
===* You can't could higher than THREE? Windsong, Cracklin' and Reel McKoi?
===:-)))) I even use others on other NGs which isn't against anyone's TOS or
===the law in the USA.
===
=== Not to mention the easy out she could have taken for rec.ponds, but no,
===she
=== goes on about not being blackmailed into something.
===
===* What easy way? Claim the freak didn't sexually abuse or abuse his
===daughter in some way to please you and your friend? Why should I? All I
===know is what he posted here himself. You want me to *LIE* so people like
===you don't have to use a killfile? That takes some nerve.
===
=== Totally silly to act
=== this way in cyberspace, imo, but I guess that is just me.
===
===* Just you and people like yourself. Giving in to such a nutcase like Jabs
===solves nothing. And you sure don't seem to harass Jabriol to recant what he
===said about me, my husband and my son. How odd..... How one sided, don't
===you think?
===
=== Anne & Elaine have been good rec.ponders,
===
===* So have I, and I've been here since 1996.
===
===and not deserving of the
=== killfile, imho. ~ jan
===
===* When people turn on someone and expect that person to *LIE* because "they
===say so" for their own CONVENIENCE - yes, they deserve the killfile. And
===with that I may killfile a few myself. If you can't handle the trolls and
===nuts on Usenet perhaps you don't belong here. And I say that in all
===sincerity......


==============================================
Put some color in your cheeks...garden naked!

"~Roy~" wrote in message
...


The only nut I see on Usenet is Carol aka whoever she is
now......windsong, reelmckoi etc etc......

## And using different nyms to avoid trolls makes someone a nut? LOL!!!
:-D You must be new to Usenet. But that's ok. You'll learn there are
many, many people who do the same thing to avoid kooks and trolls from
invading all their NGs. :-)

If anyone of the regular Rec.pond posters meant anything to her or
just the sanity of the group sahe would do what it takes and forget
it...its only a thing

## Uh, what thing? It occurs to me if I meant anything to the people of
rec.ponds they would not expect me to *LIE* or recant about some sex abuse
case brought up in a *different* NG. They would do the right thing and
stop constantly referring to the known TROLL thereby encouraging him to keep
posting here. They would do the right thing and not expect me to bow to a
blackmailer, yet not expect the blackmailer to recant his slander and
lies.....

............unless of course there is just
somethng much deeper between you and Jabriol..........and all these
other individuals that follow you around like a dog in heat for some
reason or other, and its not just to harrass you.......

## Like you're harassing me now? :-) Is there a difference?
The anti-Jabriol entourage doesn't really surprise me as he's one of the
most despised men on Usenet. He drew many many people into this, his latest
flame-war, by cross-posting to probably 100 NGs, many where people despise
him and have for a long time. He eats up all this attention. The more
problems he causes HERE the longer he'll stay. The more I'm harassed here
to *LIE* the more it encourages him to stay. So keep it up if you want him
around forever.....

My 2 cents worth.......

## Thanks... maybe you can recant whatever it is Jabbers wants recanted....
and make him go away.
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
be silent, is the best answer to calumny."
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

Believe me, if I culd make the problem go away you would not be here
right now.....Maybe your not 100% of the problem but just like a
fungus on a fish, if the host is dead the fungas dies as well.....get
rid of the foodstuff the other source will go away as
well..........But you are part of the problem nonetheless, and a
pretty large part to say the least! Perhaps its just that you crave
all this attention, afterall we all know your track record for staying
contented......in more ways than one!

On Fri, 6 May 2005 18:47:46 -0500, "Reel McKoi"
wrote:

===
==="~Roy~" wrote in message
et...
===
===
=== The only nut I see on Usenet is Carol aka whoever she is
=== now......windsong, reelmckoi etc etc......
===
===## And using different nyms to avoid trolls makes someone a nut? LOL!!!
===:-D You must be new to Usenet. But that's ok. You'll learn there are
===many, many people who do the same thing to avoid kooks and trolls from
===invading all their NGs. :-)
===
=== If anyone of the regular Rec.pond posters meant anything to her or
=== just the sanity of the group sahe would do what it takes and forget
=== it...its only a thing
===
===## Uh, what thing? It occurs to me if I meant anything to the people of
===rec.ponds they would not expect me to *LIE* or recant about some sex abuse
===case brought up in a *different* NG. They would do the right thing and
===stop constantly referring to the known TROLL thereby encouraging him to keep
===posting here. They would do the right thing and not expect me to bow to a
===blackmailer, yet not expect the blackmailer to recant his slander and
===lies.....
===
===...........unless of course there is just
=== somethng much deeper between you and Jabriol..........and all these
=== other individuals that follow you around like a dog in heat for some
=== reason or other, and its not just to harrass you.......
===
===## Like you're harassing me now? :-) Is there a difference?
===The anti-Jabriol entourage doesn't really surprise me as he's one of the
===most despised men on Usenet. He drew many many people into this, his latest
===flame-war, by cross-posting to probably 100 NGs, many where people despise
===him and have for a long time. He eats up all this attention. The more
===problems he causes HERE the longer he'll stay. The more I'm harassed here
===to *LIE* the more it encourages him to stay. So keep it up if you want him
===around forever.....
===
=== My 2 cents worth.......
===
===## Thanks... maybe you can recant whatever it is Jabbers wants recanted....
===and make him go away.


