Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #46   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 04:32 AM
Janet
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

I was just reading an article that was stating all the loopholes the animal
protein ban in feed. Calves are routinely fed milk replacer that is made
from cattle blood here
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...industryatrisk
I didn't even know that was available! We only ever fed out one calf and it
was with a soy based milk replacer. \ Ingrid you are full of all kind of
interesting tidbits aren't you! D
Janet

wrote in message
...
blood can transmit prions, so during birth there is that possibility as

the placenta
separates. however, calves dont nurse long on dairy cows, and they are

saying this
cow was born before the ban. still no evidence it is transmitted in milk.

Ingrid

~ jan JJsPond.us wrote:
So you're saying you got the impression from the articles it was the

fetus
that picked up BSE from the mother eating infected feed? The fetus and
eventually calf/cow was the one they found infected? I must be
misunderstanding, because Canada only found 1 BSE cow, if the calf had

it,
so would have the mother. Unless the calf was fed contaminated feed,

which
it would have gotten in Canada if born there from the PG US cow. ???



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.



  #47   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 06:04 AM
Tom La Bron
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

Jan,

It is so interesting that you said what Ingrid said is good enough for you.
If you would have read the article at the URL you would have seen that there
is no indication that it is transferable to offspring. The whole article
was filled with maybes and possibilities and supposition and very little
fact, except, of course, the part where hamsters that had MCD injected in
their brains had it showed up in their tongues.

What was it that P.T Barnum said, "....!?" ;-)

Tom L.L.




"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
...
Well Janet, you aren't gonna appreciate the latest news. They're
(newspaper) saying since they've (USDA, I assume) figured out this
"Holstein" cow came out of Canada that we can still consider the US

disease
free. That importing nations should (trust in us) open their borders to

our
beef. IMO, if I was an import nation I'd be saying, "I don't think so,
bub!" I want to know where those 73 other cows are (that came in with
Daisy) that they've yet to track down! I'm not eating any beef till I

know,
and I want them all tested to see if Daisy was (most likely) a singular
incident (as they are also claiming).

As far as head in the manure, I sure hope they're paying attention to the
rancher who may have to kill all 400 calves because he didn't tag them.
Seems one of Daisy's offspring is among them, but they don't know which
one. I can't imagine running a business like that, not knowing where your
critters come from. Thank goodness our government will compensate these
people, since it is they who make and decide on the rules. Time to kick

the
Cattlemen's ASSociation in the rump roast if you ask me. ~ jan
Zone 7a

This is exactly our point up here in Canada Jan.... WHen it happened to

us
the US AG dept was all over it spouting the "risks". Now that it's on US
soil its nothing to worry about. As for your microchip comment you don't
know how true that is!!! Here in Canada a cattle health registry was

formed
in response to 2 things.The BSE and H&M outbreak in Britain and the EU
demanded that any country that wanted to export to the EU must have one

in
place. What this means that in our case here in Canada when an animal

leaves
its farm of origin it must be tagged with a registry tag. The tags can

only
be bought from authorized dealers and they contain a barcode. When the

tag
is put on an animal a stack of paperwork must be filled out with a

history
on the animal. That tag stays with the animal right to the packer. If

there
is a problem it can quickly and accurately be traced through the system.

No
animal can move through an auction or sale without a tag.
Now the US does not have any such program in place. This is due to the
lobbying of the US Cattlemens Assoc. They have been stalling this for at
least 5 years, if not longer. The EU keeps giving the US an extension

based
on the bogus word of the Cattlemens Assoc saying that they are "working"

on
it. The Canadian program has offered to go down to the US, offered it's
research into tag life, offered it's tracking software... Even gone so

far
as to offer to set the damn program up from start to finish and the US
Cattlemen have refused! Why?? Stubborness (sp?) is my best bet. They are
holding on to a century old way of thinking that they know what's best

for
the industry, all the while burying their collective heads in the manure
pile...
Janet




  #48   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 06:04 AM
Tom La Bron
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

There is something else that needs to be considered in this entire scenario.
This disease, unless you are injecting infected prions in to the animal's
brain, takes a long time to manifest itself and have any outward signs that
anything is going wrong inside the animal. It can be years before you can
even suspect that the animal is sick with this problem.