==============================================
Put some color in your cheeks...garden naked!
--/---\--@ ---/--\--@

~~~~ }((((o ~~~~~~ }{{{{o ~~~~~~~ }(((((o

"~Roy~" wrote in message
...
Believe me, if I culd make the problem go away you would not be here
right now.....Maybe your not 100% of the problem but just like a
fungus on a fish, if the host is dead the fungas dies as well.....get
rid of the foodstuff the other source will go away as
well..........

** Which also applies to YOU of course. No YOU, no threads like this one
that encourage him to stay. Why should I pay for his bad behavior?

But you are part of the problem nonetheless, and a
pretty large part to say the least!

** Because I refuse to lie and recant whatever he posted happened with his
daughter 10 years ago?

Perhaps its just that you crave
all this attention,

** It appears YOU crave the attention since you people keep this going - not
me! I repeat, you're doing this to keep him here for some reason.

afterall we all know your track record for staying
contented......in more ways than one!

** Afterall, we also all know *your* track record for staying
contented......in more ways than one! LOL!!! :-D

Have a nice evening.....
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

"Reel McKoi" wrote in message
...

"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
...

I think that is because your killfile is filtering her aliases and/or
crossposts.

* Which "aliases" and cross-posts are those? Do you expect me to use
"Reel
McKoi" on all the NGs I frequent to make it easy for Jabriol to do the
same
things on other groups? Or do you think you should dictate where other
rec.ponders post and what nyms they should use?

If you weren't such a shithead, you wouldn't need all your aliases and
nyms and remailers. You alone, by your obnoxious behaviour elsewhere,
brought this mess here. You should be ashamed of what you caused, as any
reasonable person would, rather than lashing out at people here who have
given you way more than the benefit of a doubt.

Of course now she'll come back and rebut that, saying it
happened very few times...... well, those few times (more than I could
count) have been enough.

* You can't could higher than THREE? Windsong, Cracklin' and Reel McKoi?
:-)))) I even use others on other NGs which isn't against anyone's TOS or
the law in the USA.

Not to mention the easy out she could have taken for rec.ponds, but no,
she
goes on about not being blackmailed into something.

* What easy way? Claim the freak didn't sexually abuse or abuse his
daughter in some way to please you and your friend? Why should I? All I
know is what he posted here himself. You want me to *LIE* so people like
you don't have to use a killfile? That takes some nerve.

Totally silly to act
this way in cyberspace, imo, but I guess that is just me.

* Just you and people like yourself. Giving in to such a nutcase like
Jabs
solves nothing. And you sure don't seem to harass Jabriol to recant what
he
said about me, my husband and my son. How odd..... How one sided, don't
you think?

Anne & Elaine have been good rec.ponders,

* So have I, and I've been here since 1996.

and not deserving of the
killfile, imho. ~ jan

* When people turn on someone and expect that person to *LIE* because
"they
say so" for their own CONVENIENCE - yes, they deserve the killfile. And
with that I may killfile a few myself. If you can't handle the trolls and
nuts on Usenet perhaps you don't belong here. And I say that in all
sincerity......
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

FLUSH


"cat daddy" wrote in message
...

"Reel McKoi" wrote in message
...

"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
...

I think that is because your killfile is filtering her aliases and/or
crossposts.

* Which "aliases" and cross-posts are those? Do you expect me to use
"Reel
McKoi" on all the NGs I frequent to make it easy for Jabriol to do the
same
things on other groups? Or do you think you should dictate where other
rec.ponders post and what nyms they should use?

If you weren't such a shithead, you wouldn't need all your aliases and
nyms and remailers. You alone, by your obnoxious behaviour elsewhere,
brought this mess here. You should be ashamed of what you caused, as any
reasonable person would, rather than lashing out at people here who have
given you way more than the benefit of a doubt.

Of course now she'll come back and rebut that, saying it
happened very few times...... well, those few times (more than I could
count) have been enough.

* You can't could higher than THREE? Windsong, Cracklin' and Reel
McKoi?
:-)))) I even use others on other NGs which isn't against anyone's TOS
or
the law in the USA.

Not to mention the easy out she could have taken for rec.ponds, but
no,
she
goes on about not being blackmailed into something.

* What easy way? Claim the freak didn't sexually abuse or abuse his