Tom L.L.
"T" wrote in message
ink.net...
Good point, which is why I mainly consume poultry, as I find red meat to

be
very hard on my digestive system IE my case of diverticulitus may have

been
caused by a staple high in red meats, but also from not eating enough

fibers
as well.

Tim...
"john rutz" wrote in message
...


Ka30P wrote:
Clyde asked

The Question I have is why only one cow in the Middle of
Washington State?


Latest word is the cow came from Canada and there will be more. (NOT
to get in the middle of the strains of "Blame Canada" being of
Canadian birth mineself, but that is what we are hearing now)


ka30p http://www.geocities.com/watergarden...dors/home.html

an my question is how long have we been eating cows like this without
indident till some test tube type named it?

John Rutz
( who wont eat anything that doesnt have four legs and horns)





  #49   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 06:42 AM
T
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

I now stand corrected, my apologies..

Tim


"Janet" wrote in message
...
Jan I've pulled up a couple os stories that ran but the news service

stories
don't seem to be archived. Here's the links..

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...oww0703/BNStor
y/National/
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/07/03/madcow_us030703

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../20030704/UCOW
WN/TPNational/TopStories
The last article that I read on this after some snooping around the net
reports that the Canadian AG dept at the end of their extensive
investigation could only say with 95% certainty that the cow that tested
positive was Canadian born. They felt it was highly likely that the cow in
question came into Canada ( most likely as a fetus)during the mass
importation of the 25,000 head of pregnant females. It is now known that
those females were fed feed in the US that contained animal proteins...
Janet


"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
...
Tim Wrote:
far as the US being BSE free, people must remeber the one that was

found
in
Canada originated from the US which was proven beyond a shadow of

doubt...
But then again, it doesn't happen here in the US of A does it??

Truth be told, I can't remember that, probably because it never got to

our
newspapers, ya think? Wonder who held that news up? If it did, it

probably
said, the cow got it (BSE) after it entered Canada. There isn't a story
on-line regarding that somewhere is there? I'd like to send it to my

local
paper. ~ jan


On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:47:46 GMT, "T" wrote:


Common sense does not seem to be to common.. You would think to insure

the
integrity of the heard they would leave the tags alone and use another

tag
along side of it... The problem with not knowing where Daisy came from

is
going to be an intresting case ( like I mentioned at the bottom of the
thread ). Not trying to point fingers, but when there is a removal of

the
takes it defianatly upsets the apple cart, making things a lot harder

to
prove and yes, much more expensive to the tax payer in eithier

country..
As
far as the US being BSE free, people must remeber the one that was

found
in
Canada originated from the US which was proven beyond a shadow of

doubt...
But then again, it doesn't happen here in the US of A does it??

Tim..
-
"Janet" wrote in message
.. .
I was just reading that Jan... Up here we are getting that our

Canadian
AG Dept. is not sure that the tag in question belonged to "Daisy".

The
information doesn't match. According to the tag she was supposed to

be
6
but
the US AG dept is saying that she was only 4 or 4 /12 (and standing

by
that
"fact"). DNA testing is now being done to try to verify "Daisy's"
identity.
Now that leaves a real dilemma doesn't it !?! That would mean at

least
2
more of her calves are out there somewhere if she does prove to be 6!
Apparently our media is reporting that it's common practice for tags

to
be
removed (contrary to our law) when cattle cross the border from

Canada
into
the US. This is why the tag is in question. American ranchers and

dairies
remove them to insert their own herd id. Apparently from what our

media
is
reporting that the dairy kept the tags of the imported cattle but

took
them
out and put them back in when either shipping them back to Canada or
sending
to slaughter! O It's looking like he didn't get the right tag back

in
possibly... The problem arises in a case like this and when millions

of
animals a year are moving across the border and back again....

I am of the opinion that the US Cattlemens Assoc doesn't give a

rat's
ass
for the little guy with a herd of a couple dozen grazing his back 20.

They
have planted themselves firmly in the pockets of the big 3 packers

that
control everything.... You'd be surprised Jan and how most ranchers
operate.
Many seem to be firmly planted in running the ranch like

great-grandpappy
did. O They feel if it was good enough for him it's good enough for

YOU
to
eat! Needless to say when one mentions the way beef cattle are moved

to
several farms often in 2 seperate countries over their short lives

(less
than 2 years in most cases) and what that can mean if there is a

disease
outbreak they laugh and say "It ain't gonna happen here"..... I guess

it
did
huh?
Janet


"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
...
Well Janet, you aren't gonna appreciate the latest news. They're
(newspaper) saying since they've (USDA, I assume) figured out this
"Holstein" cow came out of Canada that we can still consider the US
disease
free. That importing nations should (trust in us) open their

borders
to
our
beef. IMO, if I was an import nation I'd be saying, "I don't think

so,
bub!" I want to know where those 73 other cows are (that came in

with
Daisy) that they've yet to track down! I'm not eating any beef till

I
know,
and I want them all tested to see if Daisy was (most likely) a

singular
incident (as they are also claiming).

As far as head in the manure, I sure hope they're paying attention

to
the
rancher who may have to kill all 400 calves because he didn't tag

them.
Seems one of Daisy's offspring is among them, but they don't know

which
one. I can't imagine running a business like that, not knowing

where
your
critters come from. Thank goodness our government will compensate

these
people, since it is they who make and decide on the rules. Time to

kick
the
Cattlemen's ASSociation in the rump roast if you ask me. ~ jan
Zone 7a

This is exactly our point up here in Canada Jan.... WHen it

happened
to
us
the US AG dept was all over it spouting the "risks". Now that it's

on
US
soil its nothing to worry about. As for your microchip comment

you
don't
know how true that is!!! Here in Canada a cattle health registry

was
formed
in response to 2 things.The BSE and H&M outbreak in Britain and

the
EU
demanded that any country that wanted to export to the EU must

have
one
in
place. What this means that in our case here in Canada when an

animal
leaves
its farm of origin it must be tagged with a registry tag. The tags

can
only
be bought from authorized dealers and they contain a barcode. When

the
tag
is put on an animal a stack of paperwork must be filled out with a
history
on the animal. That tag stays with the animal right to the packer.

If
there
is a problem it can quickly and accurately be traced through the
system.
No
animal can move through an auction or sale without a tag.
Now the US does not have any such program in place. This is due

to
the
lobbying of the US Cattlemens Assoc. They have been stalling this

for
at
least 5 years, if not longer. The EU keeps giving the US an

extension
based
on the bogus word of the Cattlemens Assoc saying that they are
"working"
on
it. The Canadian program has offered to go down to the US, offered

it's
research into tag life, offered it's tracking software... Even

gone
so
far
as to offer to set the damn program up from start to finish and

the
US
Cattlemen have refused! Why?? Stubborness (sp?) is my best bet.

They
are
holding on to a century old way of thinking that they know what's

best
for
the industry, all the while burying their collective heads in the
manure
pile...
Janet










  #50   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 07:02 AM
T
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

This is part of the case Tom.. Also part of the case is leaving the tags
alone instead of the ranchers removing them from the animal.. I don't think
the cows mind having an extra hole pierced in there ears, heck it can't be
no worse than what I see the kids do them selves today... esshh..

Tim


"Tom La Bron" wrote in message
...
There is something else that needs to be considered in this entire

scenario.
This disease, unless you are injecting infected prions in to the animal's
brain, takes a long time to manifest itself and have any outward signs

that
anything is going wrong inside the animal. It can be years before you can
even suspect that the animal is sick with this problem.

Tom L.L.
"T" wrote in message
ink.net...
Good point, which is why I mainly consume poultry, as I find red meat to

be
very hard on my digestive system IE my case of diverticulitus may have

been
caused by a staple high in red meats, but also from not eating enough

fibers
as well.

Tim...
"john rutz" wrote in message
...


Ka30P wrote:
Clyde asked

The Question I have is why only one cow in the Middle of
Washington State?


Latest word is the cow came from Canada and there will be more.

(NOT
to get in the middle of the strains of "Blame Canada" being of
Canadian birth mineself, but that is what we are hearing now)


ka30p http://www.geocities.com/watergarden...dors/home.html
an my question is how long have we been eating cows like this without
indident till some test tube type named it?

John Rutz
( who wont eat anything that doesnt have four legs and horns)









  #51   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 07:42 AM
~ jan JJsPond.us
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

I'm gonna ignore the dig regarding P.T.B. & Suckers. Honestly Tom, you just
can't help yourself from saying something inflamatory, can you? S

Regarding what John said though: "
an my question is how long have we been eating cows like this without
indident till some test tube type named it?
John Rutz


I have to agree with Tom, it isn't the test tube types that created the
problem, the incidents were always there, we just didn't know the cause
and/or how to prevent them. Life was better when we were ignorant? Sorry, I
don't think so John.