daughter in some way to please you and your friend? Why should I? All
I
know is what he posted here himself. You want me to *LIE* so people
like
you don't have to use a killfile? That takes some nerve.

Totally silly to act
this way in cyberspace, imo, but I guess that is just me.

* Just you and people like yourself. Giving in to such a nutcase like
Jabs
solves nothing. And you sure don't seem to harass Jabriol to recant
what
he
said about me, my husband and my son. How odd..... How one sided,
don't
you think?

Anne & Elaine have been good rec.ponders,

* So have I, and I've been here since 1996.

and not deserving of the
killfile, imho. ~ jan

* When people turn on someone and expect that person to *LIE* because
"they
say so" for their own CONVENIENCE - yes, they deserve the killfile.
And
with that I may killfile a few myself. If you can't handle the trolls
and
nuts on Usenet perhaps you don't belong here. And I say that in all
sincerity......
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

I could not have said that better myself. Even though I cond=sidered
myself right at the time and jumped down some of the forums members
throats over posts, I even antied up and made things right.......at
least to those I may have offended and to those I did not, I
appolgize........see, I am still here, I did not blow up or melt, it
was easy, it saves a lot of hassleing and griping.........I would not
know any posters here if they bit me in the butt and odds are none
would know me if I bit them in the butt, its a cyber thing.........For
all anyone knows I could be a major drug dealer, and they could be
Osama Bin Laden..........who really cares........but to drag ones
dirty laundry around with them is total stupidity, and its only bound
to cause such problems........So all she has to do is set there type
up an appology to jabriol, and she cxan croiss her fingers and legs
and eyes for that matter, and hit enter................its over with
finished........things will get back to normal..........NO WAY!... she
says she has morales.........yea right, had maybe more like HAD
morales and where she left them is anyones guess!

Just Roy

On Fri, 6 May 2005 19:32:36 -0500, "cat daddy"
wrote:

===
==="Reel McKoi" wrote in message
...
===
=== "~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
=== ...
===
=== I think that is because your killfile is filtering her aliases and/or
=== crossposts.
===
=== * Which "aliases" and cross-posts are those? Do you expect me to use
==="Reel
=== McKoi" on all the NGs I frequent to make it easy for Jabriol to do the
===same
=== things on other groups? Or do you think you should dictate where other
=== rec.ponders post and what nyms they should use?
===
=== If you weren't such a shithead, you wouldn't need all your aliases and
===nyms and remailers. You alone, by your obnoxious behaviour elsewhere,
===brought this mess here. You should be ashamed of what you caused, as any
===reasonable person would, rather than lashing out at people here who have
===given you way more than the benefit of a doubt.
===
=== Of course now she'll come back and rebut that, saying it
=== happened very few times...... well, those few times (more than I could
=== count) have been enough.
===
=== * You can't could higher than THREE? Windsong, Cracklin' and Reel McKoi?
=== :-)))) I even use others on other NGs which isn't against anyone's TOS or
=== the law in the USA.
===
=== Not to mention the easy out she could have taken for rec.ponds, but no,
=== she
=== goes on about not being blackmailed into something.
===
=== * What easy way? Claim the freak didn't sexually abuse or abuse his
=== daughter in some way to please you and your friend? Why should I? All I
=== know is what he posted here himself. You want me to *LIE* so people like
=== you don't have to use a killfile? That takes some nerve.
===
=== Totally silly to act
=== this way in cyberspace, imo, but I guess that is just me.
===
=== * Just you and people like yourself. Giving in to such a nutcase like
===Jabs
=== solves nothing. And you sure don't seem to harass Jabriol to recant what
===he
=== said about me, my husband and my son. How odd..... How one sided, don't
=== you think?
===
=== Anne & Elaine have been good rec.ponders,
===
=== * So have I, and I've been here since 1996.
===
=== and not deserving of the
=== killfile, imho. ~ jan
===
=== * When people turn on someone and expect that person to *LIE* because
==="they
=== say so" for their own CONVENIENCE - yes, they deserve the killfile. And
=== with that I may killfile a few myself. If you can't handle the trolls and
=== nuts on Usenet perhaps you don't belong here. And I say that in all
=== sincerity......
=== --
=== McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
=== ~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o
===
===


==============================================
Put some color in your cheeks...garden naked!
--/---\--@ ---/--\--@

~~~~ }((((o ~~~~~~ }{{{{o ~~~~~~~ }(((((o