One does wonder with the short life span of an Angus, just how safe are we?
~ jan

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:02:49 -0600, "Tom La Bron" wrote:


There is something else that needs to be considered in this entire scenario.
This disease, unless you are injecting infected prions in to the animal's
brain, takes a long time to manifest itself and have any outward signs that
anything is going wrong inside the animal. It can be years before you can
even suspect that the animal is sick with this problem.

Tom L.L.
ka30p http://www.geocities.com/watergarden...dors/home.html
( who wont eat anything that doesnt have four legs and horns)





  #52   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 04:02 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

well shit... I didnt know they used blood in milk replacer. My farm experience is
summers on my grandparents farm. but I am sure IF they used it they didnt know what
was in it. Kosher laws are looking better and better. Ingrid

"Janet" wrote:
I was just reading an article that was stating all the loopholes the animal
protein ban in feed. Calves are routinely fed milk replacer that is made
from cattle blood here
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...industryatrisk
I didn't even know that was available! We only ever fed out one calf and it
was with a soy based milk replacer. \ Ingrid you are full of all kind of
interesting tidbits aren't you! D
Janet

wrote in message
...
blood can transmit prions, so during birth there is that possibility as

the placenta
separates. however, calves dont nurse long on dairy cows, and they are

saying this
cow was born before the ban. still no evidence it is transmitted in milk.

Ingrid



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.
  #53   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 04:12 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

they dont have too... but IIRC if they do send it in and it is positive, then they
get something like $200. one reason is so many hunters dropped out of hunting last
year. big economic loss for northern Wisconsin. they interview these hunters on TV
and most of em were saying they werent worried about it. so far I DONT think they
have proved (or announced) that CWD is ACTUALLY transmissible to humans. Ingrid

John Hines wrote:

wrote:

I dont know .... the deer hunters in Wisconsin know about the "mad deer" disease in
the deer they are shooting and eating.. doesnt stop em at all. Ingrid


Yeah, but don't they have to send the heads in for analysis?




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.
  #54   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 04:13 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

if they were born, raised and turned into steaks since 1997 (?-since the ban in the
US) very safe from BSE. Ingrid

~ jan JJsPond.us wrote:
One does wonder with the short life span of an Angus, just how safe are we?
~ jan



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.
  #55   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 06:03 PM
Janet
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

Well Ingrid after doing some more digging and talking to my former feed
rep., yes it's widely available both here in Canada and in the US. It's
about $15 a bag cheaper than the soy based milk replacer ($40 a bag). It's
widely used for economic reasons... Damn, this is getting scarier almost by
the minute.... I always knew there was another reason why I refuse to eat
veal!
Janet

wrote in message
...
well shit... I didnt know they used blood in milk replacer. My farm

experience is
summers on my grandparents farm. but I am sure IF they used it they didnt

know what
was in it. Kosher laws are looking better and better. Ingrid

"Janet" wrote:
I was just reading an article that was stating all the loopholes the

animal
protein ban in feed. Calves are routinely fed milk replacer that is made
from cattle blood here


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...e=1&u=/usatoda

y/20031229/cm_usatoday/laxrulesandtestingputpubliccattleindustryatrisk
I didn't even know that was available! We only ever fed out one calf and

it
was with a soy based milk replacer. \ Ingrid you are full of all kind

of
interesting tidbits aren't you! D
Janet

wrote in message
...
blood can transmit prions, so during birth there is that possibility as

the placenta
separates. however, calves dont nurse long on dairy cows, and they are

saying this
cow was born before the ban. still no evidence it is transmitted in

milk.
Ingrid



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.





  #56   Report Post  
Old 30-12-2003, 06:13 PM
~ jan JJsPond.us
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

Your right, assuming no cross-contamination of cow-part-infected chicken
feed with beef calf feed. We're down to that very low minimal risk, but why
take any at all when it can so easily be eliminated by not using those
parts? Granted a probably more expensive protein material would have to be
used, but I doubt it would add that much per pound of poultry, etc. ~ jan

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:02:39 GMT, wrote:


if they were born, raised and turned into steaks since 1997 (?-since the ban in the
US) very safe from BSE. Ingrid

~ jan JJsPond.us wrote:
One does wonder with the short life span of an Angus, just how safe are we?
~ jan



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.


~ jan
  #57   Report Post  
Old 31-12-2003, 12:06 AM
Anne Lurie
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

Has it occurred to anyone else here in the US that *lumber* is apparently
tracked more accurately than food is????

If I buy a 2x4 at Home Depot, it can apparently be tracked throughout its
whole life -- which seems to be quite simple compared to figuring out this
whole mad cow mess.

Anne Lurie
(in the heart of pig country)
Raleigh, NC


  #58   Report Post  
Old 31-12-2003, 03:35 AM
Ka30P
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA


More Mad Moo News ~~
USDA Bans Risky Cow Parts from Hamburger Production
Reuters*- 1*hour*ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - US hamburger derived from special meat trimming
equipment cannot contain any central nervous system material that could spread
mad cow disease, the US Agriculture Department said on Tuesday.


ka30p
http://www.geocities.com/watergarden...dors/home.html
  #59   Report Post  
Old 31-12-2003, 03:42 AM
Janet
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

Here are a couple of interesting links with some of todays events and
issues...
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/ramasastry/20031230.html and
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._re_us/mad_cow .
The interesting part (for me anyway) in the new "rules" announced today is
they dind't announce any timelines for implementation.
Janet

"Ka30P" wrote in message
...

More Mad Moo News ~~
USDA Bans Risky Cow Parts from Hamburger Production
Reuters - 1 hour ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - US hamburger derived from special meat trimming
equipment cannot contain any central nervous system material that could

spread
mad cow disease, the US Agriculture Department said on Tuesday.


ka30p
http://www.geocities.com/watergarden...dors/home.html



  #60   Report Post  
Old 31-12-2003, 01:42 PM
Offbreed
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT ~ Mad Moo Cow in SE WA

wrote:

There is a specific warning about "offal" which includes intestines. intestines also
includes lymphatic tissues sites of immune system cells called Peyers patches.
lymphatic tissue is suspect including the spleen, another large site of immune cells.

every time animals take a dump cells of the intestines are scraped off with the crap.


Oh. I'd never heard of the lymph tissue link. Nor that it was also
found in the intestines.

(Now if it was certain people in another news group, I'd not have
the least doubt how they ended up with something that was supposed to
be inside everyone *elses* skull ended up mixed with their dung.)

(Not to mention any names.)

rabbits are rather inefficient and even my dogs would go for rabbit poop in a big
way.


Dogs, pigs, bear, lots of animals, any type of dung not from their own
species. I guess deer could lip some up easily, without most people
being in a position to see what they were doing.


I would be very interested in what the other group has to say about CWD
transmission in deer.


Jan has not gotten back with any info that I've seen. She is good
people and usually pretty level headed, even if she pays too much
attention to PBS G.

I know the game farms have admitted feeding meat/bone meal to
game animals and losing them over fences.


Thought they did that. There is also a bit of freelance
feeding of wildlife (there is a big industry based on that),
and some of the augmentation feed intended to grow bigger antlers
might have started some of the infections.

Here in Wisconsin there was a guy up north that was a big hunter, had these huge
dinner parties with lots of wild game of all kinds. He has died of CJD and I have
heard so have some of his guests. So eating a lot of wild game it is more likely to
get an infected animal AND get a big enough dose to cause disease.


Wellll, hampsters are kind of short lived. If I understand how prions
"multiply", one prion surviving to reach a safe area in a human could
eventually corrupt enough other proteins to become a problem. Kuru
had maybe a 40yr incubation?

Yes, there sure are all kinds of prion diseases. Ingrid


(shudder) As I understand, not all of them are a problem, though?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bone/ Blood Meal and Mad Cow Disease George Orwell Gardening 72 18-09-2017 09:40 PM
gastroenteritis [and mushrooms] (was How mad cow disease may have gotten into your hamburger Phred Plant Science 3 13-01-2004 01:42 PM
Blood Meal and Mad Cow question for the group. Burger King Edible Gardening 6 03-01-2004 05:32 AM
Mad Cow Disease / Mad Deer Disease Jim Webster sci.agriculture 370 01-05-2003 10:44 AM
New thread. Mad Cow Disease / Mad Deer Disease Lotus sci.agriculture 1 31-12-2002 03:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017